Skip to main content Accessibility help

Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics

  • Eric Lawrence (a1), John Sides (a2) and Henry Farrell (a3)


Political scientists and political theorists debate the relationship between participation and deliberation among citizens with different political viewpoints. Blogs provide an important testing ground for their claims. We examine deliberation, polarization, and political participation among blog readers. We find that blog readers gravitate toward blogs that accord with their political beliefs. Few read blogs on both the left and right of the ideological spectrum. Furthermore, those who read left-wing blogs and those who read right-wing blogs are ideologically far apart. Blog readers are more polarized than either non-blog-readers or consumers of various television news programs, and roughly as polarized as US senators. Blog readers also participate more in politics than non-blog readers. Readers of blogs of different ideological dispositions do not participate less than those who read only blogs of one ideological disposition. Instead, readers of both left- and right-wing blogs and readers of exclusively leftwing blogs participate at similar levels, and both participate more than readers of exclusively right-wing blogs. This may reflect social movement-building efforts by left-wing bloggers.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics
      Available formats



Hide All
Ackerman, Bruce A., and Fishkin, James A.. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Adamic, Lada A., and Glance, Natalie. 2005. “The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 US Election: Divided They Blog.” Working paper.
Agre, Philip E. 2004. The Practical Republic: Social Skills and the Progress of Citizenship. In Community in the Digital Age, eds. Feenberg, Andrew and Barney, Darin. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 201–24.
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2006. Cooperative Congressional Election Study, Common Content. [Computer File] Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. [producer] (Release 2: November 14, 2007).
Barnes, Samuel H., and Kaase, Max. 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Benkler, Yochai, Shaw, Aaron and Stodden, Victoria. Unpublished. A Tale of Two Blogospheres: Discursive Practices on the Left and Right. Cambridge MA: Berkman Center, Harvard.
Bimber, Bruce. 2000. The Study of Information Technology and Civic Engagement. Political Communication 17 (4): 329333.
Cohen, Josh. 1989. Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Legitimacy. In The Good Polity, eds. Hamlin, Alan and Pettit, Philip. Oxford: Blackwell, 1734.
Dahlgren, Peter. 2005. The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication 22 (2): 147–62.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dewey, John. 1954 [1927]. The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Drezner, Daniel, and Farrell, Henry. 2008. Introduction: Blogs, Politics and Power: A Special Issue of Public Choice. Public Choice 134(1): 113.
Farrell, Henry. 2009. “Partisanship and Extremism.” Cato Unbound.
Farrell, Henry, and Drezner, Daniel. 2008. The Power and Politics of Blogs. Public Choice 134(1): 1530.
Fishkin, James. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gelman, Andrew, Pasarica, Christian, and Dodhia, Rahul. 2002. Let's Practice What We Preach: Turning Tables into Graphs. The American Statistician 56(2): 121–30.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon.
Habermas, Jurgen. 2006a. Preisrede von Jürgen Habermas: anlässlich der Verleihung des Bruno-Kreisky-Preises für das politische Buch 2005. Renner Institut. (accessed February 25, 2009).
Habermas, Jurgen. 2006b. Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory 16(4): 411–26.
Hargittai, Eszter, Gallo, Jason, and Kane, Matthew. 2008. Cross-Ideological Discussion among Conservative and Liberal Bloggers. Public Choice 134(1): 6786.
Herring, S.C., Kouper, I., Paolillo, J.C., Scheidt, L.A., Tyworth, M., Welsch, P., Wright, E., and Yu, Ning. 2005. “Conversations in the Blogosphere: An Analysis “From the Bottom Up”.” System Sciences, 2005. HICSS '05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference.
Hetherington, Marc. 2001. Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization. American Political Science Review 95(3): 619–31.
Hindman, Matthew. 2008. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hintz, Jerry L., and Nelson, Ray D.. 1998. Violin Plots: A Box Plot-Density Trace Synergism. The American Statistician 52(2): 181–84.
Jacobson, Gary. 2007. “The War, the President, and the 2006 Midterm Congressional Elections.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Johnson, Thomas J., and Kaye, Barbara K.. 2004. Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs among Blog Users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81(3): 622–42.
Kastellec, Jonathan, and Leoni, Eduardo. 2007. Using Graphs Instead of Tables in Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 5(4): 755–71.
Knight, Jack and Johnson, James. n.d. “Politics, Institutions, and Justification: A Pragmatist Theory of Democracy.” unpublished manuscript.
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2007. “The Rationalizing Voter.” Working paper.
Macedo et al. 2005. Democracy at Risk. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Malhotra, Neil, and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2007. The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Samples. Political Analysis 15(3): 286323.
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Cook, James M.. 2001. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44.
Meraz, Sharon. 2007. The Networked Political Blogsphere and Mass Media: Understanding How Agendas are Formed, Framed, and Transferred in the Emerging New Media Environment. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Papachrissi, Zizi. 2002. The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere. New Media and Society 4(1): 927.
Perlmutter, David D. 2008. Blogwars. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pole, Antoinette, and McKenna, Laura. 2007. “Blogging Alone? Political Participation and the Blogosphere.” Working paper.
Polimetrix. 2005. “Polimetrix Validates Innovative Method of Online Sampling in California Special Election.” Polimetrix. (accessed 18 October 2007).
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rivers, Douglas. 2006. “Sample Matching: Representative Sampling from Internet Panels.” Polimetrix White Paper Series.
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 2009. “Responses on Political Theory, Idealism, and Extremism.” Cato Unbound.
Ruffini, Patrick. 2008. “Roots of Defeat.” National Review Online, December 1.
Sanders, David, Clarke, Harold D., Stewart, Marianne C., and Whiteley, Paul. 2007. Does Mode Matter for Modeling Political Choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study. Political Analysis 15(3): 257–85.
Shirky, Clay. 2003. Powerlaws, Weblogs and Inequality. Clay Skirky's Writings About the Internet.
Sides, John, and Gross, Kimberly. 2007. “Stereotypes of Muslims, Their Causes, and Their Consequences.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Sunstein, Cass. 2008. Neither Hayek nor Habermas, Public Choice 134(1): 8795.
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. Motivated Skepticism in Political Information Processing. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–69.
Theriault, Sean. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497520.
Vavreck, Lynn. 2007. The Exaggerated Effects of Advertising on Turnout: The Dangers of Self-Reports. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2(4): 297305.
Wallsten, Kevin. 2007. Political Blogs: Transmission Belts, Soapboxes, Mobilizers, or Conversation Starters. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 4(3): 1940.
Wojcieszak, Magdalena, and Mutz, Diana. 2009. Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? Journal of Communication 59(1): 4056.
Woodly, Deva. 2008. New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda-Setting, and Political Participation. Public Choice 134(1): 109123.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed