Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Testing the Implicit-Explicit Model of Racialized Political Communication

  • Gregory A. Huber (a1) and John S. Lapinski (a2)
Abstract

The Implicit-Explicit (IE) model of racial priming posits that implicitly racial messages will be more effective than explicitly racial ones in priming racial predispositions in opinion formation. Is the Implicit-Explicit model supported by existing data? In “Racial Priming Revived,” Mendelberg responds to our analysis of a pair of experiments in which we found that “that implicit appeals are no more effective than explicit ones in priming racial resentment in opinion formation.” In this note we demonstrate that the concerns raised about our experiments are unfounded. Further, we show that the existing work supporting the IE model suffers from serious limitations of experimental design and implementation. Cumulatively, we find that the evidence questioning the IE model is far stronger than the evidence that supports it.Gregory A. Huber is Associate Professor of Political Science and resident fellow, Institute for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University (gregory.huber@yale.edu). John S. Lapinski is Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania (lapins@sas.upenn.edu). They thank the numerous colleagues who provided valuable feedback on earlier drafts of this essay, including Alan Gerber, Don Green, Diana Mutz, Rogers Smith, Paul Sniderman and Lynn Vavreck.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Clinton, Joshua D., and John S.Lapinski. 2004. “Targeted” advertising and voter turnout: An experimental study of the 2000 presidential election. Journal of Politics66 (1): 6996.

Druckman, James N., and Justin W.Holmes. 2004. Does presidential rhetoric matter? Priming and presidential approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly34 (4): 75578.

Federico, Christopher M.2004. When do welfare attitudes become racialized? The paradoxical effects of education. American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 37491.

Gerber, Alan S., Donald P.Green, and DavidNickerson. 2001. Testing for publication bias in political science. Political Analysis9 (November): 38592.

Hutchings, Vincent. 2002. Review of The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality by Tali Mendelberg. American Political Science Review96 (3): 64748.

Mendelberg, Tali. 1997. Executing Hortons: Racial crime in the 1988 presidential campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly61 (1): 13457.

Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. When white voters evaluate black candidates: The processing implications of candidate skin color, prejudice, and self-monitoring. American Journal of Political Science37 (4Nov.): 103253.

Valentino, Nicholas A.2001. Review of The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality by Tali Mendelberg. Public Opinion Quarterly65 (4): 60710.

Valentino, Nicholas, VincentHutchings, and IsmailWhite. 2002. Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review96 (1): 7590.

White, Ismail K.2007. When race matters and when it doesn't: Racial group differences in response to racial cues. American Political Science Review101 (2): 33954.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 99 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.