Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Jackson, Galen 2015. The Showdown That Wasn't: U.S.-Israeli Relations and American Domestic Politics, 1973–75. International Security, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 130.

    Haglund, David G. and McNeil-Hay, Tyson 2011. The ‘Germany Lobby’ and US Foreign Policy: What, if Anything, Does It Tell Us about the Debate over the ‘Israel Lobby’?. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 10, Issue. 3-4, p. 321.

    Warner, Carolyn M. and Walker, Stephen G. 2011. Thinking about the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 113.

    Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen M. 2009. The Blind Man and the Elephant in the Room: Robert Lieberman and the Israel Lobby. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, Issue. 02, p. 259.


The “Israel Lobby” and American Politics

  • Robert C. Lieberman (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2009

In their recent book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt argue that American support for Israel does not serve American interests. Nevertheless, they observe that American foreign policy regarding the Middle East, especially in recent years, has tilted strongly toward support for Israel, and they attribute this support to the influence of the “Israel lobby” in American domestic politics. Their book is principally an attempt to make a causal argument about American politics and policymaking. I examine three aspects of this argument—its causal logic, the use of evidence to support hypotheses, and the argument's connection with the state of knowledge about American politics—and conclude that the case for the Israel lobby as the primary cause of American support for Israel is at best a weak one, although it points to a number of interesting questions about the mechanisms of power in American politics. Mearsheimer and Walt's propositions about the direct influence of the Israel lobby on Congress and the executive branch are generally not supported by theory or evidence. Less conclusive and more suggestive, however, are their arguments about the lobby's apparent influence on the terms and boundaries of legitimate debate and discussion of Israel and the Middle East in American policymaking. These directions point to an alternative approach to investigating the apparent influence of the Israel lobby in American politics, focusing less on direct, overt power over policy outcomes and more on more subtle pathways of influence over policy agendas and the terms of policy discourse.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

John H. Aldrich 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

John H. Aldrich , and David W. Rohde . 2000. The consequences of party organization in the House: The role of majority and minority parties in conditional party government. In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, ed. Jon Bond and Richard Fleisher . Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Stephen Ansolabehere , John M. de Figueiredo , and James M. Snyder Jr. 2003. Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 105–30.

Robert A. Dahl 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2: 201–15.

Thomas W. Gilligan , and Keith Krehbiel . 1989. Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 459–90.

Peter A. Hall 2003. Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lawrence R. Jacobs , and Benjamin I. Page . 2005. Who influences U.S. foreign policy? American Political Science Review 99 (1): 107–23.

Edward H. Kaplan , and Charles A. Small . 2006. Anti-Israel sentiment predicts anti-Semitism in Europe. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (4): 548–61.

Ira Katznelson . 2007. At the court of chaos: Political science in an age of perpetual fear. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 315.

Keith Krehbiel . 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Keith Krehbiel . 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Theodore J. Lowi 1972. Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298310.

Nolan McCarty , and Lawrence S. Rothenberg . 1996. Commitment and the campaign contribution contract. American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 872904.

Walter Russell Mead . 2006. God's country? Foreign Affairs 85 (5): 2443.

Jeffrey Milyo , David Primo , and Timothy Groseclose . 2000. Corporate PAC contributions in perspective. Business and Politics 2 (1): 7588.

Benjamin I. Page , and Robert Y. Shapiro . 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Paul Pierson . 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

David W. Rohde 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Thomas Romer , and Howard Rosenthal . 1978. Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Public Choice 33 (4): 2743.

Kenneth A. Shepsle , and Barry R. Weingast . 1981. Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice. Public Choice 37 (3): 503–19.

James M. Snyder Jr. 1990. Campaign contributions as investments: The House of Representatives, 1980–1986. Journal of Political Economy 98 (6): 1195–227.

James M. Snyder Jr. 1992. Long-term investing in politicians, or, Give early, give often. Journal of Law and Economics 35 (1): 1544.

James M. Snyder Jr. 1993. The market for campaign contributions: Evidence for the U.S. Senate, 1980–1986. Economics and Politics 5 (3): 219–40.

George Tsebelis . 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Christopher Uggen , and Jeff Manza . 2002. Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review 67 (6): 777803.

Gregory J. Wawro 2001. A panel probit analysis of campaign contributions and roll-call votes. American Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 563–79.

Barry R. Weingast , and William J. Marshall . 1988. The industrial organization of Congress; or, Why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets. Journal of Political Economy 96 (1): 132–63.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *