Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Politics of International Regime Complexity

  • Karen J. Alter (a1) and Sophie Meunier (a2)
Abstract

The increasing density of international regimes has contributed to the proliferation of overlap across agreements, conflicts among international obligations, and confusion regarding what international and bilateral obligations cover an issue. This symposium examines the consequences of this “international regime complexity” for subsequent politics. What analytical insights can be gained by thinking about any single agreement as being embedded in a larger web of international rules and regimes? Karen Alter and Sophie Meunier's introductory essay defines international regime complexity and identifies the mechanisms through which it may influence the politics of international cooperation. Short contributions analyze how international regime complexity affects politics in specific issue areas: trade (Christina Davis), linkages between human rights and trade (Emilie Hafner-Burton), intellectual property (Laurence Helfer), security politics (Stephanie Hofmann), refugee politics (Alexander Betts), and election monitoring (Judith Kelley). Daniel Drezner concludes by arguing that international regime complexity may well benefit the powerful more than others.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Kenneth Abbott , and Duncan Snidal . 1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1): 332.

Vinod Aggarwal , and Edward Fogarty . 2005. The limits of interregionalism: The EU and North America. Journal of European Integration 27 (3): 20.

Graham Alison . 1969. Conceptual models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review 63 (3): 689718.

Karen J. Alter , and Sophie Meunier . 2006. Banana splits: Nested and competing regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (3): 362–82.

Karen J. Alter , and Jeannette Vargas . 2000. Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies: EC law and UK gender equality policy. Comparative Political Studies 33 (4): 316–46.

L.A.N. Amaral , and J.M. Ottino . 2004. Complex networks: Augmenting the framework for the study of complex systems. European Physical Journal B 38: 147–62.

Robert Axelrod . 1997. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 24.

Clifford Bob . 2002. Merchants of morality. Foreign Policy March/April: 3645.

Yves Dezalay , and Bryant G. Garth . 2002. Global Prescriptions : The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Kevin J. Dooley , and Andrew H. Van de Ven . 1999. Perspective—Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organization Science : A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences 10 (3): 15.

Roger V. Gould 2003. Uses of network tools in comparative historical research. In Comparative Historic Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brooke Harrington , and Gary Fine . 2000. Opening the “black box”: Small groups and twenty-first century. Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (4): 312–23.

Brooke Harrington , and Gary Fine . 2006. Where the action is: Small groups and contemporary sociological theory. Small Group Research 37 (1): 116.

Laurence R. Helfer 1999. Forum shopping for human rights. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 285399.

Bryan D. Jones , Graeme Boushey , and Samual Workman . 2006. Behavioral rationality and the policy processes: Toward a new model of organizational information processing. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, ed. M. Moran , M. Rein , and R. E. Goodin . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Michael W. Macy , and Robert Willer . 2002. From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 143–66.

Michael Rask Madsen . 2007. From Cold War instrument to supreme European court: The European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads of international and national law and politics. Law & Social Inquiry 32 (1): 137–59.

Benoit Morel , and Rangaraj Ramanujam . 1999. Perspective—Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences 10 (3): 16.

Ami Pedahzur , and Arie Perliger . 2006. The changing nature of suicide attacks—A social network perspective. Social Forces 84 (4): 19872008.

Paul Pierson . 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Brian Uzzi . 1997a. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (March): 3567.

Brian Uzzi . 1997b. Towards a network perspective on organizational decline. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 17 (7/8): 111–55.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 28
Total number of PDF views: 507 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1215 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.