Skip to main content

The Politics of International Regime Complexity

  • Karen J. Alter (a1) and Sophie Meunier (a2)

The increasing density of international regimes has contributed to the proliferation of overlap across agreements, conflicts among international obligations, and confusion regarding what international and bilateral obligations cover an issue. This symposium examines the consequences of this “international regime complexity” for subsequent politics. What analytical insights can be gained by thinking about any single agreement as being embedded in a larger web of international rules and regimes? Karen Alter and Sophie Meunier's introductory essay defines international regime complexity and identifies the mechanisms through which it may influence the politics of international cooperation. Short contributions analyze how international regime complexity affects politics in specific issue areas: trade (Christina Davis), linkages between human rights and trade (Emilie Hafner-Burton), intellectual property (Laurence Helfer), security politics (Stephanie Hofmann), refugee politics (Alexander Betts), and election monitoring (Judith Kelley). Daniel Drezner concludes by arguing that international regime complexity may well benefit the powerful more than others.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Politics of International Regime Complexity
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Politics of International Regime Complexity
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Politics of International Regime Complexity
      Available formats
Hide All
Abbott Kenneth, and Snidal Duncan. 1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1): 332.
Abbott Kenneth, and Snidal Duncan. 2003. Pathways to international cooperation. In The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation, ed. Benvenisti E. and Hirsch M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aggarwal Vinod K. 1998. Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Aggarwal Vinod, and Fogarty Edward. 2005. The limits of interregionalism: The EU and North America. Journal of European Integration 27 (3): 20.
Aggarwal Vinod K., and Morrison Charles E., eds. 2001. Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC.
Aggarwal Vinod K., and Spiegel Mark M.. 1997. Debt games: Strategic interaction in international debt rescheduling. Journal of Economic Literature 35 (4): 1.
Alison Graham. 1969. Conceptual models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review 63 (3): 689718.
Alter Karen J., and Meunier Sophie. 2006. Banana splits: Nested and competing regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (3): 362–82.
Alter Karen J., and Vargas Jeannette. 2000. Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies: EC law and UK gender equality policy. Comparative Political Studies 33 (4): 316–46.
Amaral L.A.N., and Ottino J.M.. 2004. Complex networks: Augmenting the framework for the study of complex systems. European Physical Journal B 38: 147–62.
Axelrod Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Axelrod Robert. 1997. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 24.
Axelrod Robert, and Keohane Robert. 1986. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. In Cooperation Under Anarchy, ed. Oye K.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barnett Michael, and Finnemore Martha. 1999. The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization 53 (4): 699732.
Barnett Michael, and Finnemore Martha. 2004. Rules for the World : International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press.
Bob Clifford. 2002. Merchants of morality. Foreign Policy March/April: 3645.
Busch Marc L. 2007. Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade. International Organization 61 (4): 735–61.
Carpenter Charli. 2007. Studying issue (non)-adoption in transnational advocacy networks. International Organization 61 (3): 643–67.
Cogan Jacob Katz. 2008. Competition and control in international adjudication. Virgina Journal of International Law 48 (2): 411–49.
Cohen Antonin, and Madsen Michael Rask. 2007. Cold War law: Legal entrepreneurs and the emergence of a European legal field (1946–1965). In European Ways of Law, ed. Gessner V. and Nelken D.. Oxford: Hard.
Davis Christina. 2007. Forum choice in trade disputes: WTO adjudication, negotiation, and U.S. trade policy. In Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Dezalay Yves, and Garth Bryant G.. 2002. Global Prescriptions : The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Diehl Paul F., Ku Charlotte, and Zamora Daniel. 2003. The dynamics of international law: The international of normative and operating systems. International Organization 57: 4375.
Dooley Kevin J., and Van de Ven Andrew H.. 1999. Perspective—Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organization Science : A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences 10 (3): 15.
Evans Peter B., Jacobson Harold K., and Putnam Robert D.. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gould Roger V. 2003. Uses of network tools in comparative historical research. In Comparative Historic Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Mahoney J. and Rueschemeyer D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haas Ernst. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Haas Ernst. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of change in International Organizations, Studies in International Political Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haas Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 136.
Hafner-Burton Emilie M. 2004. “Forum Shopping for Human Rights: The Transformation of Preferential Trade.” Presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, September 1–4.
Harrington Brooke, and Fine Gary. 2000. Opening the “black box”: Small groups and twenty-first century. Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (4): 312–23.
Harrington Brooke, and Fine Gary. 2006. Where the action is: Small groups and contemporary sociological theory. Small Group Research 37 (1): 116.
Hawkins Darren, and Jacoby Wade. 2006. How agents matter. In Delegation under Anarchy: Principals, Agents and International Organizations, ed. Hawkins D., Lake D. A., Nielson D., and Tierney M. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins Darren, Neilson Daniel, Tierney Michael J., and Lake David A.. 2006. Delegation under Anarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Helfer Laurence R. 1999. Forum shopping for human rights. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 285399.
Helfer Laurence R. 2004. Regime shifting: The TRIPS agreement and the new dynamics of international intellectual property making. Yale Journal of International Law 29: 181.
Hirschman Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty; Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jacobs Alan, and Teles Steven. 2007. The perils of market-making: The case of British pensions. In Creating Competitive Markets: The Politics of Regulatory Reform, ed. Landy M. K., Levin M. A., and Shapiro M. M.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Janis Irving Lester. 1972. Victims of Groupthink; A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton.
Jones Bryan D., Boushey Graeme, and Workman Samual. 2006. Behavioral rationality and the policy processes: Toward a new model of organizational information processing. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, ed. Moran M., Rein M., and Goodin R. E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jupille Joseph, and Snidal Duncan. 2006. “The Choice of International Institutions: Cooperation, Alternatives and Strategies.” July 7. Available at SSRN:
Katzenstein Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets : Industrial Policy in Europe. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Keck Margaret E., and Sikkink Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kingsbury Benedict. 1999. Is the proliferation of international courts and tribunals a systemic problem? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31: 679–96.
Macy Michael W., and Willer Robert. 2002. From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 143–66.
Madsen Michael Rask. 2007. From Cold War instrument to supreme European court: The European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads of international and national law and politics. Law & Social Inquiry 32 (1): 137–59.
Mansfield Edward, and Reinhardt Eric. 2003. Multilateral determinants of regionalism: The effects of GATT/WTO on the formation of preferential trading arrangements. International Organization 57 (4): 829–62.
Morel Benoit, and Ramanujam Rangaraj. 1999. Perspective—Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences 10 (3): 16.
Newman Abraham. 2008. Building transnational civil liberties: Transgovernmental entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive. International Organization 62 (1): 103–30.
Pedahzur Ami, and Perliger Arie. 2006. The changing nature of suicide attacks—A social network perspective. Social Forces 84 (4): 19872008.
Pierson Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Powers Kathy, Goertz Gary, Willerton John P., and Vashchilko Tatiana. 2007. “Treaty Nestedness and Complex Security Institutions” July 7, available at SSRN:
Putnam Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics; the logic of two level games. International Organization 42 (3): 427–60.
Ragin Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Raustiala Kal, and Victor David. 2004. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277309.
Sikkink Kathryn. 2003. International law and social movements: Towards transformation—A typology of relations between social movements and international institutions. American Society of International Legal Proceedings 97 (2003): 301–05.
Slaughter Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Snyder Jack L., and Jervis Robert. 1993. Coping with Complexity in the International System. Pew Studies in Economics and Security. Boulder: Westview Press.
Uzzi Brian. 1997a. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (March): 3567.
Uzzi Brian. 1997b. Towards a network perspective on organizational decline. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 17 (7/8): 111–55.
Walders Lawrence W., and Pratt Neil C.. 2003. Trade remedy litigation—Choice of forum and choice of law. Saint Johns Journal of Legal Commentary 18 (fall): 5174.
Waltz Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Watts Duncan J. 2003. Six Degrees : The Science of a Connected Age. 1st ed.New York: Norton.
Young Oran. 1996. Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance 2 (1): 124.
Zanini Michele. 2002. Middle Eastern terrorism and netwar. Peace Research Abstracts 39 (2): 155306.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 39
Total number of PDF views: 1123 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2519 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.