Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S.

  • Gary Miller (a1) and Norman Schofield (a2)
Abstract

Because the space of policies is two-dimensional, parties in the United States are coalitions of opposed interests. The Republican Party contains both socially conservative and socially liberal groups, though both tend to be pro-business. The increasing dominance of the social conservatives has angered some prominent Republicans, even causing a number of them to change party allegiance. Over time, the decreasing significance of the economic axis may cause the Republican Party to adopt policies that are analogous to those proposed by William Jennings Bryan in 1896: populist and anti-business. In parallel, the Democratic Party will increasingly appeal to pro-business, social liberals, so the party takes on the mantel of Lincoln.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aldrich, J. H. 1983a. A spatial model with party activists: Implications for electoral dynamics. Public Choice 41: 63100.
Aldrich, J. H. 1983b. A Downsian spatial model with party activists. American Political Science Review 77 (3): 974–90.
Bass, Jack, and Thompson, Marilyn W.. 1998. Ol' Strom: An Unauthorized Biography. Atlanta: Longstreet Press.
Branch, Taylor. 1988. Parting the Waters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Branch, Taylor. 1998. Pillar of Fire. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Branch, Taylor. 2006. At Canaan's Edge. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Buchanan, Patrick. 1998. The Great Betrayal: How American Sovereignty and Social Justice Are Being Sacrificed to the Gods of the Global Economy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Buchanan, Patrick. 1999. A Republic, Not an Empire. Washington, DC: Regnery.
Carter, Dan T. 2000. The Politics of Rage: George Wallace and the Origins of the New Conservatism, and the Transformation of American Politics. 2d ed.Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
Danforth, John. 2005. “In the Name of Politics.” New York Times, March 30.
Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Free Internet Press. 2006. “Senate Immigration Deal Faltering,” April 7.
Frum, David. 1994. Dead Right. New York: Basic Books.
Gore, Al. 2007. The Assault on Reason. London: Bloomsbury.
Gray, John. 2007. Black Mass. London: Penguin.
Hinich, Melvin. J. 1977. Equilibrium in spatial voting: The median voter theorem is an artifact. Journal of Economic Theory 16 (2): 208–19.
Kazin, M. 2006. A Godly Hero. New York: Knopf.
Kirkland, Richard I. Jr. 2005. “Today's GOP: The Party's Over for Big Business.” Fortune, February 6.
Kirkpatrick, David D. 2006. “Demonstrations on Immigration Harden a Divide.” New York Times, April 17.
Lasch, Christopher. 1991. The True and Only Heaven: Progress and Its Critics. New York: Norton.
Merrill, Samuel III, Grofman, Bernard, and Brunell, Thomas L.. 2008. Cycles in American national electoral politics. American Political Science Review 102 (1): 117.
Milburn, John. 2006. “Former GOP Chairman Parkinson Switches Affiliation to Democrat.” Kansas City Star, May 30.
Miller, Gary, and Schofield, Norman. 2003. Activism and partisan realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review 97 (2): 245–60.
Nichols, David. 2007. A Matter of Justice. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Phillips, Kevin. 1969. The Emerging Republican Majority. New Rochelle: Arlington House.
Phillips, Kevin. 2006. American Theocracy. London: Penguin.
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. U.S. presidential elections 1968–1980: A spatial analysis. American Journal of Political Science 28 (2): 283312.
Schaller, Tom. 2006. Whistling Past Dixie. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Schnidman, Evan A. 2008. “Spatial Modeling of the U.S. Presidential Primary Candidates.” M.A. diss., Washington University in St. Louis.
Schofield, Norman. 2006. Equilibria in the spatial stochastic model of voting with party activists. Review of Economic Design 10 (3): 183203.
Schofield, Norman. 2007. The mean voter theorem: Necessary and sufficient conditions for convergent equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 74 (3): 965–80.
Schofield, Norman, and Miller, Gary. 2007. Elections and activist coalitions in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 518–31.
Schofield, Norman, Miller, Gary, and Martin, Andrew. 2003. Critical elections and political realignment in the US: 1860–2000. Political Studies 51 (3): 217–40.
Schofield, Norman, and Sened, Itai. 2006. Multiparty Democracy: Elections and Legislative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Jeff. 2005. “Trading Places: The Two Parties in the Electorate from 1975–2004.” Ph.D. diss., Washington University in St. Louis.
“Stem Cell Proposal Splits Missouri G.O.P.” 2006. New York Times, March 12.
Stokes, Donald. 1963. Spatial models and party competition. American Political Science Review 57 (3): 368–77.
Stokes, Donald. 1992. Valence politics. In Electoral Politics, ed. Kavanagh, D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wallis, Jim. 2005. God's Politics. New York: Harper..
Westen, Drew. 2007. The Political Brain. New York: Public Affairs.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed