Skip to main content
×
×
Home

What do Women Really Know? A Gendered Analysis of Varieties of Political Knowledge

  • Dietlind Stolle (a1) and Elisabeth Gidengil (a2)
Abstract

While studies typically find that women know less about politics than do men, feminist scholars have argued that these findings reflect gender-biased measures that underestimate women's political knowledge. This article evaluates the feminist critique by taking a more expansive view of what constitutes political knowledge. Using data from a large Canadian urban sample, we show that gender gaps close or even reverse when people are queried about more practical aspects of political knowledge, such as government benefits and services. Our results also demonstrate that this type of knowledge is more equally distributed than its conventional counterpart, though the women who are the most likely to need government services and benefits are often the least likely to know about them. Finally, we show that knowledge of government services and benefits has a significant effect on women's intended vote choice. This article thus shows that more practical types of political knowledge might serve as meaningful additions to existing definitions and measures of political knowledge.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Baker, Paula. 1984. The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society, 1780–1920. The American Historical Review 89 (3): 620–47.
Bennett, Linda, and Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1989. Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest. American Politics Research 17 (1): 105–22.
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nadeau, Richard, and Nevitte, Neil. 2002. Anatomy of a Liberal Victory: Making Sense of the 2000 Canadian Election. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Butt, Sarah. 2004. Political Knowledge and Routes to Party Choice in the British General Election of 2001. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 14 (1): 317.
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Campbell, Rosie. 2004. Gender, Ideology and Issue Preference: Is There such a Thing as a Political Women's Interest in Britain? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 2044.
Chaney, Carol K., Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. Explaining the Gender Gap in US Presidential Elections, 1980–1992. Political Research Quarterly 51 (2): 311–39.
Claibourn, Michele, and Sapiro, Virginia. 2002. “Gender Differences in Citizen-Level Democratic Citizenship: Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems.” Presented at the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems meeting, Berlin, February.
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2007. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences and Priorities.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 12.
Dalager, Jon K. 1996. Voters, Issues, and Elections: Are the Candidates' Messages Getting Through? Journal of Politics 58 (2): 486515.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1991. Stability and Change in the U.S. Public's Knowledge of Politics. Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (4): 583612.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1993. Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First. American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 11791206.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 2000. Gender and Political Knowledge. In Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process, ed. Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue and Josephson, Jyl J.. New York: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 2145.
Dow, Jay. 2008. Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Characteristics-Based and Returns-Based Differences. In Political Behavior —online version. In press.
Fournier, Patrick. 2002. The Uninformed Canadian Voter. In Citizen Politics: Research and Theory in Canadian Political Behaviour, ed. Everitt, Joanna and O'Neill, Brenda. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
Frazer, Elizabeth, and Macdonald, Kenneth. 2003. Sex Differences in Political Knowledge in Britain. Political Studies 51 (1): 6783.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nevitte, Neil, and Nadeau, Richard. 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Hennigar, Matthew, Blais, André, and Nevitte, Neil 2005. Explaining the Gender Gap in Support for the New Right: The Case of Canada. Comparative Political Studies 38 (10): 125.
Gilens, Martin. 2001. Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (2): 379–96.
Hibbs, Douglas. 1977. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review 71 (4): 1467–87.
Hooghe, Marc, Quintelier, Ellen, and Reeskens, Tim. 2006. How Political is the Personal? Gender Differences in the Level and the Structure of Political Knowledge. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (2): 115–25.
Huber, John, and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies. Party Politics 1 (1): 73111.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Kathleen B., and Jónasdóttir, Anna G.. 1988. The Political Interests of Gender: Developing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. London: Sage.
Kaufmann, Karen M., and Petrocik, Jon R.. 1999. The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap. American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87.
Kenski, Kate, and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2000. The Gender Gap in Political Knowledge: Are Women Less Knowledgeable Than men About Politics? In Everything You Think You Know about Politics … And Why You're Wrong, ed. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. New York: Basic Books.
Krosnick, Jon A., Lupia, Arthur, De Bell, Matthew, and Donakowski, Darrell. 2008. Problems with ANES Questions Measuring Political Knowledge, http://www.electionstudies.org/announce/newsltr/20080324PoliticalKnowledgeMemo.pdf, accessed June 8, 2009.
Lister, Ruth. 1997. Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis. Feminist Review 50 (3): 2848.
Lupia, Arthur. 2006. How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence. Critical Review 18 (1–3): 217–32.
Lupia, Arthur. n.d. Questioning Our Competence: Tasks, Institutions, and the Limited Practical Relevance of Common Political Knowledge Measures. Unpublished manuscript http://www.personal.umich.edu/~lupia/questioning.pdf
Luskin, Robert. 1990. Explaining Political Sophistication. Political Behavior 12 (4): 331–62.
Mettler, Suzanne. 2007. Bringing Government Back into Civic Engagement: Considering the Role of Public Policy. International Journal of Public Administration 30 (6): 643–50.
Mettler, Suzanne, and Soss, Joe. 2004. The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics 2(1): 5573.
Mondak, Jeffrey. 2001. Developing Valid Knowledge Scales. American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 224–38.
Mondak, Jeffrey J., and Anderson, Mary R.. 2004. The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge. Journal of Politics 66 (2): 492512.
Nadeau, Richard, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1995. Educated Guesses: The Process of Answering Factual Knowledge Questions in Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 59 (3): 323–46.
Neumayer, Eric. 2004. The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics. Ecological Economics 51 (3): 167–75.
Nevitte, Neil, Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nadeau, Richard. 2000. Unsteady State: The 1997 Canadian Federal Election. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Palfrey, Thomas R., and Poole, Keith T.. 1987. The Relationship between Information, Ideology, and Voting Behaviour. American Journal of Political Science 31(3): 511–30.
Phillips, Katherin Ross. 2001. The Earned Income Tax Credit: Knowledge is Money. Political Science Quarterly 116(3): 413–24
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45 (4): 595628.
Piven, Frances Fox. 1990. Ideology and the State: Women, Power and the Welfare State. In Women, the State, and Welfare, ed. Gordon, Linda. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Prior, Markus, and Lupia, Arthur. 2008. Money, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall and Political Learning Skills. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 169–83.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Mahajan, Harpeet. 1986. Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 4261.
Smiley, Marion. 1999. Democratic Citizenship: A Question of Competence? In Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, ed. Elkin, Stephen L. and Soltan, Karol Edward. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Smith, Lauren A., Wise, Paul H., and Wampler, Nina S.. 2002. Knowledge of Welfare Reform Program Provisions Among Families of Children with Chronic Conditions. American Journal of Public Health 92 (2): 228–30.
Soss, Joe. 1999. Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action. American Political Science Review 93 (2): 363–80.
Statistics Canada. 2006. Women in Canada: A Gender-Based Statistical Report, 5th edition http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-503-x/89-503-x2005001-eng.pdf, accessed December 29, 2008.
Stokes-Brown, Atiya Kai, and Nea, Melissa Olivia. 2008. Give 'Em Something to Talk about: The Influence of Female Candidates' Campaign Issues on Political Proselytizing. Politics and Policy 36 (1): 3259.
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. A More Level Playing Field or a New Mobilization of Bias? Interest Groups and Advocacy for the Disadvantaged. In Interest Group Politics, ed. Gigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett A.. Washington: CQ Press.
Stuber, Jennifer, and Bradley, Elizabeth. 2005. Barriers to Medicaid Enrollment: Who is at Risk. American Journal of Public Health 95 (2): 292–98.
Sturgis, Patrick, Allum, Nick, and Smith, Patten. 2008. An Experiment on the Measurement of Political Knowledge in Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access, 113.
Tichenor, Phillip J., Donohue, George A., and Olien, Clarice N.. 1970. Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 34 (2): 159–70.
Tong, J. 2003. The Gender Gap in Political Culture and Participation in China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 36 (2): 131–50, accessed May 2008.
Van der Brug, Wouter, Fennema, Meindert, and Tillie, Jean. 2000. Anti-Immigrant Parties in Europe: Ideological or Protest Vote? European Journal of Political Research 37 (1): 77102.
Van der Brug, Wouter, and Mughan, Anthony. 2007. Charisma, Leader Effects and Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties. Party Politics 13 (1): 2951.
Van der Eijk, Cees, and Franklin, Mark. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1997. Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement. Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–72.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Stolle supplementary material
Supplementary table 3

 Word (29 KB)
29 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Stolle supplementary material
Supplementary table 1

 Word (39 KB)
39 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Stolle supplementary material
Supplementary table 2

 Word (28 KB)
28 KB
EXCEL
Supplementary materials

Stolle supplementary material
Summary data

 Excel (24 KB)
24 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Stolle supplementary material
Explanatory file

 Word (79 KB)
79 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed