Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Pradeu, Thomas
2016.
The many faces of biological individuality.
Biology & Philosophy,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 6,
p.
761.
Stencel, Adrian
and
Proszewska, Agnieszka M.
2018.
How Research on Microbiomes is Changing Biology: A Discussion on the Concept of the Organism.
Foundations of Science,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
603.
Pradeu, Thomas
2019.
Philosophy of Immunology.
Smith‐Ferguson, Jules
and
Beekman, Madeleine
2019.
Can't see the colony for the bees: behavioural perspectives of biological individuality.
Biological Reviews,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 6,
p.
1935.
Sinclair, Rebekah
2020.
Exploding Individuals: Engaging Indigenous Logic and Decolonizing Science.
Hypatia,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 1,
p.
58.
Suárez, Javier
and
Stencel, Adrian
2020.
A part‐dependent account of biological individuality: why holobionts are individuals
and
ecosystems simultaneously
.
Biological Reviews,
Vol. 95,
Issue. 5,
p.
1308.
Kaiser, Marie I.
and
Trappes, Rose
2021.
Broadening the problem agenda of biological individuality: individual differences, uniqueness and temporality.
Biology & Philosophy,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 2,
Stencel, Adrian
and
Wloch-Salamon, Dominika
2022.
A pluralistic view of holobionts in the context of process ontology.
Frontiers in Microbiology,
Vol. 13,
Issue. ,
Trappes, Rose
2022.
Individual differences, uniqueness, and individuality in behavioural ecology.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 96,
Issue. ,
p.
18.
Nowak, Piotr Grzegorz
and
Stencel, Adrian
2022.
How many ways can you die? Multiple biological deaths as a consequence of the multiple concepts of an organism.
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
127.
Gouvêa, Devin Y.
and
Brigandt, Ingo
2023.
Against unifying homology concepts: Redirecting the debate.
Journal of Morphology,
Vol. 284,
Issue. 7,
McConwell, Alison K.
2023.
Biological Individuality.
Nahas, Auguste
and
Sachs, Carl
2023.
What’s at stake in the debate over naturalizing teleology? An overlooked metatheoretical debate.
Synthese,
Vol. 201,
Issue. 4,