Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Haig, Brian D.
2008.
On the permissiveness of the abductive theory of method.
Journal of Clinical Psychology,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 9,
p.
1037.
Duschl, Richard
and
Ellenbogen, Kirsten
2009.
Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria: Investigating Learners’ Reasons for Reasons.
Educación Química,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
111.
Thagard, Paul
and
Findlay, Scott
2010.
Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science.
p.
329.
Keil, Frank C.
2010.
WHEN AND WHY DO HEDGEHOGS AND FOXES DIFFER?.
Critical Review,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
415.
Koponen, Ismo T.
and
Pehkonen, Maija
2010.
Coherent Knowledge Structures of Physics Represented as Concept Networks in Teacher Education.
Science & Education,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
259.
Hunt, Shelby D.
2011.
Theory Status, Inductive Realism, and Approximate Truth: No Miracles, No Charades.
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
159.
Campaner, Raffaella
2011.
Understanding mechanisms in the health sciences.
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 1,
p.
5.
Clark, Douglas B.
D'Angelo, Cynthia M.
and
Schleigh, Sharon P.
2011.
Comparison of Students' Knowledge Structure Coherence and Understanding of Force in the Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States.
Journal of the Learning Sciences,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
207.
Sobrino, A.
Olivas, J. A.
and
Puente, C.
2011.
Mining answers for causal questions in a medical example.
p.
432.
Snowden, Austyn
and
Atkinson, John
2012.
Concurrent analysis: a pragmatic justification.
Nursing Philosophy,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
126.
Hollins Martin, Caroline J.
Snowden, Austyn
and
Martin, Colin R.
2012.
Concurrent analysis: validation of the domains within the Birth Satisfaction Scale.
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 3,
p.
247.
Gagliardi, Francesco
2012.
A Cognitive Approach to Scientific Data Mining for Syndrome Discovery.
International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
THAGARD, PAUL
2012.
COHERENCE: THE PRICE IS RIGHT.
The Southern Journal of Philosophy,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 1,
p.
42.
Campaner, Raffaella
and
Galavotti, Maria Carla
2012.
Evidence and the Assessment of Causal Relations in the Health Sciences.
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 1,
p.
27.
Parnafes, Orit
2012.
Developing Explanations and Developing Understanding: Students Explain the Phases of the Moon Using Visual Representations.
Cognition and Instruction,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 4,
p.
359.
Amaya, Amalia
2012.
Ten Theses on Coherence and Law.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Marchionni, Caterina
2012.
Philosophy of Economics.
p.
425.
Cordero, Alberto
2013.
Reflections on Naturalism.
p.
61.
Duschl, Richard A.
and
Grandy, Richard
2013.
Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science.
Science & Education,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 9,
p.
2109.
Reitsma, Femke
2013.
Revisiting the ‘Is GIScience a science?’ debate (or quite possibly scientific gerrymandering).
International Journal of Geographical Information Science,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
211.