Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:54:36.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergence and Quantum Mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Frederick M. Kronz  and
Justin T. Tiehen
Frederick M. Kronz
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin
Justin T. Tiehen*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin
*
Send requests for reprints to one of the authors, Department of Philosophy, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712–1180; email: kronz@mail.utexas.edu or j.tiehen@mail.utexas.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent article Humphreys has developed an intriguing proposal for making sense of emergence. The crucial notion for this purpose is what he calls “fusion” and his paradigm for it is quantum nonseparability. In what follows, we will develop this position in more detail, and then discuss its ramifications and limitations. Its ramifications are quite radical; its limitations are substantial. An alternative approach to emergence that involves quantum physics is then proposed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 324 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

We wish to thank Paul Humphreys for very helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this essay. We also wish to thank two anonymous referees for Philosophy of Science for their helpful suggestions.

References

Amann, Anton, and Müller-Herold, Ulrich (1999), “Fragments of an Algebraic Quantum Mechanics Program for Theoretical Chemistry”, in Atmanspacher, H., Amann, A., and Müller-Herold, U. (eds.), On Quanta, Mind and Matter. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 39–51.10.1007/978-94-011-4581-7_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, P. W., and Friedman, R. S. (1997), Molecular Quantum Mechanics, Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bader, Richard F. W. (1990), Atoms in Molecules. A Quantum Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gasiorowicz, Stephen (1974), Quantum Physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hendry, Robin Findlay (forthcoming), “Chemistry and the Completeness of Physics” in Cachro, J., Hanuszewicz, S., Kurczewski, G., and Rojszczak, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Hendry, Robin Findlay (1998), “Models and Approximations in Quantum Chemistry”, in Shanks, Niall (ed.), Idealization IX: Idealization in Contemporary Physics. Atlanta: Rodopi, 123–142.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (1997), “How Properties Emerge”, How Properties Emerge 64:1–17.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (1998), Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4629.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Ira N. (2000), Quantum Chemistry. , 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Margenau, H. (1950), The Nature of Physical Reality: a Philosophy of Modern Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian P. (1992), “The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism”, in Beckerman, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction: Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 49–93.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, Donald A. (1983), Quantum Chemistry. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, J. F. (1994), “The Nature of the Chemical Bond 1993. There Are No Such Things as Orbitals!”, in Kryachko, E. S. and Calais, J. L. (eds.), Conceptual Trends in Quantum Chemistry, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 171–198.10.1007/978-94-011-0852-2_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, Peter (1980), Chiral Molecules—a Superselection Role Induced by the Radiation Field, Thesis ETH-Zürich No. 6551, ok Gotthard S+D AG.Google Scholar
Primas, Hans (1983), Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics, and Reductionism. Perspectives in Theoretical Chemistry. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-69365-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, Paul (1989), “Relativity, Relational Holism, and the Bell Inequalities,” in Cushing, J. T. and McMullin, E. (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press, 208–223.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1991), Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198239807.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, R. G. (1991), “Quantum Chemistry Beyond the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation”, Quantum Chemistry Beyond the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation 230:17–46.Google Scholar