Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-vpzxz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-05T07:52:35.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Nature in a Post-essentialist World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Grant Ramsey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this essay I examine a well-known articulation of human nature skepticism, a paper by Hull. I then review a recent reply to Hull by Machery, which argues for an account of human nature that he claims is both useful and scientifically robust. I challenge Machery’s account and introduce an alternative account—the “life-history trait cluster” conception of human nature—that I hold is scientifically sound and makes sense of (at least some of) our intuitions about—and desiderata for—human nature.

Information

Type
General Philosophy of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 80 , Issue 5 , December 2013 , pp. 983 - 993
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

I thank Patrick Bateson, Andreas De Block, Michael Deem, Agustin Fuentes, Edouard Machery, and Charles Pence for their comments.

References

Bateson, P., and Mameli, M.. 2007. “The Innate and the Acquired: Useful Clusters or a Residual Distinction from Folk Biology?” Developmental Psychobiology 49:818–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, R. 1999. “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. Wilson, Robert A., 141–85. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1986. “On Human Nature.” In PSA 1986: Proceedings of the 1986 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, Symposia and Invited Papers, 3–13. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Lehrman, D. S. 1953. “A Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinctive Behavior.” Quarterly Review of Biology 28 (4): 337–63..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, D. K. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Machery, E. 2008. “A Plea for Human Nature.” Philosophical Psychology 21 (3): 321–29..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. 1961. History as a System and Other Essays toward a Philosophy of History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ramsey, G. 2012. “How Human Nature Can Inform Human Enhancement: A Commentary on Lewens’s Human Nature: The Very Idea.” Philosophy and Technology 25:479–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar