Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-gx6zg Total loading time: 0.322 Render date: 2023-02-02T17:54:35.640Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English
Philosophy of Science Philosophy of Science

Article contents

On the Genealogy of Norms: A Case for the Role of Emotion in Cultural Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Shaun Nichols
Shaun Nichols*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, College of Charleston
*
Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424–0001; nichols@cofc.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One promising way to investigate the genealogy of norms is by considering not the origin of norms, but rather what makes certain norms more likely to prevail. Emotional responses, I maintain, constitute one important set of mechanisms that affects the cultural viability of norms. To corroborate this, I exploit historical evidence indicating that sixteenth-century etiquette norms prohibiting disgusting actions were much more likely to survive than other sixteenth-century etiquette norms. This case suggests more broadly that research on cultural evolution should pay greater attention to the role of emotion systems in cultural transmission.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 234 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank Todd Grantham, Luc Faucher, Todd Jones, Ron Mallon, and three anonymous referees for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

Alexander, Richard (1987), The Biology of Moral Systems. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Atran, Scott (1998), “Folk Biology and the Anthropology of Science: Cognitive Universals and Cultural Particulars”, Folk Biology and the Anthropology of Science: Cognitive Universals and Cultural Particulars 21:547–609.Google ScholarPubMed
Axelrod, Robert (1986), “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms”, An Evolutionary Approach to Norms 80:1095–1111.Google Scholar
Ayala, Francisco (1987), “The Biological Roots of Morality”, The Biological Roots of Morality 2:235–252.Google Scholar
Ayala, Francisco (1995), “The Difference of Being Human: Ethical Behavior as an Evolutionary Byproduct”, in Rolston, Holmes (ed.), Biology, Ethics, and the Origins of Life. Boston: Jones & Bartlett, 113–135.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth (1934), Patterns of Culture. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Boehm, Christopher (1999), Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bower, Gordon (1994), “Some Relations between Emotion and Memory”, in Ekman, Paul and Davidson, Richard J. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press, 303–305.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter (1992), “Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizeable Groups”, Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizeable Groups 13:171–195.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal (1994), “Cognitive Constraints on Cultural Representations: Natural Ontologies and Religious Ideas”, in Hirschfeld, Lawrence A. and Gelman, Susan A. (eds.), Mapping the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Pascal (1999), “Cognitive Tracks of Cultural Inheritance: How Evolved Intuitive Ontology Governs Cultural Transmission”, Cognitive Tracks of Cultural Inheritance: How Evolved Intuitive Ontology Governs Cultural Transmission 100:876–889.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal (2000), “Evolution of the Modern Mind and the Origins of Culture: Religious Concepts as a Limiting Case”, in Carruthers, Peter and Chamberlain, Andrew (eds.), Evolution and the Human Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Richard (1959), Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Chagnon, Napoleon (1992), Yanomamo, 4th edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Christianson, Sven (1997), “On Emotional Stress and Memory”, in Payne, David G. and Conrad, Frederick G. (eds.), Intersections in Basic and Applied Memory Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Christianson, Sven, and Engelberg, Elisabeth (1999), “Organization of Emotional Memories”, in Dalgleish, Tim and Power, Mick J. (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Christianson, Sven, and Loftus, Elaine (1991), “Remembering Emotional Events”, Remembering Emotional Events 5:81–108.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1871), The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard (1976), The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
de Sahagun, Bernardino (1981), Florentine Codex: General History of the Things of New Spain. Book 2: The Ceremonies. Translated by Anderson, A. and Dibble, C.. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1995), Darwin's Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul (1994), “All Emotions Are Basic”, in Ekman, Paul and Davidson, Richard J. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press, 15–19.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert ([1939] 2000), The Civilizing Process. Translated by Jephcott, Edmund. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius ([1530] 1985), On Good Manners for Boys. Translated by McGregor, Brian. Vol. 25 of Sowards, J. (ed.), Collected Works of Erasmus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert (1988), Passions within Reason. New York: W. H. Norton.Google Scholar
Furnivall, Frederick (ed.) (1869), Queene Elizabethes Achademy, A Booke of Precedence, &c. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Garcia, John (1990), “Learning without Memory”, Learning without Memory 2:298–305.Google ScholarPubMed
Haidt Jonathan, Clark McCauley, and Rozin, Paul (1994), “Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Disgust”, Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Disgust 16:701–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuer, Friderike, and Reisberg, Daniel (1992), “Emotion, Arousal, and Memory for Detail”, in Christianson, Sven-Åke (ed.), The Handbook of Emotion and Memory: Research and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 151–179.Google Scholar
Kebeck, Guenther, and Lohaus, Arnold (1986), “Effect of Emotional Arousal on Free Recall of Complex Material”, Effect of Emotional Arousal on Free Recall of Complex Material 63:461–462.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1990), “Developmental Decomposition and the Future of Human Behavioral Ecology”, Developmental Decomposition and the Future of Human Behavioral Ecology 57:96–117.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1994), “Four Ways of ‘Biologicizing’ Ethics”, in Sober, Elliott (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kleinsmith, Lewis, and Kaplan, Stephen (1963), “Paired-Associate Learning as a Function of Arousal and Interpolated Interval”, Paired-Associate Learning as a Function of Arousal and Interpolated Interval 65:190–193.Google ScholarPubMed
Mallon, Ronald, and Stich, Stephen (2000), “The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology”, The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology 67:133–154.Google Scholar
Miller Robert, James Banks, and Ogawa, Nobuya (1963), “Role of Facial Expression in ‘Cooperative-Avoidance Conditioning’ in Monkeys”, Role of Facial Expression in ‘Cooperative-Avoidance Conditioning’ in Monkeys 67:24–30.Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun (2001), “Mindreading and the Cognitive Architecture Underlying Altruistic Motivation”, Mindreading and the Cognitive Architecture Underlying Altruistic Motivation 16:425–455.Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun (2002), “How Psychopaths Threaten Moral Rationalism: Is It Irrational to Be Amoral?”, How Psychopaths Threaten Moral Rationalism: Is It Irrational to Be Amoral? 85:285–304.Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun (forthcoming), “Norms with Feeling: Towards a Psychological Account of Moral Judgment”, Cognition.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1887), On the Genealogy of Morals. Translated by Kaufman, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Revelle, William, and Loftus, Debra (1992), “The Implications of Arousal Effects for the Study of Affect and Memory”, in Christianson, Sven-Åke (ed.), The Handbook of Emotion and Memory: Research and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 113–149.Google Scholar
Rozin Paul, Jonathan Haidt, and McCauley, Clark (2000), “Disgust”, in Lewis, Michael and Havilland-Jones, Jeannette M. (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 2nd edition. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael, and Wilson, Edward (1986), “Moral Philosophy as Applied Science”, Moral Philosophy as Applied Science 61:173–192.Google Scholar
Russell, John ([1460] 1969), The Boke of Nurture, in Furnivall, Frederick James (ed.), Early English Meals and Manners. London: N. Trubner, 1868. Reprinted Detroit: Singing Tree.Google Scholar
Seligman, Martin (1971), “Phobias and Preparedness”, Phobias and Preparedness 2:307–320.Google Scholar
Simner, Marvin (1971), “Newborn's Response to the Cry of Another Infant”, Newborn's Response to the Cry of Another Infant 5:136–150.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David (1998), Unto Others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan (1996), Explaining Culture. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert (1971), “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism”, The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism 46:35–57.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Colin (1972), The Mountain People. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
66
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

On the Genealogy of Norms: A Case for the Role of Emotion in Cultural Evolution
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

On the Genealogy of Norms: A Case for the Role of Emotion in Cultural Evolution
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

On the Genealogy of Norms: A Case for the Role of Emotion in Cultural Evolution
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *