Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T19:45:51.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovering Recovery: On the Relationship between Gauge Symmetry and Trautman Recovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Nicholas J. Teh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article (i) uncovers a foundational relationship between the ‘gauge symmetry’ of a Newton-Cartan theory and the celebrated Trautman Recovery Theorem and (ii) explores its implications for recent philosophical work on Newton-Cartan gravitation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 201 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†.

It is a pleasure to thank the Notre Dame Philosophy of Physics Research Group, two anonymous referees, and seminar audiences at the University of Michigan—Ann Arbor and University of Illinois at Chicago for feedback on this material. Special thanks to Karthik Prabhu for some very helpful conversations about Newton-Cartan theory.

References

Bekaert, X., and Morand, K. 2016. “Connections and Dynamical Trajectories in Generalised Newton-Cartan Gravity.” Pt. 1, “An Intrinsic View.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 57 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergshoeff, E. A., Hartong, J., and Rosseel, J. 2015. “Torsional Newton-Cartan Geometry and the Schrodinger Algebra.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 32 (13): 135017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, N. 2018. “Maxwell Gravitation.” Philosophy of Science, in this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geracie, M., Son, D. T., Wu, C., and Wu, S.-F. 2015. “Spacetime Symmetries of the Quantum Hall Effect.” Physical Review D 91:045030.Google Scholar
Knox, E. 2014. “Newtonian Spacetime Structure in Light of the Equivalence Principle.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (4): 863–80..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künzle, H. P. 1972. “Galilei and Lorentz Structures on Space-Time: Comparison of the Corresponding Geometry and Physics.” Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré Physique Théorique 17:337–62.Google Scholar
Malament, D. 2012. Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S. 2013. “Rethinking Newton’s Principia.” Philosophy of Science 80 (1): 22–48..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, D. 2016. “Fundamental and Emergent Geometry in Newtonian Physics.” PhilSci Archive. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12497/.Google Scholar
Weatherall, J. O. 2016. “Maxwell-Huygens, Newton-Cartan, and Saunders-Knox Space-Times.” Philosophy of Science 83 (1): 82–92..CrossRefGoogle Scholar