Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Elliott, Kevin C.
McCright, Aaron M.
Allen, Summer
Dietz, Thomas
and
Rosenfeld, Cheryl S.
2017.
Values in environmental research: Citizens’ views of scientists who acknowledge values.
PLOS ONE,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 10,
p.
e0186049.
Gundersen, Torbjørn
2018.
Kan eksperter være verdifrie?.
Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 5,
p.
421.
Bright, Liam Kofi
2018.
Du Bois’ democratic defence of the value free ideal.
Synthese,
Vol. 195,
Issue. 5,
p.
2227.
Parker, Wendy S.
and
Winsberg, Eric
2018.
Values and evidence: how models make a difference.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
125.
Hicks, Daniel J.
2018.
Inductive Risk and Regulatory Toxicology: A Comment on de Melo-Martín and Intemann.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 85,
Issue. 1,
p.
164.
Steel, Daniel
2018.
Wishful Thinking and Values in Science.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 85,
Issue. 5,
p.
895.
ChoGlueck, Christopher
2018.
The Error Is in the Gap: Synthesizing Accounts for Societal Values in Science.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 85,
Issue. 4,
p.
704.
Resnik, David B.
and
Elliott, Kevin C.
2019.
Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 75,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Harvard, Stephanie
Werker, Gregory R.
and
Silva, Diego S.
2020.
Social, ethical, and other value judgments in health economics modelling.
Social Science & Medicine,
Vol. 253,
Issue. ,
p.
112975.
Gundersen, Torbjørn
2020.
Value-Free yet Policy-Relevant? The Normative Views of Climate Scientists and Their Bearing on Philosophy.
Perspectives on Science,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Dede, O. Çağlar
2020.
Integrating Heather Douglas’ Inductive Risk Framework with an Account of Scientific Evidence: Why and How?.
Perspectives on Science,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 6,
p.
737.
Jebeile, Julie
and
Crucifix, Michel
2021.
Value management and model pluralism in climate science.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 88,
Issue. ,
p.
120.
Rolin, Kristina H.
2021.
Objectivity, trust and social responsibility.
Synthese,
Vol. 199,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
513.
Leefmann, Jon
2021.
How to Assess the Epistemic Wrongness of Sponsorship Bias? The Case of Manufactured Certainty.
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics,
Vol. 6,
Issue. ,
Ward, Zina B.
2021.
On value-laden science.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 85,
Issue. ,
p.
54.
Peters, Uwe
2021.
Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 4,
p.
1061.
Blessenohl, Simon
and
Sarikaya, Deniz
2022.
Science advice: making credences accurate.
Synthese,
Vol. 200,
Issue. 2,
Pamuk, Zeynep
2022.
COVID-19 and the Paradox of Scientific Advice.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
562.
Elliott, Kevin C.
2022.
Values in Science.
Cabrera, Frank
2022.
A Rawlsian Solution to the New Demarcation Problem.
Canadian Journal of Philosophy,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 8,
p.
810.