Article contents
There Are No Ahistorical Theories of Function
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Abstract
Theories of function are conventionally divided up into historical and ahistorical ones. Proponents of ahistorical theories often cite the ahistoricity of their accounts as a major virtue. Here, I argue that none of the mainstream “ahistorical” accounts are actually ahistorical. All of them refer, implicitly or explicitly, to history. In Boorse’s goal-contribution account, history is latent in the idea of statistical typicality. In the propensity theory, history is implicit in the idea of a species’ natural habitat. In the causal role theory, history is required for making sense of dysfunction. I elaborate some consequences for the functions debate.
- Type
- Biological Sciences
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association
Footnotes
I am grateful to audience members at PSA 2018, where I presented this material. I also thank Daniel Dennett, Paul Griffiths, and Fabian Hundertmark for useful feedback.
References
- 10
- Cited by