Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Yoder, 2013. Making Space for Agnosticism: A Response to Dawkins and James. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, Vol. 34, Issue. 2, p. 135.


    Cybulska, Eva M. 2008. Were Nietzsche’s Cardinal Ideas – Delusions?. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    ×

Knowledge, Belief, and Faith*

  • Anthony Kenny (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819107000010
  • Published online: 01 September 2007
Abstract
Abstract

Is belief in God reasonable? Richard Dawkins is right to say that traditional arguments for the existence of God are flawed; but so is his own disproof of the existence of God, and there are gaps in neo-Darwinian explanations of the origin of language, of life, and of the universe. The rational response is neither theism nor atheism but agnosticism. Faith in a creed is no virtue, but mere belief in God may be reasonable even if false.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0031-8191
  • EISSN: 1469-817X
  • URL: /core/journals/philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×