Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Irreducible Importance of Religious Hope in Kant's Conception of the Highest Good

  • Christopher Insole (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819108000703
  • Published online: 01 July 2008
Abstract
Abstract

Kant is clear that the concept of the ‘highest good’ involves both a demand, that we follow the moral law, as well as a promise, that happiness will be the outcome of being moral. The latter element of the highest good has troubled commentators, who tend to find it metaphysically extravagant, involving, as it does, belief in God and an afterlife. Furthermore, it seems to threaten the moral purity that Kant demands: that we obey the moral law for its own sake, not out of interest in the consequences. Those commentators brave enough to tackle the issue look to the concept of the highest good either to add content to the moral law (Silber), or to provide rational motivation, in a way that does not violate moral purity (Beiser and Wood). I argue that such interpretations, although they may be plausible reconstructions, are unable to account for certain conceptual and textual problems. By placing Kant's thought against the background of medieval theology, I argue that the hope for the summum bonum is irreducibly important for Kant, even where its function is not that of providing the content or motivational force of the moral law. Kant is not only concerned with the shape of our duties and motivations, but the shape of the universe within which these emerge.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

John Rawls , ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’, in The Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980), pp. 515–72

Andrew Reath , ‘Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (1988), pp. 593619

Thomas Pogge , ‘Kant on Ends and the Meaning of Life’ in (eds.) Andrew Reath , Barbara Herman , and Christine Korsgaard Reclaiming the History of Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 361–87

Jacqueline Marina , ‘Making Sense of Kant's Highest Good’, Kant-Studien 91 (2000), pp. 329–55

R.Z. Friedman , ‘The Importance and Function of Kant's Highest Good’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (1984), pp. 325–42.

Thomas Auxter , ‘The Unimportance of Kant's Highest Good’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (1979), pp. 121–34

Frederick Beiser , ‘Moral Faith and the Highest Good’ in (ed.) Paul Guyer , The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 588629, p. 615

Christine Korsgaard , The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) and Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0031-8191
  • EISSN: 1469-817X
  • URL: /core/journals/philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×