Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Pros and Cons of Consequentialism

  • Anne Stubbs (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2009

This paper is not another attempt to refute, or even primarily to criticize, consequentialist accounts of moral assessment; though I shall indicate the kind of criticism of such accounts which I consider to be philosophically appropriate. My primary aim is to examine the validity of some of the claims made by consequentialists themselves on behalf of their own standpoint. It is frequently maintained that an exclusively consequentialist morality uniquely possesses certain advantages; I shall argue that the case for the superiority of consequentialism has yet to be made out.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. D. Mabbott , ‘Interpretations of Mill's “Utilitarianism”’, Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1956), 115120

R. W. Beardsmore Consequences and Moral Worth’, Analysis 29 (061969)

Philip E. Devine in ‘The Conscious Acceptance of Guilt in the Necessary Murder’, Ethics 89, No. 3 (041979), 221239

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0031-8191
  • EISSN: 1469-817X
  • URL: /core/journals/philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *