Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-ghqh7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-16T08:28:29.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Different speakers, different grammars: Productivity and representation of Xhosa labial palatalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

William G. Bennett*
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Linguistics, Artillery Road, Rhodes University., Makhanda, 6140, South Africa
Aaron Braver*
Affiliation:
Department of English, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 43091, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

While cross-linguistic studies suggest that palatalization is preferentially triggered by high and front vocoids, and that it targets coronals or dorsals, Xhosa has a process of palatalization that is triggered by [w], and that targets only bilabials. This paper presents a wug test experiment, showing that some Xhosa speakers do systematically generalize this phenomenon to nonce words. This suggests that for those speakers, labial palatalization is indeed learned as part of their phonological grammar. Additionally, our findings show that some other speakers systematically do not apply palatalization in nonce words, suggesting that they have learned it as a pattern in the lexicon, and not as part of phonology. Drawing on evidence from a separate wug test experiment, we show that the inter-speaker variation in our results cannot be explained away as a task effect. As such, our results show that different speakers can have fundamentally different grammatical representations of the same sound pattern. Though Xhosa's labial palatalization pattern is phonetically unnatural, that does not indicate that it is necessarily outside the domain of phonology proper.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
Published by the Linguistic Society of America with permission of the authors under a CC BY 3.0 license.
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 William G. Bennett & Aaron Braver.

Footnotes

*

Acknowledgments are due to many people for suggestions, comments, and helpful discussion at various points in the genesis of this work. We thank Martin Krämer, Olga Urek, Seunghun Lee, Andrew Van der Spuy, Lionel Posthumus, Jochen Zeller, Andries Coetzee, John Ohala, Richard Bailey, Eva-Marie Bloom-Ström, Mark de Vos, and audiences in Tromsø, San Diego, and Potchefstroom. For help preparing stimuli and collecting data, we thank Msindisi Sam, Kelly Goldstuck, Danica Kreusch, Olona Tywabi. Supporting funding was received from the Rhodes University Research Committee, and the South African National Research Foundation. Authors’ names are in alphabetical order. An earlier working paper based on the same experiment data was published in Nordlyd in 2018.

References

Albright, Adam. 2010. Base-driven leveling in Yiddish verb paradigms. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28 (3). 475537. https://doi.org/10.1007/sll049-010-9107-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1981. Why phonology isn't “natural”. Linguistic Inquiry 12(4). 493539.Google Scholar
Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Hinskens, Frans, van Hout, Roeland & Wetzels, Leo (eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory, 3568. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumbach, Erdmann J. 1987. Analytical Tsonga grammar. Pretoria: University of South Africa, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Bateman, Nicoleta. 2007. A crosslinguistic investigation of palatalization. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego dissertation.Google Scholar
Bateman, Nicoleta. 2010. The change from labial to palatal as glide hardening. Linguistic Typology 14. 167211. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2010.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. 1993. Feature organization and the strong domain hypothesis in Zulu [labial] phonology. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 16. 126.Google Scholar
Bennett, Wm G. 2015. The phonology of consonants: Harmony, dissimilation, and correspondence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139683586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe N.S. 1978. A general study of palatalization. In Ferguson, Charles, Greenberg, Joseph H. & Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.), Universais of human language, Vol. 2: Phonology, 4792. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1997. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 21. 4358.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce. 2001. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 4586. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901554586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Pater, Joe. 2016. Convergence properties of a gradual learning algorithm for Harmonic Grammar. In McCarthy, John & Pater, Joe (eds.), Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism, 389434. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cantrell, John V. 1946. Some aspects of Mpondo and its relation to Xhosa and Zulu. University of South Africa (UNISA) dissertation.Google Scholar
Chen, Su-I & ambe, Gloria Mal. 1998. Palatalization in Siswati: An Optimality Theoretic approach. In Maddieson, Ian & Hinnebusch, Thomas J. (eds.), Language history and linguistic description in Africa, 137146. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Claughton, John Sellick. 1992. The Tonology of Xhosa. Grahamstown, ZA: Rhodes University dissertation, http://hdl.handle.net/10962/dl002171.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pretorius, Rigardt. 2010. Phonetically grounded phonology and sound change: The case of Tswana labial plosives. Journal of Phonetics 38. 404421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Desmond T. 1955. An introduction to Tswana grammar. Cape Town: Longman.Google Scholar
Cook, Toni. 2013. Morphological and phonological structure in Zulu reduplication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer, Smolensky, Paul & Wilson, Colin. 2013. Cognitive biases, linguistic universais, and constraint-based grammar learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (3). 392424. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 2009. Phonological evidence. In Parker, Steve (ed.), Phonological argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation, 4378. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publications.Google Scholar
Doke, Clement M. 1923. A dissertation on the phonetics of the Zulu language. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies 2(4). 685729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doke, Clement M. 1954. The Southern Bantu languages. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J. 2001. Liquid spirantization in Jita. Maililime: Malawian Journal of Linguistics 2. 127.Google Scholar
Eiselen, Roald & Puttkammer, Martin. 2014. Developing text resources for ten South African languages. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. 36983703.Google Scholar
Gorecka, Alicja. 1989. The phonology of articulation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Google Scholar
Goldwater, Sharon & Johnson, Mark. 2003. Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model. Proceedings of the Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory. 111120.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria, Zsiga, Elizabeth & Tlale Boyer, One. 2011. Grounded constraints and the consonants of Setswana. Lingua 121 (15). 21202152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías. 2017. Analogy in formal grammar. Leipzig: University of Leipzig dissertation, http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003689.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 2000. Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory. In Dekkers, Joost, Reinoud, Frank van, Hugo Leeuw, der, van de Weijer, Jeroen Maarten (eds.), Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisti on, 88120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Siptár, Pérter, Zuraw, Kie & Londe, Zsuzsa. 2009. Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language 85 (4). 822863. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & White, James. 2015. Saltation and the P-map. Phonology 32 (2). 136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675715000159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Wilson, Colin. 2008. A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry 39 (3). 379440. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.3.379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. 1977. Morphophonological palatalization in southern Bantu: A reply to segmental fusion. Studies in African Linguistics 8(2). 4163.Google Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. 1990. Labial palatalization in Sotho and Nguni languages: Internal and external evidence. South African Journal of African Languages 10. 7480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.1990.10586836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2003. Sound change, misanalysis, and analogy in the Bantu causative. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 24. 5590. https://doi.org/10.1515/jall.2003.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessen, Michael & Roux, Justus. 2002. Voice quality differences associated with stops and clicks in Xhosa. Journal of Phonetics 30 (1). 152. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2008. Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17 (4). 317330. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0831-008-9030-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khumalo, Khumalo James Steven. 1987. An autosegmental account of Zulu phonology. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand dissertation.Google Scholar
Khumalo, Khumalo James Steven. 1988. Palatalization in Zulu. In Nkabinde, A. C. (ed.), Anthology of Articles on African Linguistics and Literature: A Festschrift to C. L. S. Nyemhezi, 7199. Johannesburg: Lexicon Publishers.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei. 2011. Palatalisation. In Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth, van Oostendorp, Marc & Rice, Keren (eds.), Companion to phonology, 16661690. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei & Alderete, John. 2011. Patterns and scales of expressive palatalization: Experimental evidence from Japanese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 56(3). 345376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1995. The nature of the so-called analogical processes. (Translated into English and with an introduction by Margaret E. Winters). Diachronica 12(1). 113145.Google Scholar
Lee, Seunghun & Burheni, Clementinah. 2014. Repair strategies in labial dissimilation: Diminutive formations in Xitsonga. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 44 (1). 89103. https://doi.org/10.5842/44-0-642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louw, Jacobus A. 1975/76. Palatalization of bilabials in the passive, diminutive and locative in Xhosa and Tsonga. Afrika und Übersee 49(4). 241278.Google Scholar
Malambe, Gloria Baby. 2006. Palatalization and other non-local effects in Southern Bantu languages. London: University College London dissertation.Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold. 1980. Laws of analogy. Historical Morphology 17. 283288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, James. 1942. A Xhosa grammar. Cape Town: Longman, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Moore-Cantwell, Claire. 2016. The representation of probabilistic phonological patterns: Neurological, behavioral, and computational evidence from the English stress system. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott. 2008. Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25 (1). 83127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675708001413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi & Reynolds, Bill. 1997. Optimality Theory and variable word-final deletion in Faetar. Languge Variation and Change 9. 3755. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidoo, Shamila. 2002. The palatalisation process in isiZulu revisited. South African Journal of African Languages 1. 5969. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2002.10587498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemakhavhani, Daniel Phuluwani. 2002. Palatalization and labialization in Tshivenda: A linear and non-linear phonological analysis. Cape Town: Stellenbosch University Master's thesis.Google Scholar
Nyamende, Abner. 1994. Regional variation in Xhosa. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 26. 202217. https://doi.org/10.5842/26-0-129.Google Scholar
O’Bryan, Margie. 1974. The role of analogy in non-derived formations in Zulu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 4(1). 144178.Google Scholar
Ohala, John & Lorentz, James. 1977. The story of [w]: An exercise in the phonetic explanation for sound patterns. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 3. 577599. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v3i0.2264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. 1978. Southern Bantu vs. the world: The case of palatalization of labials. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 4. 370386. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, Carrie S., Hendrick, Roberta A. & Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), 178203. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1990. There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: A personal view. Journal of Phonetics 18. 153171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30399-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podile, Kholisa. 2002. The dependency relations within Xhosa phonological processes. Johannesburg, ZA: University of South Africa Master's thesis.Google Scholar
Poulos, George & Msimang, Christian T.. 1998. A linguistic analysis of Zulu. Cape Town: Via Afrika.Google Scholar
Reiss, Charles. 2017. Substance free phonology. In Hannahs, Stephen & Bosch, Anna (eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonological theory, 435452. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sibanda, Galen. 2004. Verbal phonology and morphology of Ndebele. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Stahlke, Herbert F. W. 1976. Segment sequences and segmental fusion. Studies in African Linguistics 7. 4163.Google Scholar
Spiegler, Sebastian, Van, Andrew Spuy, Der & Flach, Peter A.. 2010. Ukwabelana: An open-source morphological Zulu corpus. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 10201028. https://github.com/LowResourceLanguages/bristol-mt-morphology.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Ms., Los Angeles, CA: University of California. http://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/steriade/papers/PhoneticsInPhonology.pdf.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Hanson, Kristin, Inkelas, Sharon & Kager, René (eds.), The nature of the word: Studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky, 151180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7894.003.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tshabe, Sonobo L., et al. 2006. The Greater Dictionary of IsiXhosa. Volumes 1-3, previously published in 1989, 2003. Alice, ZA: University of Fort Hare.Google Scholar
Van der Spuy, Andrew. 2014. Bilabial palatalisation in Zulu: A morphologically conditioned phenomenon. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 44. 7187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Karl Heinz. 1969. ‘Analogical change’ reconsidered in the framework of generative phonology. Folia Linguistica 3(3-4). 228241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, James. 2013. Bias in phonological learning: Evidence from saltation. Los Angeles: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
White, James. 2017. Accounting for the learnability of saltation in phonological theory: A maximum entropy model with a P-map bias. Language 93 (1). 136. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Colin. 2003. Experimental investigation of phonological naturalness. Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. 101114.Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin. 2006. Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30 (5). 945982. https://doi.org/10.1207/sl5516709cog0000_89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zsiga, Elizabeth and Gouskova, Maria. 2006. On the status of voiced obstruents in Tswana: Against *ND. Proceedings of NELS 36. 721734.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie. 2007. The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: Corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog. Language 83 (2). 277316. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar