Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-bz9xj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-18T01:55:06.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya and Mariko Sugahara (eds.) (2012). Prosody matters: essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk. (Advances in Optimality Theory.) Sheffield & Bristol, Conn.: Equinox. Pp. xv+528

Review products

Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya and Mariko Sugahara (eds.) (2012). Prosody matters: essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk. (Advances in Optimality Theory.) Sheffield & Bristol, Conn.: Equinox. Pp. xv+528

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

Sónia Frota  and
Marina Vigário
Sónia Frota
Affiliation:
University of Lisbon
Marina Vigário
Affiliation:
University of Lisbon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , May 2013 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Booij, Geert (1996). Cliticization as prosodic integration: the case of Dutch. The Linguistic Review 13. 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, François & Elmedlaoui, Mohamed (1985). Syllabic consonants and syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7. 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, Sónia (2000). Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: phonological phrasing and intonation. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia (2002). Nuclear falls and rises in European Portuguese: a phonological analysis of declarative and question intonation. Probus 14. 113–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, Sónia (2012). Prosodic structure, constituents and their implementation. In Cohn, Abigail C., Fougeron, Cécile & Huffman, Marie K. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 255–265.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria (2010). The phonology of boundaries and secondary stress in Russian compounds. The Linguistic Review 27. 387–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos (1983). Focus, mode and the nucleus. JL 19. 377–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan (1999). Phonotactics and the prosodic structure of German function words. In Hall, T. Alan & Kleinhenz, Ursula (eds.) Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2009). The extended prosodic word. In Grijzenhout, Janet & Kabak, Barış (eds.) Phonological domains: universals and deviations. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 135–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. & Shaw, Patricia A. (1985). On the theory of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelica & Selkirk, Elisabeth (2007). Phase theory and prosodic spellout: the case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24. 93–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2008). Intonational phonology. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. (2nd edn, 2007. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.)Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon (1997). Prosodic words. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid (2008). Syllables without vowels: phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber. Phonology 25. 321–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1980). Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In Aronoff, Mark & Kean, Mary-Louise (eds.) Juncture. Saratoga: Anma Libri. 107–129.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In Morgan, James L. & Demuth, Katherine (eds.) Signal to syntax: bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 187–213.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (2005). Comments on intonational phrasing in English. In Frota, Sónia, Vigário, Marina & João Freitas, Maria (eds.) Prosodies: with special reference to Iberian languages. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 11–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert (1995). Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert (2007). Upstep on edge tones and on nuclear accents. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Riad, Tomas (eds.) Tones and tunes. Vol. 2: Experimental studies in word and sentence prosody. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 349–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, Mieko & Kluender, Robert (2003). On the processing of Japanese wh-questions: relating grammar and brain. WCCFL 22. 491–504.Google Scholar
Vigário, Marina (2003). The prosodic word in European Portuguese. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigário, Marina (2010). Prosodic structure between the prosodic word and the phonological phrase: recursive nodes or an independent domain? The Linguistic Review 27. 485–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar