Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Articulatory gestures as phonological units*

  • Catherine P. Browman (a1) and Louis Goldstein (a2)
Abstract

We have argued that dynamically defined articulatory gestures are the appropriate units to serve as the atoms of phonological representation. Gestures are a natural unit, not only because they involve task-oriented movements of the articulators, but because they arguably emerge as prelinguistic discrete units of action in infants. The use of gestures, rather than constellations of gestures as in Root nodes, as basic units of description makes it possible to characterise a variety of language patterns in which gestural organisation varies. Such patterns range from the misorderings of disordered speech through phonological rules involving gestural overlap and deletion to historical changes in which the overlap of gestures provides a crucial explanatory element.

Gestures can participate in language patterns involving overlap because they are spatiotemporal in nature and therefore have internal duration. In addition, gestures differ from current theories of feature geometry by including the constriction degree as an inherent part of the gesture. Since the gestural constrictions occur in the vocal tract, which can be charactensed in terms of tube geometry, all the levels of the vocal tract will be constricted, leading to a constriction degree hierarchy. The values of the constriction degree at each higher level node in the hierarchy can be predicted on the basis of the percolation principles and tube geometry. In this way, the use of gestures as atoms can be reconciled with the use of Constriction degree at various levels in the vocal tract (or feature geometry) hierarchy.

The phonological notation developed for the gestural approach might usefully be incorporated, in whole or in part, into other phonologies. Five components of the notation were discussed, all derived from the basic premise that gestures are the primitive phonological unit, organised into gestural scores. These components include (1) constriction degree as a subordinate of the articulator node and (2) stiffness (duration) as a subordinate of the articulator node. That is, both CD and duration are inherent to the gesture. The gestures are arranged in gestural scores using (3) articulatory tiers, with (4) the relevant geometry (articulatory, tube or feature) indicated to the left of the score and (5) structural information above the score, if desired. Association lines can also be used to indicate how the gestures are combined into phonological units. Thus, gestures can serve both as characterisations of articulatory movement data and as the atoms of phonological representation.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. Abry & Böe L.-J. (1986). ‘Laws’ for lips. Speech Communication 5. 97104.

F. Bell-Berti & K. S. Harris (1981). A temporal model of speech production. Phonetica 38. 920.

C. T. Best & D. Wilkenfeld (1988). Phonologically-motivated substitutions in a 20–22 month old's imitations of intervocalic alveolar stops. JASA 84. S114.

C. P. Browman & L. Goldstein (1988). Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology. Phonetica 45. 140155.

C. P. Browman , L. Goldstein , J. A. S. Kelso , P. Rubin & E. Saltzman (1984). Articulatory synthesis from underlying dynamics. JASA 75. S22–S23.

C. P. Browman , L. Goldstein , E. Saltzman & C. Smith (1986). GEST: a computational model for speech production using dynamically defined articulatory gestures. JASA 80. S97.

G. N. Clements (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225252.

C. A. Fowler (1981). A relationship between coarticulation and compensatory shortening. Phonetica 38. 3550.

C. A. Fowler (1983). Converging sources of evidence on spoken and perceived rhythms of speech: cyclic production of vowels in sequences of monosyllable stress feet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112. 386412.

O. Fujimura (1981 a). Temporal organization of articulatory movements as a multidimensional phrasal structure. Phonetica 38. 6683.

H. Haken , J. A. S. Kelso & H. Bunz (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics 51. 347356.

W. J. Hardcastle & P. J. Roach (1979). An instrumental investigation of coarticulation in stop consonant sequences. In P. Hollien & H. Hollien (eds.) Current issues in the phonetic sciences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 531540.

J. A. S. Kelso , E. Vatikiotis-Bateson , E. L. Saltzman & B. Kay (1985). A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling. JASA 77. 266280.

R. D. Kent & A. D. Murray (1982). Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6, and 9 months. JASA 72. 353365.

K. Kohler (1976). Die Instabilität wortfinaler Alveolarplosive im Deutschen: eine elektropalatographische Untersuchung. Phonetica 33. 130.

R. Lass (1984). Phonology: an introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A. M. Liberman & I. G. Mattingly (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21. 136.

B. Lindblom & R. Zetterström (eds.) (1986). Precursors of early speech. Basingstoke: MacMillan.

J. J. McCarthy (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 45. 84108.

P. F. MacNeilage (ed.) (1983). The production of speech. New York: Springer.

R. C. Marshall , J. Gandour & J. Windsor (1988). Selective impairment of phonation: a case study. Brain and Language 35. 313339.

S. Nittrouer , M. Studdert-Kennedy & R. S. McGowan (1989). The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32. 120132.

S. Nittrouer , K. Munhall , J. A. S. Kelso , B. Tuller & K. S. Harris (1988). Patterns of interarticulator phasing and their relation to linguistic structure. JASA 84. 16531661.

J. J. Ohala & J. Lorentz (1977). The story of [w]: an exercise in the phonetic explanation for sound patterns. BLS 3. 577599.

D. K. Oiler & R. E. Eiiers (1988). The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Development 59. 441449.

D. J. Ostry & K. Munhall (1985). Control of rate and duration of speech movements. JASA 77. 640648.

K. L. Pike (1943). Phonetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

V. Y. Plotkin (1976). Systems of ultimate units. Phonetica 33. 8192.

P. Rubin , T. Baer & P. Mermelstein (1981). An articulatory synthesizer for perceptual research. JASA 70. 321328.

E. Saltzman (1986). Task dynamic coordination of the speech articulators: a preliminary model. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (eds.) Generation and modulation of actionpatterns. New York: Springer. 129144.

E. Saltzman & J. A. S. Kelso (1987). Skilled actions: a task dynamic approach. Psychological Review 94. 84106.

E. Saltzman , P. E. Rubin , L. Goldstein & C. P. Browman (1987). Task-dynamic modeling of interarticulator coordination. JASA 82. S15.

T. C. Schadeberg (1982). Nasalization in UMbundu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 4. 109132.

E. Thelen (1981). Rhythmical behavior in infancy: an ethological perspective. Developmental Psychology 17. 237257.

T. Vennemann & P. Ladefoged (1973). Phonetic features and phonological features. Lingua 32. 6174.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 27 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 323 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.