Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-s8fcc Total loading time: 0.277 Render date: 2022-12-04T05:34:40.200Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English
Political Analysis Political Analysis

Article contents

Attitudes, No Opinions, and Guesses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

John E. Jackson
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a statistical model of the survey response that includes both a measure of the respondent's likely true attitude and a measure of the probability that the respondent is uncertain about her or his attitude and is “guessing” at a response. This latter possibility introduces systematic measurement error that may bias efforts to get unbiased estimates of attitudes. The model and the likely consequences of guessing are illustrated with questions about Vietnam policy taken from the 1968, 1970, and 1972 National Election Studies (NES) surveys. The article ends with a discussion of the limitations and fragility of the model.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 5 , 1993 , pp. 39 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, Michael, and Franklin, Charles H. 1994a. “Uncertainty and Political Perceptions.” Journal of Politics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Michael, and Franklin, Charles H. 1994b. “Attitudes, Uncertainty and Survey Responses.” Cal Tech Working Paper. Pasadena, Calif.: California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Amemiya, Takeshi. 1985. Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1986. “Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test.” American Journal of Political Science 30:709–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1988a. The Dynamics of Presidential Primaries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1988b. “Alternative Misspecifications in Simultaneous Equation Models.” Political Methodology II, nos. 3–4 (1985; published Winter 1988): 181–99.Google Scholar
Bishop, George F., Tuchfarber, Alfred J., and Oldendick, Robert W. 1978. “Change in the Structure of American Political Attitudes: The Nagging Question of Question Wording.” American Journal of Political Science 22:250–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E. 1993. “Guessing, Stability, Reliability in Attitude Items: Why WileyWiley Models Do Not Tell You Enough.” Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Ill., April 9, 1993.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In David, E. Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent, 206–61. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., 1970. “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In Tufte, Edward R., ed., The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, 168–89. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Jackson, John E. 1985. “Structural Estimation with Limited Variables.” In Weisberg, H., ed., Political Science: The Science of Politics, 20124. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., and Jackson, John E. 1993. “Endogenous Preferences and the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 87:655–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1979. “Statistical Estimation of Possible Response Bias in CloseEnded Issue Questions.” Political Methodology 6:393–423.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuman, Howard, and Presser, Stanley. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E., and Marcus, George E. 1978. “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings.” American Journal of Political Science 22:233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John, and Feldman, Stanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions vs. Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36:579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Attitudes, No Opinions, and Guesses
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Attitudes, No Opinions, and Guesses
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Attitudes, No Opinions, and Guesses
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *