Skip to main content
×
×
Home

An Empirical Bayes Approach to Estimating Ordinal Treatment Effects

  • R. Michael Alvarez (a1), Delia Bailey (a2) and Jonathan N. Katz (a1)
Abstract

Ordinal variables—categorical variables with a defined order to the categories, but without equal spacing between them—are frequently used in social science applications. Although a good deal of research exists on the proper modeling of ordinal response variables, there is not a clear directive as to how to model ordinal treatment variables. The usual approaches found in the literature for using ordinal treatment variables are either to use fully unconstrained, though additive, ordinal group indicators or to use a numeric predictor constrained to be continuous. Generalized additive models are a useful exception to these assumptions. In contrast to the generalized additive modeling approach, we propose the use of a Bayesian shrinkage estimator to model ordinal treatment variables. The estimator we discuss in this paper allows the model to contain both individual group—level indicators and a continuous predictor. In contrast to traditionally used shrinkage models that pull the data toward a common mean, we use a linear model as the basis. Thus, each individual effect can be arbitrary, but the model “shrinks” the estimates toward a linear ordinal framework according to the data. We demonstrate the estimator on two political science examples: the impact of voter identification requirements on turnout and the impact of the frequency of religious service attendance on the liberality of abortion attitudes.

Copyright
Corresponding author
e-mail: rma@hss.caltech.edu (corresponding author)
Footnotes
Hide All

Authors' note: The views expressed here are those of the authors, not of any organizations they are currently or formerly associated with.

Editors' note: This article was accepted by the previous editorial team in consultation with the officers of the Society for Political Methodology. Unforeseen delays resulted in it appearing in an issue edited by two of the authors. These two authors played no editorial role for this article.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Agresti, Alan. 1990. Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Aitchison, J., and Silvey, S. D. 1957. The generalization of probit analysis to the case of multiple responses. Biometrika 44: 131–40.
Aldrich, J., and Cnudde, C. F. 1975. Probing the bounds of conventional wisdom: A comparison of regression, probit, and discriminant analysis. American Journal of Political Science 19: 571608.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Bailey, Delia, and Katz, Jonathan N. 2007. The effect of voter identification laws on turnout. Unpublished Manuscript, California Institute of Technology and Washington University in St. Louis.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Sinclair, Betsy. 2008. Katrina's voters: Floods, representation, and social context Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Bryant, Lisa A., Hall, Thad E., Saunders, Kyle L., and Michael Alvarez, R. 2007. New barriers to participation: Application of New Mexico's voter identification law. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Barreto, Matt A., Nuno, Stephen A., and Sanchez, Gabriel R. 2007. Voter ID requirements and the disenfranchisement of Latino, Black and Asian voters. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Bates, Douglas. 2007. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package version 0.99875-9.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jackman, Simon. 1998. Beyond linearity by default: Generalized additive models. American Journal of Political Science 42: 596627.
Combs, Michael W., and Welch, Susan. 1982. Blacks, white, and attitudes toward abortion. Public Opinion Quarterly 46: 510–20.
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Bradford S., and Westerland, Chad. 2006. Order matters(?): Alternatives to conventional practices for ordinal categorical variables. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.
Kedar, Orit, and Phillips Shively, W. 2005. Introduction to the special issue. Political Analysis 13: 297300.
Lott, John R. 2006. Evidence of Voter Fraud and the Impact that Regulations to Reduce Fraud Have on Voter Participation Rates. http://ssrn.com/abstract=925611.
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKelvey, R. D., and Zavonia, W. 1975. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4: 103–20.
Miller, Warren E. 1991. Party identification, realignment, and party voting: Back to the basics. American Political Science Review 85: 557–68.
Mycoff, Jason D., Wagner, Michael, and Wilson, David. 2007. The effect of voter identification laws on turnout. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Nagler, Jonathan. 1991. The effect of voter registration laws and education on U.S. voter turnout. American Political Science Review 85: 1393–405.
NORC. 2004. General Social Survey. http://www.norc.org/projects/General+Social+Survey.htm.
R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, version 26.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statisical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.
Raudenbush, Stephen W., and Bryk, Anthony S. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rosenstone, S. J., and Wolfinger, R. E. 1978. The effect of registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review 72: 2245.
Singh, B. Kirshna, and Leahy, Peter J. 1978. Contextual and ideological dimensions of attitudes toward discretionary abortion. Demography 15: 381–88.
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S. 2002. Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science 46: 218–37.
Tedrow, Lucky M., and Mahoney, E. R. 1979. Trends in attitudes toward abortion: 1972-1976. Public Opinion Quarterly 43: 181–89.
Vercellotti, Timothy, and Anderson, David. 2006. Protecting the franchise, or restricting it? The effects of voter identification requirements on turnout. Unpublished Manuscript, Rutgers University.
Western, Bruce. 1998. Causal heterogeneity in comparative research: A Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach. American Journal of Political Science 42: 1233–59.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed