Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparing Partial Likelihood and Robust Estimation Methods for the Cox Regression Model

  • Bruce A. Desmarais (a1) and Jeffrey J. Harden (a2)

Abstract

The Cox proportional hazards model is ubiquitous in time-to-event studies of political processes. Plausible deviations from correct specification and operationalization caused by problems such as measurement error or omitted variables can produce substantial bias when the Cox model is estimated by conventional partial likelihood maximization (PLM). One alternative is an iteratively reweighted robust (IRR) estimator, which can reduce this bias. However, the utility of IRR is limited by the fact that there is currently no method for determining whether PLM or IRR is more appropriate for a particular sample of data. Here, we develop and evaluate a novel test for selecting between the two estimators. Then, we apply the test to political science data. We demonstrate that PLM and IRR can each be optimal, that our test is effective in choosing between them, and that substantive conclusions can depend on which one is used.

Copyright

Corresponding author

e-mail: jjharden@unc.edu (corresponding author)

Footnotes

Hide All

Edited by Jonathan N. Katz

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Arjas, Elja. 1988. A graphical method for assessing goodness of fit in Cox's proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83(401): 204–12.
Bednarski, Tadeusz. 1989. On sensitivity of Cox's estimator. Statistics and Decisions 7(3): 215–28.
Bednarski, Tadeusz. 1993. Robust estimation in Cox's regression model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 20(3): 213–25.
Bednarski, Tadeusz, and Borowicz, Filip. 2006. coxrobust: Robust Estimation in Cox Model, R package version 1.0.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S. 1997. Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science 41(4): 1414–61.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S. 2004. Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Zorn, Christopher J. W. 2001. Duration models and proportional hazards in political science. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 972–88.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Zorn, Christopher. 2002. Duration models for repeated events. Journal of Politics 64(4): 1069–94.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Arnold, Laura W., and Zorn, Christopher J. W. 1997. The strategic timing of position taking in congress: A study of the North American Free Trade Agreement. American Political Science Review 91(2): 324–38.
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1): 6382.
Cai, Jianwen, Sen, Pranab K., and Zhou, Haibo. 1999. A random effects model for multivariate failure time data from multicenter clinical trials. Biometrics 55(1): 182–89.
Clarke, Kevin A. 2003. Nonparametric model discrimination in international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(1): 7293.
Clarke, Kevin A. 2007. A simple distribution-free test for nonnested hypotheses. Political Analysis 15(3): 347–63.
Cook, R. Dennis. 1977. Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics 19(1): 15–8.
Cox, David R. 1972. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 34(2): 187220.
Cox, David R. 1975. Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62(2): 269–76.
Desmarais, Bruce A., and Harden, Jeffrey J. 2011. Replication data for: Comparing partial likelihood and robust estimation methods for the Cox regression model. IQSS Dataverse Network [Distributor]. Vol. 1. http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/16638.
Diermeier, Daniel, and van Roozendaal, Peter. 1998. The duration of cabinet formation processes in western multi-party democracies. British Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 609–26.
Genz, Alan, Bretz, Frank, Hothorn, Torsten, Miwa, Tetsuhisa, Mi, Xuefei, Leisch, Friedrich, and Scheipl, Fabian. 2008. mvtnorm: Multivariate Normal and t Distributions, R package version 0.9-3.
Golder, Sona N. 2010. Bargaining delays in the government formation process. Comparative Political Studies 43(1): 332.
Harden, Jeffrey J., and Desmarais, Bruce A. 2011. Linear models with outliers: Choosing between conditional-mean and conditional-median methods. State Politics & Policy Quarterly doi:10.1177/1532440011408929.
Hartzell, Caroline, and Hoddie, Matthew. 2003. Institutionalizing peace: Power sharing and post-civil war conflict management. American Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 318–32.
Laver, Michael, and Ben Hunt, W. 1992. Policy and party competition. New York: Routledge.
Longini, Ira M., and Elizabeth Halloran, M. 1996. A frailty mixture model for estimating vaccine efficacy. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) 45(2): 165–73.
Martin, Lanny W. 2004. The government agenda in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 445–61.
Martin, Lanny W., and Vanberg, Georg. 2003. Wasting time? The impact of ideology and size on delay in coalition formation. British Journal of Political Science 33(2): 323–44.
Mattes, Michaela, and Savun, Burcu. 2010. Information, agreement design, and the durability of civil war settlements. American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 511–24.
Minder, Christopher E., and Bednarski, Tadeusz. 1996. A robust method for proportional hazards regression. Statistics in Medicine 15(10): 1033–47.
R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reid, Nancy, and Crépeau, Helene. 1985. Influence functions for proportional hazards regression. Biometrika 72(1): 19.
Therneau, Terry, and Lumley, Thomas. 2009. survival: Survival analysis, including penalised likelihood, R package version 2.35-4.
Verweij, Pierre J.M., and Van Houwelingen, Hans C. 1993. Cross-validation in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 12(24): 2305–14.
Yu, Chi Wai, and Clarke, Bertrand. 2011. Median loss decision theory. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141(2): 611–23.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Desmarais and Harden supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (670 KB)
670 KB

Comparing Partial Likelihood and Robust Estimation Methods for the Cox Regression Model

  • Bruce A. Desmarais (a1) and Jeffrey J. Harden (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.