Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks

  • James H. Fowler (a1)
Abstract

Using large-scale network analysis I map the cosponsorship networks of all 280,000 pieces of legislation proposed in the U.S. House and Senate from 1973 to 2004. In these networks, a directional link can be drawn from each cosponsor of a piece of legislation to its sponsor. I use a number of statistics to describe these networks such as the quantity of legislation sponsored and cosponsored by each legislator, the number of legislators cosponsoring each piece of legislation, the total number of legislators who have cosponsored bills written by a given legislator, and network measures of closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector centrality. I then introduce a new measure I call “connectedness” which uses information about the frequency of cosponsorship and the number of cosponsors on each bill to make inferences about the social distance between legislators. Connectedness predicts which members will pass more amendments on the floor, a measure that is commonly used as a proxy for legislative influence. It also predicts roll call vote choice even after controlling for ideology and partisanship.

Copyright
Corresponding author
e-mail: jhfowler@ucdavis.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. A.Beck , R. J.Dalton , S.Greene , and R.Huckfeldt 2002. The social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. American Political Science Review 96(1): 5773.

P.Bonacich 1972. Factoring and weighing approaches to clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2: 113–20.

Gregory A.Caldeira , John A.Clark , and Samuel C.Patterson 1993. Political respect in the legislature. Legislative Studies Quarterly 18(3): 328.

James E.Campbell 1982. Cosponsoring legislation in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 7(3): 415–22.

H.Ebel , L.-I.Mielsch , and S.Bornholdt 2002. Scale-free topology of e-mail networks. Physical Review E 66(035103).

KatherineFaust , and JohnSkvoretz . 2002. Comparing networks across space and time, size and species. Sociological Methodology 32: 267–99.

L. C.Freeman , S. P.Borgatti , and D. R.White 1991. Centrality in valued graphs—A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks 13(2): 141–54.

J.Galaskiewicz , and P. V.Marsden 1978. Interorganizational resource networks: Formal patterns of overlap. Social Science Research 7: 89107.

Richard L.Hall 1992. Measuring legislative influence. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(2): 205–31.

B.Highton 2000. Residential mobility, community mobility, and electoral participation. Political Behavior 22(2): 109–20.

R.Huckfeldt , P. A.Beck , R. J.Dalton , and J.Levine 1995. Political environments, cohesive social-groups, and the communication of public-opinion. American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 1025–54.

DanielKessler , and KeihKrehbiel . 1996. Dynamics of cosponsorship. The American Political Science Review 90(3): 555–66.

KeithKrehbiel . 1995. Cosponsors and wafflers from A to Z. The American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 906–23.

J.Moody 2001. Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. American Journal of Sociology 107: 679716.

Mark E. J.Newman 2001a. Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E 64(016131).

Mark E. J.Newman 2001b. Scientific collaboration networks: II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E 64(016132).

William H.Panning 1982. Blockmodels: From relations to configurations. American Journal of Political Science 26(3): 585608.

P. A.Pellegrini , and J. T.Grant 1999. Policy coalitions in the US Congress: A spatial duration modeling approach. Geographical Analysis 31(1): 4566.

K. T.Poole , and H.Rosenthal 1985. A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29(2): 357–84.

K. T.Poole , and H.Rosenthal 1991. Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science 35(1): 228–78.

Mason A.Porter , Peter J.Mucha , M. E. J.Newman , and Casey M.Warmbrand 2005. A network analysis of committees in the U.S. House of Representatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 7057–62.

Stuart A.Rice 1927. The identification of blocs in small political bodies. American Political Science Review 21(3): 619–27.

R. B.Rothenberg , J. J.Potterat , and D. E.Woodhouse 1995. Choosing a centrality measure—Epidemiologic correlates in the Colorado-Springs study of social networks. Social Networks 17 (3-4): 273–97.

G.Sabidussi 1966. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31: 581603.

Wendy J.Schiller 1995. Senators and political entrepreneurs: Using bill sponsorship to shape legislative agendas. The American Journal of Political Science 39(1): 186203.

B. C.Straits 1990. The social-context of voter turnout. Public Opinion Quarterly 54(1): 6473.

J. C.Talbert , and M.Potoski 2002. Setting the legislative agenda: The dimensional structure of bill cosponsoring and floor voting. Journal of Politics 64(3): 864–91.

Rick K.Wilson , and Cheryl D.Young 1997. Cosponsorship in the United States Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(1): 2443.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Fowler supplementary material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (6.8 MB)
6.8 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score