Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Pass the Pork: Measuring Legislator Shares in Congress

  • Benjamin E. Lauderdale (a1)
Abstract

Linear regression models are frequently used to analyze distributive politics in the U.S. Congress; however, authors have used a variety of specifications with different implicit assumptions about how bicameralism shapes legislative bargaining. I derive a model that describes district or state spending authorizations as the aggregation of spending secured by multiple legislators working on behalf of overlapping constituencies. This bicameral shares model allows the disaggregation of House and Senate influence through simultaneous estimation of the relative bargaining power of the two chambers and the advantages that accrue to legislators holding partisan, committee, and other relevant affiliations. In the 2005 transportation bill, the model better predicts the functional form of small state advantage than recently employed specifications in the literature.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Achen, Christopher H., and Phillips Shively, W. 1995. Cross-level inference. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Balla, Steven J., Lawrence, Eric D., Maltzman, Forrest, and Sigelman, Lee. 2002. Partisanship, blame avoidance, and the distribution of legislative pork. American Journal of Political Science 46: 515–25.
Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John F. 1987. Bargaining and agenda formation in legislatures. The American Economic Review 77: 303–9.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Myerson, Roger B. 1999. Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal organization of legislatures. The American Economic Review 89: 1182–96.
Evans, Diana. 2004. Greasing the wheels: Using pork barrel projects to build majority coalitions in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hauk, William R., and Wacziarg, Romain. 2007. Small states, big pork. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2: 95106.
Knight, Brian G. 2004. Parochial interests and the centralized provision of local public goods: Evidence from congressional voting on transportation projects. Journal of Public Economics 88: 845–66.
Larcinese, Valentino, Rizzo, Leonzio, and Testa, Cecilia. 2006. Allocating the US federal budget to the states: The impact of the president. Journal of Politics 68: 447.
Lee, Frances E. 2000. Senate representation and coalition building in distributional politics. American Political Science Review 94: 5972.
Lee, Frances E. 2003. Geographic politics in the U.S. house of representatives: Coalition building and distribution of benefits. American Journal of Political Science. 47: 714–28.
Lee, Frances E., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1999. Sizing up the Senate: The unequal consequences of equal representation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McCarty, Nolan. 2000. Proposal rights, veto rights, and political bargaining. American Journal of Political Science 44: 506–22.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax