Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:11:42.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Elections and the Stock Market: Comparing Markov-Switching and Fractionally Integrated GARCH Models of Volatility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

David Leblang  and
Bumba Mukherjee
David Leblang
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Colorado, 106 Ketchum Hall, Boulder, CO 80309. e-mail: leblang@colorado.edu
Bumba Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Florida State University, 554 Bellamy Building, Tallahassee, FL 32306. e-mail: smukherj@mailer.fsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Existing research on electoral politics and financial markets predicts that when investors expect left parties—Democrats (US), Labor (UK)—to win elections, market volatility increases. In addition, current econometric research on stock market volatility suggests that Markov-switching models provide more accurate volatility forecasts and fit stock price volatility data better than linear or nonlinear GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity) models. Contrary to the existing literature, we argue here that when traders anticipate that the Democratic candidate will win the presidential election, stock market volatility decreases. Using two data sets from the 2000 U.S. presidential election, we test our claim by estimating several GARCH, exponential GARCH (EGARCH), fractionally integrated exponential GARCH (FIEGARCH), and Markov-switching models. We also conduct extensive forecasting tests—including RMSE and MAE statistics as well as realized volatility regressions—to evaluate these competing statistical models. Results from forecasting tests show, in contrast to prevailing claims, that GARCH and EGARCH models provide substantially more accurate forecasts than the Markov-switching models. Estimates from all the statistical models support our key prediction that stock market volatility decreases when traders anticipate a Democratic victory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Summer 2004 , pp. 296 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Political Methodology 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Roubini, Nouriel, and Cohen, Gerald D. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baillie, Richard T., Bollerslev, Tim, and Mikkelsen, Hans O. 1996. “Fractionally Integrated Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics 74: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1991. “Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval.” Political Analysis 3: 51–88.Google Scholar
Bollerslev, Tim. 1986. “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics 31: 307–327.Google Scholar
Bollerslev, Tim. 1990. “Modeling the Coherence in Short-Run Nominal Exchange Rates: A Multivariate Generalized Arch Model.” Review of Economics and Statistics 72: 498–505.Google Scholar
Bollerslev, Tim, and Mikkelsen, Hans O. 1996. “Modeling and Pricing Long-Memory in Stock Market Volatility.” Journal of Econometrics 73: 151–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Smith, Renee M. 1996. “The Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship.” American Political Science Review 90: 567–580.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hinckley, Barbara. 1991. “The Structure of Presidential Approval.” Journal of Politics 53: 993–1017.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hinckley, Barbara. 1992. Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and Modern Presidencies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brehm, John, and Gronke, Paul. 1994. “Modeling Volatile Approval: A Modified ARCH Approach to Presidential Approval Ratings.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Dacorogna, Michael M., Gencay, Ramazan, Muller, Ulrich A., Olsen, Richard B., and Pictet, Olivier. 2001. An Introduction to High Frequency Finance. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
DeBoef, Suzanna. 2000. “Modeling Equilibrium Relationships: Error Correction Models with Strongly Autoregressive Data.” Political Analysis 9: 78–94.Google Scholar
Diebold, Francis X., Lee, Joon Haeng, and Weinbach, Gretchen C. 1994. “Regime-Switching with Time-Varying Transition Probabilities.” In Nonstationary Time Series Analysis and Cointegration, ed. Hargreaves, C. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 283–302.Google Scholar
Engle, Robert. 1982. “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation.” Econometrica 50: 987–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, Robert. 1996. “The Econometrics of Ultra-High Frequency Data.” NBER Paper No. 5816.Google Scholar
Foster, Douglas, and Vishwanathan, Swaminathan. 1995. “Can Speculative Trading Explain the Volume-Volatility Relation?” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics October: 379–396.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles. 2001. “Pre-election Polls in Nation and State: A Dynamic Bayesian Hierarchical Model.” Presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert. 2002. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 369–421.Google Scholar
Freeman, John, Hays, Jude C., and Stix, Helmut. 1999. “The Electoral Information Hypothesis Revisited.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Freeman, John, Hays, Jude C., and Stix, Helmut. 2000. “Democracy and Markets: The Case of Exchange Rates.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, Ronald A., Rossi, Peter E., and Tauchen, George. 1992. “Stock Prices and Volume.” Review of Financial Studies 5: 199–242.Google Scholar
Garcia, Rene. 1998. “Asymptotic Null Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio Test in a Markov-Switching Model.” International Economic Review 39: 763–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Erik. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D. 1989. “A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle.” Econometrica 57: 357–384.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D., and Susmel, Raul. 1994. “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity and Changes in Regime.” Journal of Econometrics 64: 307–333.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bruce E. 1992. “The Likelihood Ratio Test under Non-standard Conditions: Testing the Markov Switching Model of GNP.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 7: S61–S82.Google Scholar
Herron, Michael. 2000. “Estimating the Economic Impact of Political Party Competition in the 1992 British Election.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 326–337.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. 1987. The American Political Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Simon. 1995. “Re-thinking Equilibrium Presidential Approval: Markov-Switching Error Correction.” Presented at the Methods Conference, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Chang-Jin, Morley, James C., and Nelson, Charles R. 2002. “Is There a Positive Relationship between Stock Market Volatility and the Equity Premium?” Unpublished manuscript, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Kothari, Shanker P., and Shanken, Jay. 1992. “Stock Return Variation and Excess Dividends: A Time-Series and Cross-Sectional Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 31: 177–210.Google Scholar
Leblang, David, and Bernhard, William. 2000. “Speculative Attacks in Industrial Democracies: The Role of Politics.” International Organization 54: 291–324.Google Scholar
Leblang, David, and Mukherjee, Bumba. 2004. “Elections, Partisan Politics and Stock Market Performance: Theory and Evidence from a Century of American and British Returns.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Mackuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83: 1125–1142.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2002. Polarized Politics in the Transfer State. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona. 2003. “Coalition Formation and Stock Price Volatility.” Unpublished manuscript, New York University.Google Scholar
Meese, Richard. 1990. “Currency Fluctuations in the Post-Bretton Woods Era.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 117–134.Google Scholar
Mincer, Jacob, and Zarnowitz, Victor. 1969. “The Evaluation of Economic Forecasts.” In Economic Forecasts and Expectations, ed. Mincer, Jacob. New York: National Bureau of Research, pp. 124–139.Google Scholar
Nelson, Daniel B. 1991. “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach.” Econometrica 59: 347–370.Google Scholar
Pagan, Adrian R., and Schwert, William G. 1990. “Alternative Models of Stock Volatility.” Journal of Econometrics 45: 267–290.Google Scholar
Quinn, Dennis P., and Woolley, John T. 2001. “Democracy and National Economic Performance: The Preference for Stability.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 634–657.Google Scholar
Sola, Martin, and Timmerman, Allan G. 1994. “Fitting the Moments: A Comparison of ARCH and Regime-Switching Models for Daily Stock Returns.” Unpublished manuscript, London Business School.Google Scholar
Sowell, Fallow. 1992. “Modelling Long Run Behavior with the Fractional ARIMA Model.” Journal of Monetary Economics 29: 277–302.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., Mackuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89: 543–565.Google Scholar
Timmerman, Allan G. 1996. “Excess Volatility and Predictability of Stock Prices in Autoregressive Models with Learning.” Review of Economic Studies 63: 523–557.Google Scholar
Turner, Christopher M., Startz, Richard, and Nelson, Charles R. 1989. “A Markov Model of Heteroskedasticity, Risk and Learning in the Stock Market.” Journal of Financial Economics 25: 3–22.Google Scholar
Van Norden, Simon, and Schaller, Huntley. 1997. “Regime-Switching in Stock-Market Returns.” Applied Financial Economics 7: 177–191.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2001. “On Forecasting the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 25–31.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, and Erikson, Robert. 2001. “Campaign Effects in Theory and Practice.” American Politics Research 29: 419–436.Google Scholar