Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models

  • Xiang Zhou (a1) and Geoffrey T. Wodtke (a2)

Abstract

When making causal inferences, post-treatment confounders complicate analyses of time-varying treatment effects. Conditioning on these variables naively to estimate marginal effects may inappropriately block causal pathways and may induce spurious associations between treatment and the outcome, leading to bias. To avoid such bias, researchers often use marginal structural models (MSMs) with inverse probability weighting (IPW). However, IPW requires models for the conditional distributions of treatment and is highly sensitive to their misspecification. Moreover, IPW is relatively inefficient, susceptible to finite-sample bias, and difficult to use with continuous treatments. We introduce an alternative method of constructing weights for MSMs, which we call “residual balancing”. In contrast to IPW, it requires modeling the conditional means of the post-treatment confounders rather than the conditional distributions of treatment, and it is therefore easier to use with continuous treatments. Numeric simulations suggest that residual balancing is both more efficient and more robust to model misspecification than IPW and its variants in a variety of scenarios. We illustrate the method by estimating (a) the cumulative effect of negative advertising on election outcomes and (b) the controlled direct effect of shared democracy on public support for war. Open-source software is available for implementing the proposed method.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

Contributing Editor: Jeff Gill

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Acharya, A., Blackwell, M., and Sen, M.. 2016. “Explaining Causal Findings without Bias: Detecting and Assessing Direct Effects.” American Political Science Review 110(3):512529.10.1017/S0003055416000216
Athey, S., Imbens, G. W., and Wager, S.. 2018. “Approximate Residual Balancing: Debiased Inference of Average Treatment Effects in High Dimensions.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 80(4):597623.10.1111/rssb.12268
Blackwell, M. 2013. “A Framework for Dynamic Causal Inference in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 57(2):504520.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00626.x
Cole, S. R., and Hernán, M. A.. 2008. “Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models.” American Journal of Epidemiology 168(6):656664.10.1093/aje/kwn164
Fong, C., Hazlett, C., and Imai, K. et al. . 2018. “Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for a Continuous Treatment: Application to the Efficacy of Political Advertisements.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 12(1):156177.10.1214/17-AOAS1101
Hainmueller, J. 2012. “Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies.” Political Analysis 20(1):2546.10.1093/pan/mpr025
Imai, K., and Kim, I. S.. 2019. “When Should We Use Unit Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data?American Journal of Political Science 63(2):467490.10.1111/ajps.12417
Imai, K., and Ratkovic, M.. 2014. “Covariate Balancing Propensity Score.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 76(1):243263.10.1111/rssb.12027
Imai, K., and Ratkovic, M.. 2015. “Robust Estimation of Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 110(511):10131023.10.1080/01621459.2014.956872
Kang, J. D. Y., and Schafer, J. L.. 2007. “Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.” Statistical Science 22(4):523539.10.1214/07-STS227
Ladam, C., Harden, J. J., and Windett, J. H.. 2018. “Prominent Role Models: High-Profile Female Politicians and the Emergence of Women as Candidates for Public Office.” American Journal of Political Science 62(2):369381.10.1111/ajps.12351
Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., and Rovner, I. B.. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69(4):11761209.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
Naimi, A. I., Moodie, E. E. M., Auger, N., and Kaufman, J. S.. 2014. “Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Continuous Exposures: A Comparison of Methods.” Epidemiology 25(2):292299.10.1097/EDE.0000000000000053
Newey, W. K. 1994. “The Asymptotic Variance of Semiparametric Estimators.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 62(6):13491382.10.2307/2951752
Pearl, J. 2001. “Direct and Indirect Effects.” In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 411420. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Pearl, J. 2009. Causality. 2nd Edition.New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803161
Robins, J. M. 1986. “A New Approach to Causal Inference in Mortality Studies with a Sustained Exposure Period-Application to Control of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect.” Mathematical Modelling 7(9–12):13931512.10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6
Robins, J. M. 2000. “Marginal Structural Models versus Structural Nested Models as Tools for Causal Inference.” In Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials, edited by Halloran, E. M. and Berry, D., 95133. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-1284-3_2
Robins, J. M. 2003. “Semantics of Causal DAG models and the Identification of Direct and Indirect effects.” Highly Structured Stochastic Systems 27:7081.
Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., and Brumback, B.. 2000. “Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology.” Epidemiology 11(5):550560.10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011
Simmons, B. A., and Creamer, C. D.. 2019. “Do Self-Reporting Regimes Matter? Evidence From the Convention Against Torture.” International Studies Quarterly 63(4):10511064.
Tomz, M. R., and Weeks, J. L.. 2013. “Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 107:849865.10.1017/S0003055413000488
VanderWeele, T. 2015. Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vansteelandt, S. 2009. “Estimating Direct Effects in Cohort and Case–Control Studies.” Epidemiology 20(6):851860.10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181b6f4c9
Wang, Y., and Zubizarreta, J. R.. Forthcoming. “Minimal Approximately Balancing Weights: Asymptotic Properties and Practical Considerations.” Biometrica, DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asz050.
Wang, Y., Petersen, M. L., Bangsberg, D., and van der Laan, M. J.. 2006. “Diagnosing Bias in the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighted Estimator Resulting from Violation of Experimental Treatment Assignment”. University of California, Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Paper 211. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/61320389.pdf.
Wodtke, G. T., Harding, D. J., and Elwert, F.. 2011. “Neighborhood Effects in Temporal Perspective: The impact of Long-term Exposure to Concentrated Disadvantage on High School Graduation.” American Sociological Review 76(5):713736.10.1177/0003122411420816
Zhao, Q. 2019. “Covariate Balancing Propensity Score by Tailored Loss Functions.” The Annals of Statistics 47(2):965993.10.1214/18-AOS1698
Zhao, Q., and Percival, D.. 2017. “Entropy Balancing is Doubly Robust.” Journal of Causal Inference 5(1): 20160010.
Zhou, X., and Wodtke, G. T.. 2019. “A Regression-with-Residuals Method for Estimating Controlled Direct Effects.” Political Analysis 27(3):360369.10.1017/pan.2018.53
Zhou, X., and Wodtke, G. T.. 2020. “Replication Data for: Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models.” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VZFXYW, Harvard Dataverse, V1.
Zhukov, Y. M. 2017. “External Resources and Indiscriminate Violence: Evidence from German-Occupied Belarus.” World Politics 69(1):5497.10.1017/S0043887116000137
Zubizarreta, J. R. 2015. “Stable Weights that Balance Covariates for Estimation with Incomplete Outcome Data.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 110(511):910922.10.1080/01621459.2015.1023805
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Zhou and Wodtke supplementary material
Zhou and Wodtke supplementary material

 Unknown (453 KB)
453 KB

Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models

  • Xiang Zhou (a1) and Geoffrey T. Wodtke (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.