Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-m744c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-13T00:08:41.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

African Borders as Sources of Natural Experiments Promise and Pitfalls*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2014

Abstract

Africa’s arbitrary country borders have been seized upon as sources of“natural experiments”: having randomly assigned people to different countrytreatments, differences in outcomes on either side of the border can then beattributed to the institutions, demographics, or policies put in place ineach country. While methodologically attractive, the use of African bordersas sources of natural experiments presents several potential pitfalls. Wedescribe these pitfalls—some common to all studies that employjurisdictional boundaries, some unique to African borders—and offerguidelines for overcoming them. We conclude that African cross-borderstudies can provide research advantages similar to well-executed comparativecase studies, but that they frequently offer weaker inferential leveragethan is claimed.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable