Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-ns2hh Total loading time: 0.27 Render date: 2022-10-03T03:17:32.929Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Globalization and the Demand-Side of Politics: How Globalization Shapes Labor Market Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2015

Abstract

Does globalization affect the demand-side of politics, and if so, how? This paper builds on new developments in trade theory to argue that globalization matters, but that its effects on individuals’ perceptions of labor market risk and policy preferences are more heterogenous than previous research has acknowledged. Globalization exposure increases risk perceptions and demands for social protection among low-skilled individuals, but decreases them among high-skilled individuals. This conditional effect is observationally distinct from classic trade models as well as arguments that deindustrialization or ideology predominantly drive such perceptions and preferences. Analyzing cross-national survey data from 16 European countries and focusing both on trade and offshoring, the empirical analyses support the prediction that exposure to globalization affects high- and low-skilled individuals differently, leading to variation in labor market risk perceptions and policy preferences.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Stefanie Walter, Professor for International Relations and Political Economy, Institute for Political Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstr. 56, Zurich 8037 (walter@ipz.uzh.ch). Previous versions of this paper were presented at the ECPR General Conference 2009 and the IPES Annual Meeting 2010. Ruth Beckmann, Linda Maduz, Tobias Rommel and Philipp Trein provided excellent research assistance. The author would like to thank Daniel Finke, Jeff Frieden, Mike Hiscox, Mark Kayser, Philipp Rehm, David Singer, Marco Steenbergen, the participants in the Research Workshop in Political Economy at Harvard University, the IPW Brown Bag Seminar at University of Heidelberg, and the MZES Kolloquium, the IPZ Publication Workshop, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

References

Anderson, Christopher, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2007. ‘Workers, Worries, and Welfare States: Social Protection and Job Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries’. European Journal of Political Research 46(2):211235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy. The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, Andrew, and Jensen, Bradford. 1995. ‘Exporters, Jobs, and Wages in U.S. Manufacturing: 1976–1987’. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1995:67112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Andrew, and Jensen, Bradford. 2004. ‘Why Some Firms Export’. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(2):561569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Alan. 2009. ‘How Many U.S. Jobs Might Be Offshoreable’. World Economics 10(2):4178.Google Scholar
Cameron, David. 1978. ‘The Expansion of the Public Economy’. American Political Science Review 72(4):12431261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Rafaela, and Walter, Stefanie. 2015. ‘Globalization, Labor Market Risks, and Class Cleavages’. In Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds), The politics of advanced capitalism, 133156. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. 1992. ‘The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State’. American Journal of Political Science 36(1):268307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, Ronald, and Kierzkowski, Henryk. 1983. ‘International Trade and Human Capital: A Simple General Equilibrium Model’. The Journal of Political Economy 91(6):957978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry, and Rogowski, Ronald. 1996. ‘The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview’. In Robert Keohane and Helen Milner (eds), Internationalization and Domestic Politics, 2547. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael J.. 2006. ‘Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade’. International Organization 60(2):469498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Ann, McLaren, John, and McMillan, Margaret. 2011. ‘Recent Perspectives on Trade and Inequality’. Annual Review of Economics 3(1):261289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude, Ehrlich, Sean, and Peinhardt, Clint. 2005. ‘Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis’. International Organization 59(2):473494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan, Itskhoki, Oleg, and Redding, Stephen. 2008. ‘Inequality and Unemployment in a Global Economy’. Working Paper No. 14478. Cambridge: NBER.Google Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan, Itskhoki, Oleg, and Redding, Stephen. 2010. ‘Inequality and Unemployment in a Global Economy’. Econometrica 78(4):12391283.Google Scholar
Hiscox, Michael. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. ‘An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences’. American Political Science Review 95(4):875893.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Cusack, Thomas. 2000. ‘The Causes of Welfare State Expansion. Deindustrialization or Globalization?’. World Politics 52(3):313349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, Mads Meier. 2008. ‘Does Left–Right Orientation have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution? Causal Analysis with Cross-Sectional Data Using Instrumental Variables’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(3):363374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Bradford, and Kletzer, Lori. 2010. ‘Measuring Tradable Services and the Task Content of Offshorable Services Jobs’. In Katherine Abraham, James Spletzer and Michael Harper (eds), Labor in the New Economy, 309335. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Bradford, Kletzer, Lori, Bernstein, Jared, and Feenstra, Robert. 2005. ‘Tradable Services: Understanding the Scope and Impact of Services Offshoring [with Comments and Discussion]’. Brookings Trade Forum 1(2005):75133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Patricia. 2001. ‘Are Educated Workers Really More Productive?’. Journal of Development Economics 64:5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, So Young. 2007. ‘Openness, External Risk, and Volatility: Implications for the Compensation Hypothesis’. International Organization 61(1):181216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Hyeok Yong, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2010. ‘Globalization, Labour Power and Partisan Politics Revisited’. Socio-Economic Review 8(2):251281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Mutz, Diana. 2009. ‘Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety’. International Organization 63(2):425457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Yotam. 2011. ‘Costly Jobs: Trade-Related Layoffs, Government Compensation, and Voting in U.S. Elections’. American Political Science Review 105(1):166188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Yotam. 2013. ‘Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession’. American Political Science Review 107(1):80103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. ‘Why are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?’. European Economic Review 49(6):13931430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, Marc. 2003. ‘The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity’. Econometrica 71(6):16951725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’. The Journal of Political Economy 89(5):914927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munch, Jakob Roland, and Skaksen, Jan Rose. 2008. ‘Human Capital and Wages in Exporting Firms’. Journal of International Economics 75:363372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. ‘Post-Industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare States’. In Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, 80104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2009. ‘Risks and Redistribution. An Individual-Level Analysis’. Comparative Political Studies 42(7):855881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Armin. 2012. ‘Consequences of Social Inequality for Democracy in Western Europe’. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 6(2):2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2006. ‘Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(3):255286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Slaughter, Matthew. 2001. ‘What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences?’. Journal of International Economics 54(2):267292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Slaughter, Matthew. 2004. ‘Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production’. American Journal of Political Science 48(4):662674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitz-Oener, Alexandra. 2006. ‘Technological Change, Job Tasks, and Rising Educational Demands: Looking Outside the Wage Structure’. Journal of Labour Economics 24(2):235270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 1997. ‘Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations’. European Sociological Review 13(3):283304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, Hal. 1980. ‘Redistributive Taxation as Social Insurance’. Journal of Public Economics 14(1):4968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Joachim. 2007. ‘Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm-Level Data’. The World Economy 30(1):6082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Stefanie. 2010. ‘Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundations of the Compensation Hypothesis’. International Studies Quarterly 54(2):403426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Stefanie, and Maduz, Linda. 2009. ‘How Globalization Shapes Individual Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences. A Cross-National Analysis of Differences Between Globalization Winners and Losers’. WCFIA Working Paper Series. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Wren, Anne, and Rehm, Philipp. 2013. ‘Service Expansion, International Exposure, and Political Preferences’. In Anne Wren (ed.), The Political Economy of the Service Transition, 248281. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Globalization and the Demand-Side of Politics: How Globalization Shapes Labor Market Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Globalization and the Demand-Side of Politics: How Globalization Shapes Labor Market Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Globalization and the Demand-Side of Politics: How Globalization Shapes Labor Market Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *