Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Gaffe Appeal A Field Experiment on Partisan Selective Exposure to Election Messages*


The possibility that citizens expose themselves to information in biased ways—so-called selective exposure—has acquired new importance as the media environment has evolved to provide more choices concerning what to watch and read. But evidence for the most prominent idea in selective exposure research—that citizens prefer attitude-consistent information—is notably mixed. Methodological challenges likely contribute to the inconclusive nature of findings, as researchers face trade-offs between the artificiality of lab environments and the difficult-to-disentangle confounds of observational analysis. We improve understanding of selective exposure in two ways. First, we consider how message aspects other than attitude-consistency affect exposure decisions. Second, we study selective exposure with an innovative field experiment conducted in the United States that addresses limitations of other approaches. Our results allow us to reach more confident conclusions about the prevalence of motivated selective exposure, and help to illuminate underpinnings of the oft-lamented tendency for campaign media to focus on candidate miscues rather than substantive policy differences.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Gaffe Appeal A Field Experiment on Partisan Selective Exposure to Election Messages*
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Gaffe Appeal A Field Experiment on Partisan Selective Exposure to Election Messages*
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Gaffe Appeal A Field Experiment on Partisan Selective Exposure to Election Messages*
      Available formats
Hide All

Timothy J. Ryan is an Assistant Professor of Political Science, Department of Political Science, 361 Hamilton Hall, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3265 ( Ted Brader is a Professor of Political Science, Department of Political Science, 5700 Haven Hall, University of Michigan, 505 S. State St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1045 ( We are thankful to David Broockman and Donald Green for comments on an earlier draft, though errors are our own. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit

Hide All
AldrichJohn H., GronkePaul, and GrynaviskiJeff. 1999. ‘Policy, Personality, and Presidential Performance’. Paper presented at the 1999 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, IL, 15–18 April.
ArceneauxKevin, and JohnsonMartin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
BarberáPablo N.d. ‘How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization: Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S’, Unpublished manuscript, New York University, New York, NY.
BaumMatthew A. 2002. ‘Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public’. American Political Science Review 96(1):91109.
BennettW. Lance, and IyengarShanto. 2008. ‘A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication’. Journal of Communication 58(4):707731.
BroockmanDavid E., and GreenDonald P.. 2014. ‘Do Online Advertisements Increase Political Candidates’ Name Recognition or Favorability? Evidence From Randomized Field Experiments’. Political Behavior 36:263289.
BullockJohn G., GerberAlan S., HillSeth J., and HuberGregory A. 2013. ‘Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs About Politics’. Working Paper. Available at, accessed 20 December 2013.
CampbellAngus, ConversePhilip E., MillerWarren E., and StokesDonald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CappellaJoseph, and JamiesonKathleen H.. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism. New York: Oxford University Press.
ChaffeeSteven H., and MetzgerMiriam J.. 2001. ‘The End of Mass Communication?’. Mass Communication & Society 4(4):365379.
ChayKenneth Y., and PowellJames L.. 2001. ‘Semiparametric Censored Regression Models’. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4):2942.
CombsDavid J.Y., PowellCaitlin A.J., SchurtzDavid R., and SmithRichard H.. 2009. ‘Politics, Schadenfreude, and Ingroup Identification: The Sometimes Happy Thing About a Poor Economy and Death’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45:635646.
ConversePhilip E. 1962. ‘Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes’. Public Opinion Quarterly 26(4):578599.
De BoefSuzanna, and KellstedtPaul M.. 2004. ‘The Political (and Economic) Origins of Consumer Confidence’. American Journal of Political Science 48(4):633649.
EpsteinJay E. 1973. News from Nowhere. New York: Random House.
FeatherN.T., and ShermanRebecca. 2002. ‘Envy, Resentment, Schadenfreude, and Sympathy: Reactions to Deserved and Undeserved Achievement and Subsequent Failure’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(7):953961.
FestingerLeon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
FiorinaMorris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
FiorinaMorris P. 1990. ‘Information and Rationality in Elections’. In John Ferejohn and James Kuklinski (eds), Information and Democratic Processes, 329342. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
FreedmanDavid A. 2008. ‘On Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data’. Advances in Applied Mathematics 40(2):180193.
GadarianShana K., and AlbertsonBethany. 2014. ‘Anxiety, Immigration, and the Search for Information’. Political Psychology 35(2):133164.
GerberAlan S., and GreenDonald P.. 2013. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
GerberAlan S., and HuberGregory A.. 2010. ‘Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments’. American Journal of Political Science 54:153173.
GraberDoris A. 1988. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York: Longman.
GraberDoris A. 1997. Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
GreenDonald P., PalmquistBradley, and SchicklerEric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
GreenDonald P., and AronowPeter. 2011. ‘Analyzing Experimental Data Using Regression: When is Bias a Practical Concern?’ Working Paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
GreeneWilliam H. 1981. ‘On the Asymptotic Bias of the Ordinary Least Squares Estimator of the Tobit Model’. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 49(2):505513.
GreeneWilliam H. 2008. Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
GroelingTimothy. 2010. When Parties Attack. New York: Cambridge University Press.
GroenendykEric. 2013. Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind: How Loyalty and Responsiveness Shape Party Identification and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harmon-JonesEddie, and MillsJudson. 1999. ‘An Introduction to Cognitive Dissonance Theory and an Overview of Current Perspectives on the Theory’. In Eddie Harmon-Jones and Judson Mills (ed.), Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology. 321. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
HartWilliam, AlbarracínDolores, EaglyAlice H., BrechanInge, LindbergMatthew J., and MerrillLisa. 2009. ‘Feeling Validated Versus Being Correct: A Meta-Analysis of Selective Exposure to Information’. Psychological Bulletin 135(4):555588.
HealyAndrew, and LenzGabriel S.. 2013. ‘Substituting the End for the Whole: Why Voters Respond Primarily to the Election-Year Economy’. American Journal of Political Science 58(1):3147.
HetheringtonMarc J. 1996. ‘The Media’s Role in Forming Voters’ National Economic Evaluations in 1992’. American Journal of Political Science 40(2):372395.
HibbsDouglas R. 2000. ‘Bread and Peace Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections’. Public Choice 104:149180.
IyengarShanto, and HahnKyu S.. 2009. ‘Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use’. Journal of Communication 59(1):1939.
IyengarShanto, HahnKyu S., KrosnickJon A., and WalkerJohn J.. 2008. ‘Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership’. The Journal of Politics 70(1):186200.
IyengarShanto, SoodGaurav, and LelkesYphtach. 2012. ‘Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization’. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3):405431.
KatzElihu, and LazarsfeldPaul F.. 1955. Personal Influence. New York: Free Press.
KieslerCharles A. 1971. The Psychology of Commitment. New York: Academic Press.
KinderDonald R. 1986. ‘Presidential Character Revisited’. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds), Political Cognition: The Nineteenth Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, 233255. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
KinderDonald R. 2003. ‘Communication and Politics in the Age of Information’. In David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy and Robert Jervis (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 357393. New York: Oxford University Press.
KinderDonald R., and Roderick KiewietD.. 1981. ‘Sociotropic Politics: The American Case’. British Journal of Political Science 11(2):129161.
KruglanskiArie W., and WebsterDonna M.. 1996. ‘Motivated Closing of the Mind: “Seizing” and “Freezing”.’ Psychological Review 103(2):263283.
KundaZiva. 1990. ‘The Case for Motivated Reasoning’. Psychological Bulletin 108(3):480498.
KurzbanRobert, and Athena AktipisC.. 2007. ‘Modularity and the Social Mind: Are Psychologists Too Self-Ish?’. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11:131149.
KrupnikovYanna. 2011. ‘When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout’. American Journal of Political Science 55(4):797813.
LauRichard, and RedlawskDavid. 2001. ‘Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making’. American Journal of Political Science 45(4):951971.
LawrenceEric, SidesJohn, and FarrellHenry. 2010. ‘Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics’. Perspectives on Politics 8(1):141157.
LazarsfeldPaul F., BerelsonBernard, and GaudetHazel. 1948. The People’s Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LinWinston. 2013. ‘Agnostic Notes on Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Reexamining Freeman’s Critique’. Annals of Applied Statistics 7(1):295318.
LippmannWalter. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy. New York: New American Library.
LoSciutoLeonard A. 1972. ‘A National Inventory of Television Viewing Behavior’. In Eli A., Rubinstein, George A. Comstock and John P. Murray (eds), Television and Social Behavior. Televisions in Day-to-Day Life: Patterns of Use, 3386. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
MacKuenMichael, EriksonRobert, and StimsonJames. 1992. ‘Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy’. American Political Science Review 86(3):597611.
MahapatraLisa. 2013. ‘The Economics of Prime Time: How Much Does it Cost to Place a 30 Second Ad in a Prime Time Weeknight Show?’ International Business Times, 14 October. Available at, accessed May 25, 2014.
MasonLilliana. 2014. ‘I Disrespectfully Agree: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization’. American Journal of Political Science 59(1):128145.
MercierHugo, and SperberDan. 2011. ‘Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34(1):5774.
MutzDiana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MutzDiana C., and ReevesByron. 2005. ‘The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust’. American Political Science Review 99(1):115.
NeumanW. Russell, JustMarion R., and CriglerAnn N.. 1992. Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
NyhanBrendan. 2014. ‘Scandal Potential: How Political Context and News Congestion Affect the President’s Vulnerability to Media Scandal’. British Journal of Political Science 45(2):435466.
Parker-StephenEvan. 2013. ‘Tides of Disagreement: How Reality Facilitates (and Inhibits) Partisan Public Opinion’. Journal of Politics 75(4):10771088.
PattersonThomas E. 1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.
PattersonThomas E. 2000. ‘Doing Well and Doing Good: How Soft News and Critical Journalism Are Shrinking the News Audience and Weakening Democracy–And What News Outlets Can Do About It’. Faculty Research Working Paper Series No. RWP01-001, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
PattersonThomas E., and McClureRobert D.. 1976. The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
PettyRichard, and CacioppoJohn T.. 2011. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer.
PopkinSamuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
PortmannJohn. 2000. When Bad Things Happen to Other People. New York: Routledge.
PriorMarkus. 2003. ‘Any Good News in Soft News? The Impact of Soft News Preference on Political Knowledge’. Political Communication 20(2):149171.
PriorMarkus. 2005. ‘News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout’. American Journal of Political Science 49(3):577592.
PriorMarkus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
PriorMarkus. 2013. ‘Media and Political Polarization’. Annual Review of Political Science 16:101127.
RahnWendy, AldrichJohn, BorgidaEugene, and SullivanJohn. 1990. ‘A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal’. In John Ferejohn and James Kuklinski (eds), Information and Democratic Processes, 136159. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
RedlawskDavid P. 2002. ‘Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making’. The Journal of Politics 64(4):10211044.
ReinemannCarsten, StanyerJames, ScherrSebastian, and LegnanteGuido. 2012. ‘Hard and Soft News: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations, and Key Findings’. Journalism 13(2):221239.
RobinsonMichael J. 1976. ‘Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of the Selling of the Pentagon’. American Political Science Review 70(2):409432.
RyanTimothy J. 2012. ‘What Makes Us Click? Demonstrating Incentives for Angry Discourse with Digital-Age Field Experiments’. The Journal of Politics 74(4):11381152.
RyanTimothy J., and BroockmanDavid E.. 2012. ‘Facebook: A New Frontier for Field Experiments’. Newsletter of the APSA Experimental Section 3(2):210.
SabatoLarry J. 2000. Feeding Frenzy: Attack Journalism and American Politics. New York: Lanahan.
SearsDavid O., and FreedmanJonathan. 1967. ‘Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review’. The Public Opinion Quarterly 31(2):194213.
SteeleClaude M. 1988. ‘The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self’. In Leonard Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 261302. New York: Academic Press.
StroudNatalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
StroudNatalie Jomini, and MuddimanAshley. 2013. ‘Selective Exposure, Tolerance, and Satirical News’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25(3):271290.
TaberCharles, and LodgeMilton. 2006. ‘Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs’. American Journal of Political Science 50(3):755769.
ValentinoNicholas A., BanksAntoine J., HutchingsVincent L., and DavisAnne K.. 2009. ‘Selective Exposure in the Internet Age: The Interaction Between Anxiety and Information Utility’. Political Psychology 30(4):591613.
van DijkWilco, OuwerkerkJaap, GoslingaSjoerd, and NiewegMyrke. 2005. ‘Deservingness and Schadenfreude’. Cognition and Emotion 19(6):933939.
van DijkWilco, OuwerkerkJaap, and GoslingaSjoerd. 2009. ‘The Impact of Deservingness on Schadenfreude and Sympathy: Further Evidence’. The Journal of Social Psychology 149(3):390392.
VavreckLynn. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
VerbaSidney, SchlozmanKay Lehman, and BradyHenry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Ryan and Brader supplementary material
Ryan and Brader supplementary material 2

 PDF (211 KB)
211 KB
Supplementary Materials

Ryan and Brader supplementary material
Ryan and Brader supplementary material 1

 Word (90 KB)
90 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 62 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 286 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.