Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Endogenous democracy: causal evidence from the potato productivity shock in the old world

  • Joan Barceló (a1) and Guillermo Rosas (a2)

Abstract

Despite a high cross-country correlation between development and democracy, it is difficult to gauge the impact of economic development on the probability that autocracies will transition to democracy because of endogeneity, especially due to reverse causation and omitted variable bias. Hence, whether development causes democracy remains a contested issue. We exploit exogeneity in the regional variation of potato cultivation along with the timing of the introduction of potatoes to the Old World (i.e., a potato productivity shock) to identify a causal effect of urbanization, a proxy for economic development, on democratization. Our results, which hold under sensitivity analyses that question the validity of the exclusion restriction, present new evidence of the existence of a causal effect of economic development on democracy.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. joan.barcelo@nyu.edu

References

Hide All
Acemoglu, D, Johnson, S and Robinson, JA (2002) Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 12311294.
Acemoglu, D, Johnson, S, Robinson, JA and Yared, P (2008) Income and democracy. The American Economic Review 98, 808842.
Benhabib, J, Corvalan, A and Spiegel, MM (2013) Income and democracy: evidence from nonlinear estimations. Economics Letters 118, 489492.
Boix, C (2011) Democracy, development, and the international system. American Political Science Review 105, 809828.
Boix, C and Stokes, SC (2003) Endogenous democratization. In World Politics. Cambridge, UK, Vol. 55, pp. 517549. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0019.
Brunk, GG, Caldeira, GA and Lewis-Beck, MS (1987) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy: an empirical inquiry. European Journal of Political Research 15, 459470.
Burkhart, RE and Lewis-Beck, MS (1994) Comparative democracy: the economic development thesis. American Political Science Review 88, 903910.
Cervellati, M, Jung, F, Sunde, U and Vischer, T (2014) Income and democracy: comment. The American Economic Review 104, 707719.
Conley, TG, Hansen, CB and Rossi, PE (2012) Plausibly exogenous. Review of Economics and Statistics 94, 260272.
De Long, JB and Shleifer, A (2011) Princes and merchants: city growth before the industrial revolution. Journal of Law and Economics 36, 671702.
Dunning, T (2012) Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences. A Design-Based Approach. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, DL, Bates, R, Goldstone, J, Kristensen, I and O'Halloran, S (2006) Democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science 50, 551569.
Food and Agriculture Organization (2002) Global Agro-Ecological Zones. Available at: http://www.fao.org/nr/gaez/en/.
Gundlach, E and Paldam, M (2009) A farewell to critical junctures: sorting out long-run causality of income and democracy. European Journal of Political Economy 25, 340354.
Heid, B, Langer, J and Larch, M (2012) Income and democracy: evidence from system GMM estimates. Economics Letters 116, 166169.
Iyigun, M, Nunn, N and Qian, N (2015) Agricultural Productivity and Conflict: Evidence from Potatoes, 1400-1900 (Unpublished manuscript). September.
Lipset, SM (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53, 69105.
Londregan, JB and Poole, KT (1996) Does high income promote democracy? World Politics 49, 130.
Lundberg, AL, Huynh, KP and Jacho-Chávez, DT (2016) Income and democracy: a smooth varying coefficient Redux. Journal of Applied Econometrics 32, 719724.
Marshall, MG, Jagger, K and Robert Gurr, T (2009) Polity IV: regime authority characteristics and transition datasets, 1800-2009 [Data file], October 10. Available on-line at http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/inscr.htm.
Moral-Benito, E and Bartolucci, C (2012) Income and democracy: revisiting the evidence. Economics Letters 117, 844847.
Nunn, N and Qian, N (2011) The Potato's contribution to population and urbanization: evidence from a historical experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126, 593650.
Przeworski, A and Limongi, F (1997) Modernization: theories and facts. World Politics 49, 155183.
Przeworski, A, Alvarez, ME, Antonio Cheibub, J and Limongi, F (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sovey, AJ and Green, DP (2011) Instrumental variables estimation in political science: a readers' guide. American Journal of Political Science 55, 188200.
Staiger, D and Stock, JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65, 557586.
Weingast, BR (1995) The economic role of political institutions: market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 11, 131.

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Barceló and Rosas supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (211 KB)
211 KB

Endogenous democracy: causal evidence from the potato productivity shock in the old world

  • Joan Barceló (a1) and Guillermo Rosas (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed