Skip to main content Accessibility help

Estimating subnational preferences across the European Union

  • Jana Lipps (a1) and Dominik Schraff (a1)


Subnational analyses of political preferences are substantively relevant and offer advantages for causal inference. Yet, our knowledge on regional political preferences across Europe is limited, not least because there is a lack of adequate data. The rich Eurobarometer (EB) data is a promising source for European-wide regional information. Yet, it is only representative for the national level. This paper compares state-of-the-art methods for estimating regional preferences from nationally representative EB data, validating predictions with regionally representative surveys. Our analysis highlights a number of challenges for estimating regional preferences across Europe, such as data availability, variable selection, and over-fitting. We find that predictions are best using a Bayesian additive regression tree with synthetic post-stratification.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Beramendi, P (2012) The Political Geography of Inequality. Regions and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Buttice, MK and Highton, B (2013) How does multilevel regression and poststratification perform with conventional national surveys. Political Analysis 21, 449467.
Chipman, HA, George, EI and McCulloch, RE (2012) BART: Bayesian additive regression trees. Annals of Applied Statistics 6, 266298.
Foster, C and Frieden, J (2017) Crisis of trust: socio-economic determinants of Europeans' confidence in government. European Union Politics 18, 511535.
Georgiadou, V, Rori, L and Roumanias, C. 2018. Mapping the European far right in the 21st century: a meso-level analysis. Electoral Studies 54, 103115. Available at
Ghitza, Y and Gelman, A (2013) Deep interactions with MRP: election turnout and voting patterns among small electoral subgroups. American Journal of Political Science 57, 762776.
Hanretty, C, Lauderdale, BE and Vivyan, N (2018) Comparing strategies for estimating constituency opinion from national survey samples. Political Science Research and Methods 6, 571591. Available at
Harkness, J (1999) In pursuit of quality: issues for cross-national survey research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2, 125140.
Jones, K, Johnston, RJ and Pattie, CJ (1992) People, places and regions: exploring the use of multi-level modelling in the analysis of electoral data. British Journal of Political Science 22, 343380.
Lax, JR and Phillips, JH (2009) How should we estimate public opinion. American Journal of Political Science 53, 107121.
Leemann, L and Wasserfallen, F (2017) Extending the use and prediction precision of subnational public opinion estimation. American Journal of Political Science 4, 10031023.
Montgomery, JM and Olivella, S (2018) Tree-based models for political science data. American Journal of Political Science 62, 729744,
Muñoz, J, Torcal, M and Bonet, E (2011) Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: congruence or compensation?. European Union Politics 12, 551574.
Pittau, MG, Zelli, R, Gelman, A (2010) Economic disparities and life satisfaction in European regions. Social Indicators Research 96, 339361.
Rodden, J (2010) The geographic distribution of political preferences. Annual Review of Political Science 13, 321340,
Saris, WE and Kaase, M (1997) Eurobarometer: measurement instruments for opinions in Europe. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen -ZUMA-. Available at
Schraff, D (2019) Regional redistribution and Eurosceptic voting. Journal of European Public Policy 26, 83105,
Toshkov, D (2015) Exploring the performance of multilevel modeling and poststratification with eurobarometer data. Political Analysis 23, 455460.
Warshaw, C and Rodden, J (2012) How should we measure district-level public opinion on individual issues? Journal of Politics 74, 203219.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Lipps and Schraff Dataset

Supplementary materials

Lipps and Schraff supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (177 KB)
177 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed