Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Extreme districts, moderate winners: Same-party challenges, and deterrence in top-two primaries

  • Jesse Crosson (a1) (a2)

Abstract

In an effort to break the link between districts' lack of competitiveness and the election of ideologues, Washington and California recently adopted the “top-two” primary election system. Among other features, the top-two primary allows members of the same party to run against one another in the general election. Although proponents argue that this system encourages the election of more moderate candidates in highly partisan districts, early reports have uncovered mixed evidence of this effect. This study addresses this puzzle by first disentangling the conditions under which one should expect such primaries to encourage the election of more moderate candidates. Using election returns data from the 2008 through 2014 elections, I find that districts facing same-party general-election competition do elect more moderate legislators than similar districts not subject to same-party competition. However, using an application of a common regression discontinuity diagnostic test, I also find that elite actors appear able to strategically avoid this kind of competition—partially explaining why broader effects of the top-two have not been uncovered. The findings contribute not only to ongoing debates about the effectiveness of the top-two primary, but also to our understanding of how political elites may maneuver institutional changes to their own benefit.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Email: jcrosson9@gmail.com

References

Hide All
Ahler, DJ, Citrin, J and Lenz, GS (2016) Do open primaries improve representation? An experimental test of California's 2012 top-two primary. Legislative Studies Quarterly 41, 237268.10.1111/lsq.12113
Bonica, A (2013) Database on ideology, money in politics, and elections: Public version 1.0 [Computer file]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries. Available at http://data.stanford.edu/dime.
Bonica, A (2014) Mapping the ideological marketplace. American Journal of Political Science 58, 367387.10.1111/ajps.12062
Bonica, A (2018) Inferring roll-call scores from campaign contributions using supervised machine learning. American Journal of Political Science 62, 830848.10.1111/ajps.12376
Canes-Wrone, B, Brady, DW and Cogan, JF (2002) Out of step, out of office: electoral accountability and house members’ voting. American Political Science Review 96, 127140.10.1017/S0003055402004276
Cohn, G (2014) In plain sight: the rise of corporate democrats in California. The Huffington Post, 15 April 2014.
Diamond, A and Sekhon, JS (2013) Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: a general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Review of Economics and Statistics 95, 932945.10.1162/REST_a_00318
Elections & Voting. Washington Secretary of State. Available at https://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/.
Grose, CR (2014) The Adoption of Electoral Reforms and Ideological Change in the California State Legislature. Los Angeles: USC Schwarzenegger Institute.
Jacob, R, Zhu, P, Somers, MA and Bloom, H (2012) A Practical guide to regression discontinuity. MDRC.
Kousser, T, Phillips, J and Shor, B (2018) Reform and representation: a new method applied to recent electoral changes. Political Science Research and Methods 6, 809827.10.1017/psrm.2016.43
McCrary, J (2006) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: a density test. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/t0334
McGhee, E and Shor, B (2017) Has the top two primary elected more moderates? Perspectives on Politics 15, 10531066.10.1017/S1537592717002158
Prior Elections. California Secretary of State. Available at http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/prior-elections/
Reed, S (2017) Interview with Sam Reed about the passage of the top-two primary in Washington. Jesse M. Crosson, interviewer.
Shor, B and McCarty, N (2011) The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review 105, 530551.10.1017/S0003055411000153
Sinclair, A (2015) Winning from the center: Frank Bigelow and California's nonpartisan primary. California Journal of Politics and Policy 7, 1.10.5070/P2CJPP7125445
Smith, KW (2016) Top-two and candidate ideologies: a quixotic quest for change. MPSA Annual Meeting Paper.
Tausanovitch, C and Warshaw, C (2013) Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. The Journal of Politics 75, 330342.10.1017/S0022381613000042
Walters, D (2014) Opinion: California's top two primary has had major impact. Sacramento Bee, 28 December 2014.

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Crosson Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Crosson supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (331 KB)
331 KB

Extreme districts, moderate winners: Same-party challenges, and deterrence in top-two primaries

  • Jesse Crosson (a1) (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed