Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Google Politics: The Political Determinants of Internet Censorship in Democracies*

Abstract

The expansion of digital interconnectivity has simultaneously increased individuals’ access to media and presented governments with new opportunities to regulate information flows. As a result, even highly democratic countries now issue frequent censorship and user data requests to digital content providers. We argue that government internet censorship occurs, in part, for political reasons, and seek to identify the conditions under which states censor. We leverage new, cross-nationally comparable, censorship request data, provided by Google, to examine how country characteristics co-vary with governments’ digital censorship activity. Within democracies, we show that governments engage in more digital censorship when internal dissent is present and when their economies produce substantial intellectual property. But these demand mechanisms are modulated by the relative influence that democratic institutions provide to narrow and diffuse interests; in particular, states with proportional electoral institutions censor less.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Stephen A. Meserve is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science, Texas Tech University, 113 Holden Hall Boston & Akron Streets, Lubbock, TX 79409 (stephen.meserve@ttu.edu), Daniel Pemstein is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Criminal Justice and Political Science, North Dakota State University, 1661 12th Avenue North, Fargo, ND 58108 (daniel.pemstein@ndsu.edu). The authors would like to thank seminar participants at Texas Tech University, the European Political Science Association conference, and the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science association, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Sivagaminathan Palani provided invaluable research assistance. The authors contributed equally to this work, which was supported, in part, by a Google Faculty Research Award. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.1

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Alberto Abadie , Alexis Diamond , and Jens Hainmueller . 2010. ‘Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490):493505.

Alberto Abadie , Alexis Diamond , and Jens Hainmueller . 2011. ‘Synth: An R Package for Synthetic Control Methods in Comparative Case Studies’. Journal of Statistical Software 42(13):117.

Peter Baldwin . 2014. The Copyright Wars: Three Centuries of Trans-Atlantic Battle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kathleen Bawn , and Michael F. Thies . 2003. ‘A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganized Under PR, Plurality and Mixed-Member Electoral Systems’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1):532.

Torsten Beck , George Clarke , Alberto Groff , Philip Keefer , and Patrick Walsh . 2001. ‘New Tools in Comparative Political Economy’. World Bank Economic Review 15(1):165176.

Nils-Christian Bormann , and Matt Golder . 2013. ‘Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946-2011’. Electoral Studies 32:360369.

A. Colin Cameron , and Pravin K. Trivedi . 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John M. Carey , and Mathew Soberg Shugart . 1995. ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas’. Electoral Studies 14(4):417439.

Eric C. C. Chang , Mark Andreas Kayser , Drew A. Linzer , and Ronald Rogowski . 2010. Electoral Systems and the Balance of Consumer-Producer Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ronald Deibert , John Palfrey , Rafal Rohozinski , and Jonathan Zittrain . 2011. Access Contested: Security, Identity, and Resistance in Asian Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

L DeNardis . 2009. Protocol Politics: The Globalization of Internet Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Laura DeNardis . 2012. ‘Hidden Levers of Internet Control’. Information, Communication and Society 15(5):720738.

Henry Farrell . 2006. ‘REGULATING INFORMATION FLOWS: States, Private Actors, and E-Commerce’. Annual Review of Political Science 9(1):353374.

John Gerring . 2012. ‘Mere Description’. British Journal of Political Science 42(4):721746.

Gene M. Grossman , and Elhanan Helpman . 2005. ‘A Protectionist Bias in Majoritarian Politics’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4):12391282.

Gary King , Jennifer Pan , and Margaret E. Roberts . 2013. ‘How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression’. American Political Science Review 107(2):326343.

Christopher T Marsden . 2011. Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance, and Legitimacy in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stephanie J Rickard . 2012. ‘Electoral Systems, Voters Interests and Geographic Dispersion’. British Journal of Political Science 42(4):855877.

Ronald Rogowski , and Mark Andreas Kayser . 2002. ‘Majoritarian Electoral Systems and Consumer Power: Price-Level Evidence from the OECD Countries’. American Journal of Political Science 46:526539.

Donald B Rubin . 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.

David Samuels . 2001. ‘Incumbents and Challengers on a Level Playing Field: Assessing the Impact of Campaign Finance in Brazil’. The Journal of Politics 63(2):569584.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Meserve and Pemstein supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (79 KB)
79 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Meserve and Pemstein Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 18
Total number of PDF views: 71 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 515 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 10th February 2017 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.