Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures*

  • Simon Hix and Abdul Noury
Abstract

This study uses roll-call voting data from 16 legislatures to investigate how the institutional context of politics—such as whether a country is a parliamentary or presidential regime, or has a single-party, coalition or minority government—shapes coalition formation and voting behavior in parliaments. It uses a geometric scaling metric to estimate the “revealed space” in each of these legislatures and a vote-by-vote statistical analysis to identify how much of this space can be explained by government-opposition dynamics as opposed to parties’ (left-right) policy positions. Government-opposition interests, rather than parties’ policy positions, are found to be the main drivers of voting behavior in most institutional contexts. In contrast, issue-by-issue coalition building along a single policy dimension is only found under certain restrictive institutional constraints: presidential regimes with coalition governments or parliamentary systems with minority governments. Put another way, voting in most legislatures is more like Westminster than Washington.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

London School of Economics and Political Science; New York University Abu Dhabi. We would like to thank Gary Cox, Brian Crisp, John Carey, Torun Dewan, John Huber, Amie Kreppel, Nolan McCarty, Slava Mikhaylov and seminar participants at LSE, Princeton, the University of Tokyo, and the European Political Science Association 2011 Conference for helpful comments. All the remaining errors are our own. We are also grateful to John Carey, Scott Desposato, Keith Poole, Yael Shomer, Elena Mielcova and the Voteworld project for sharing their data or making their data publicly available.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aldrich, John, Montgomery, Jacob, and Sparks, David. 2014. ‘Polarization and Ideology: Partisan Sources of Low Dimensionality in Scaled Roll Call Analyses’. Political Analysis 22:435456.
Andrews, Josephine T. 2002. When Majorities Fail: The Russian Parliament, 1990–1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baron, David, and Ferejohn, John. 1989. ‘Bargaining in Legislatures’. American Political Science Review 83:11811206.
Benedetto, Giacomo, and Hix, Simon. 2007. ‘The Rejected, the Dejected and the Ejected: Explaining Government Rebels in the 2001–2005 British House of Commons’. Comparative Political Studies 40:755781.
Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
Benoit, Kenneth, Laver, Michael, and Mikhaylov, Slava. 2009. ‘Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions’. American Journal of Political Science 53(2):495513.
Black, Duncan. 1948. ‘On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making’. Journal of Political Economy 56:2334.
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committee and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John M. 2007a. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting’. American Journal of Political Science 51:92107.
Carey, John M.. 2007b. ‘Carey Data Archive’. Available at http://www.dartmouth.edu/~jcarey.
Carey, John M.. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas’. Electoral Studies 14:417439.
Carroll, Raymond J., Ruppert, David, Stefanski, Leonard A., and Crainiceanu, Ciprian M.. 2006. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability Number 105, 2nd ed.Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Carroll, Royce, Lo, James, Lewis, Jeffrey, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009. ‘Comparing NOMINATE and IDEAL: Points of Difference and Monte Carlo Tests’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34:555591.
Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chiou, Fang-Yi. 2005. Jointly Estimating Party Effects and Ideologies. Princeton, NJ: Mimeo, Princeton University.
Clausen, Aage R., and Holmberg, Soren. 1977. ‘Legislative Voting Analysis in Disciplined Multi-Party Systems: The Swedish Case’. In William Adelotte (ed.), The History of Parliamentary Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Clinton, Joshua D. 2007. ‘Lawmaking and roll calls’. Journal of Politics 69:457469.
Clinton, Joshua, and Jackman, Simon. 2009. ‘To Simulate or to NOMINATE’? Legislative Studies Quarterly 34:593621.
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. ‘The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data’. American Political Science Review 98:355370.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2011. ‘Managing Plenary Time: The U.S. Congress in Comparative Context’. In Eric Schickler and Frances E. Lee (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cox, Gary W., Masuyama, Mikitaka, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2000. ‘Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives’. Japanese Journal of Political Science 1:122.
Dewan, Torun, and Spirling, Arthur. 2011. ‘Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies’. American Political Science Review 105:337358.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 1998. ‘Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure’. American Political Science Review 92:611621.
Döring, Herbert. 2001. ‘Parliamentary Agenda Control and Legislative Outcomes in Western Europe’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26:145165.
Ferrara, Federico. 2004. ‘Frogs, Mice, and Mixed Electoral Institutions’. Journal of Legislative Studies 10:122.
Figueiredo, Argelina, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. ‘Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil’. Comparative Politics 32:151170.
Hansen, Martin Ejnar. 2006a. ‘Explaining Parliamentary Dimensionality Through Institutions’? Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, IL, 20–23 April.
Hansen, Martin Ejnar. 2006b. ‘The Dimensionality of European Parliaments: Comparing Denmark, Norway and Ireland’. Paper presented at the IPSA World Congress. Fukuoka, 9–13 July.
Hix, Simon. 2004. ‘Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament’. World Politics 56:194223.
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gérard. 2006. ‘Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament’. American Journal of Political Science 50:494511.
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gérard. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hix, Simon, and Høyland, Bjørn. 2011. The Political System of the European Union 3rd ed.London: Palgrave.
Huber, John. 1996. ‘The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies’. American Political Science Review 90:269282.
Hug, Simon. 2010. ‘Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes’. British Journal of Political Science 40:225235.
Hug, Simon, and Schulz, Tobias. 2007. ‘Left-Right Positions of Political Parties Switzerland’. Party Politics 13:305330.
Jensen, Torben K. 2000. ‘Party Cohesion’. In Peter Esaiasson and Knut Heidar (eds), Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Jun, Hae-Won, and Hix, Simon. 2009. ‘Party Competition in the Parliamentary Arena: The Case of the Korean National Assembly’. Party Politics 15:667694.
Kam, Christopher J. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. ‘Where’s the Party’? British Journal of Political Science 23:235266.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Landi, Massimiliano, and Pelizzo, Riccardo. 2005. ‘A Spatial Analysis of the XIII Italian Legislature’. Working Paper Series No. 16-2005, Singapore Management University.
Lanfranchi, Prisca, and Lüthi, Ruth. 1999. ‘Cohesion of Party Groups and Interparty Conflict in the Swiss Parliament’. In Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell and Richard S. Katz (eds), Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State Press.
Laver, Michael. 2006. ‘Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context’. In Barry Weingast and Donald Wittman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Londregan, John B. 2000. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupia, Arthur, and Strøm, Kaare. 1995. ‘Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections’. American Political Science Review 89:648666.
Mattson, Ingvar, and Strøm, Kaare. 1995. ‘Parliamentary Committees’. In Herbert Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Mian, Atif, Sufi, Amir, and Trebbi, Francesco. 2012. ‘The Political Economy of the Subprime Mortgage Credit Expansion’. Working Paper Series No. 16107. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Müller, Wolfgang C., Philipp, Wilfried, and Jenny, Marcelo. 2001. ‘Die Rolle der parlamentarischen Fraktionen’. In Wolfgang Müller, Marcelo Jenny, Barbara Steininger, Martin Dolezal, Wilfried Philipp and Sabine Preisl-Westphal (eds), Die Österreichischen Abgeordneten: Individuelle Präferenzen und politisches Verhalten. Wein: Wien UV.
Myagkov, Mikhail G., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1996. ‘Czar Rule in the Russian Congress of People’s Deputies’? Legislative Studies Quarterly 21:340.
Noury, Abdul. 1999. Decision-Making in Transition: Voting Behavior in the Polish Parliament. Brussels: Mimeo, Free University.
Noury, Abdul, and Mielcova, Elena. 2005. ‘Electoral Performance and Voting Behavior in the Czech Republic’. Working Paper No. 2005-14, Institute of Government Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gerard. 2002. ‘European Parliament: Should it Have More Power?’. Economic Policy 17:279319.
Pajala, Antti, Jakulin, Aleks, and Buntine, Wray. 2005. Parliamentary Group and Individual Voting Behaviour in the Finnish Parliament in Year 2003. Turku, Finland: Mimeo, University of Turku.
Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rahat, Gideon. 2004. Party Cohesion in the Israeli Parliament 1949–2003. Jerusalem, Israel: Mimeo, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Rasch, Bjørn Erik. 1999. ‘Electoral Systems, Parliamentary Committees, and Party Discipline’. In Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell and Richard S. Katz (eds), Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State Press.
Rice, Stuart A. 1925. ‘The Behavior of Legislative Groups’. Political Science Quarterly 40:6072.
Romer, Thomas, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1978. ‘Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo’. Public Choice 33:2743.
Rosenthal, Howard, and Voeten, Erik. 2004. ‘Analyzing Roll Calls with Perfect Spatial Voting’. American Journal of Political Science 48:620632.
Saalfeld, Thomas. 1990. ‘The West German Bundestag After 40 Years’. West European Politics 13:6889.
Samuels, David J., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2003. ‘Ideology, Party and Interests in the British Parliament of 1841–47’. British Journal of Political Science 33:581605.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. ‘Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models’. American Journal of Political Science 23:2759.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1981. ‘Structure Induced Equilibrium in Legislative Choice’. Public Choice 37:509519.
Shomer, Yael. 2009. ‘Electoral Systems and Intra-Party Candidate Selection Effects on Legislators’ Behavior’. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association. Toronto, Canada, 3–6 September.
Skjaeveland, Asbjørn. 1999. ‘A Danish Party Cohesion Cycle’. Scandinavian Political Studies 22:121136.
Skjaeveland, Asbjørn. 2001. ‘Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament’. Journal of Legislative Studies 7:3556.
Spirling, Arthur, and McLean, Iain. 2007. ‘UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the U.K. House of Commons’. Political Analysis 15:8596.
Stjernquist, Nils, and Bjurulf, Bo. 1970. ‘Party Cohesion and Party Cooperation in the Swedish Parliament in 1964 and 1966’. Scandinavian Political Studies 5:129164.
Strøm, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strøm, Kaare, Muller, Wolfgang C., and Bergman, Torbjorn eds. 2011. Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsebelis, George. 1999. ‘Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis’. American Political Science Review 93:591608.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Benoit, Kenneth. 2007. Parties and Presidents in Latin America. Dataset. Dublin: Trinity College.
Zucco, Cesar, and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2011. ‘Distinguishing Between Influences on Brazilian Legislative Behavior’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36:363396.
Zucco, Cesar, and Power, Timothy. 2009. ‘Estimating Ideology of Brazilian Legislative Parties, 1990–2005’. Latin American Research Review 44:218246.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 245 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1200 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.