Skip to main content
×
×
Home

How to Survey About Electoral Turnout? The Efficacy of the Face-Saving Response Items in 19 Different Contexts*

Abstract

Researchers studying electoral participation often rely on post-election surveys. However, the reported turnout rate is usually much higher in survey samples than in reality. Survey methodology research has shown that offering abstainers the opportunity to use face-saving response options succeeds at reducing overreporting by a range of 4–8 percentage points. This finding rests on survey experiments conducted in the United States after national elections. We offer a test of the efficacy of the face-saving response items through a series of wording experiments embedded in 19 post-election surveys in Europe and Canada, at four different levels of government. With greater variation in contexts, our analyses reveal a distribution of effect sizes ranging from null to minus 18 percentage points.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Alexandre Morin-Chassé, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Political Science, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx, 3150, rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3T 1N8 (alexandre.morin.chasse@umontreal.ca). Damien Bol, Lecturer in Political Behavior, Department of Political Economy, King’s College London, Strand Building, London, United Kingdom, WC2R 2LS (damien.bol@kcl.ac.uk). Laura B. Stephenson, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, The University of Western Ontario, Social Science Centre Rm 4154, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C2 (laura.stephenson@uwo.ca). Simon Labbé St-Vincent, Research and Planning Analyst, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3T 1J4 (simon.labbe.st-vincent@umontreal.ca). To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.31

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Anderson BA, and Silver BD. 1986. ‘Measurements and Mismeasurement of the Validity of the Self-Reported Vote’. American Journal of Political Science 30(4):771785.
Ansolabehere S, and Hersh E. 2012. ‘Validation: What Big Data Reveal About Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate’. Political Analysis 20(4):437459.
Belli RF, Traugott MW, Young M, and McGonagle KA. 1999. ‘Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source Monitoring’. Public Opinion Quarterly 79(4):90108.
Belli RF, Moore SE, and VanHoewyk J. 2006. ‘An Experimental Comparison of Question Forms Used to Reduce Vote Overreporting’. Electoral Studies 25(4):751759.
Bernstein R, Chadha A, and Montjoy R. 2001. ‘Overreporting Voting: Why it Happens and Why it Matters’. Public Opinion Quarterly 65(1):2244.
Blais A. 2006. ‘What Affects Voter Turnout?’. Annual Review of Political Science 9:111125.
Burden BC. 2000. ‘Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies’. Political Analysis 8(4):389398.
Campbell DE. 2013. ‘Social Networks and Political Participation’. Annual Review of Political Science 16:3348.
Cox GW. 2015. ‘Electoral Rules, Mobilization, and Turnout’. Annual Review of Political Science 18:4968.
Duff B, Hanmer MJ, Park W-H, and White IK. 2007. ‘Good Excuses: Understanding Who Votes With an Improved Turnout Question’. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(1):6790.
Hanmer MJ, Banks AJ, and White IK. 2014. ‘Experiments to Reduce the Over-Reporting of Voting: A Pipeline to the Truth’. Political Analysis 22(1):130141.
Holbrook AL, and Krosnick JA. 2013. ‘A New Question Sequence to Measure Voter Turnout in Telephone Surveys. Results of an Experiment in the 2006 ANES Pilot Study’. Public Opinion Quarterly 77(S1):106123.
Greenwald AG, Carnot CG, Beach R, and Young B. 1987. ‘Increasing Voting Behavior by Asking People if They Expect to Vote’. Journal of Applied Psychology 72(2):315318.
Karp JA, and Brockington D. 2005. ‘Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries’. Journal of Politics 67(3):825840.
Martinez MD. 2003. ‘Comments on “Voter Turnout and National Election Study”’. Political Analysis 11(2):187192.
Näher A-F, and Krumpal I. 2012. ‘Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Forgiving Wording and Question Context on Social Desirability Bias’. Quality & Quantity 46(5):16011616.
Persson M, and Solevid M. 2014. ‘Measuring Political Participation—Testing Social Desirability Bias in a Web-Survey Experiment’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(1):98112.
Preisendörfer P, and Wolter F. 2014. ‘Who is Telling the Truth? A Validation Study on Determinants of Response Behavior in Surveys’. Public Opinion Quarterly 8(1):126146.
Selb P, and Munzert S. 2013. ‘Voter Overrepresentation, Vote Misreporting, and Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys’. Electoral Studies 32(1):186196.
Silver BD, Anderson BA, and Ambramson PR. 1986. ‘Who Overreports Voting?’. American Political Science Review 80(2):613624.
Smith JK, Gerber AS, and Orlich A. 2003. ‘Self‐Prophecy Effects and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Replication’. Political Psychology 24(3):593604.
Stocké V, and Stark T. 2007. ‘Political Involvement and Memory Failure as Interdependent Determinants of Vote Overreporting’. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21(2):239257.
Waismel-Manor I, and Sarid J. 2011. ‘Can Overreporting in Surveys be Reduced? Evidence from Israel’s Municipal Elections’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23(4):522529.
Zeglovits E, and Kritzinger S. 2014. ‘New Attempts to Reduce Overreporting of Voter Turnout and Their Effects’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(2):224234.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Morin-Chassé supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (333 KB)
333 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 137 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 622 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.