Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Identifying voter preferences for politicians’ personal attributes: a conjoint experiment in Japan

  • Yusaku Horiuchi (a1), Daniel M. Smith (a2) and Teppei Yamamoto (a3)
Abstract

Although politicians’ personal attributes are an important component of elections and representation, few studies have rigorously investigated which attributes are most relevant in shaping voters’ preferences for politicians, or whether these preferences vary across different electoral system contexts. We investigate these questions with a conjoint survey experiment using the case of Japan’s mixed-member bicameral system. We find that the attributes preferred by voters are not entirely consistent with the observed attributes of actual politicians. Moreover, voters’ preferences do not vary when asked to consider representation under different electoral system contexts, whereas the observed attributes of politicians do vary across these contexts. These findings point to the role of factors beyond voters’ sincere preferences, such as parties’ recruitment strategies, the effect of electoral rules on the salience of the personal vote, and the availability of different types of politicians, in determining the nature of representation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
References
Hide All
Aguilar, R, Cunow, S Desposato, S (2015) Choice Sets, Gender, and Candidate Choice in Brazil. Electoral Studies 39, 230242.
Anzia, SF Berry, CR (2011) The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen? American Journal of Political Science 55(3):478493.
Banducci, SA, Donovan, T Karp, JA (2004) Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation. The Journal of Politics 66(2):534556.
Bratton, KA Ray, LP (2002) Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science 46(2):428437.
Cain, BE, Ferejohn, JA Fiorina, MP (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Campbell, R Cowley, P (2014) What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment. Political Studies 62(4):745765.
Carey, JM Shugart, MS (1995) Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14, 417440.
Carnes, N Lupu, N (2016) Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class. American Political Science Review 110(4):832844.
Carozzi, F Repetto, L (2016) Sending the Pork Home: Birth Town Bias in Transfers to Italian Municipalities. Journal of Public Economics 134, 4252.
Carson, JL, Engstrom, EJ Roberts, JM (2007) Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress. American Political Science Review 101(2):289301.
Dolan, K (2010) The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates. Political Behavior 32(1):6988.
Fiva, JH Smith, DM (2017) Local Candidates and Voter Mobilization: Evidence from Historical Two-Round Elections in Norway. Electoral Studies 45, 130140.
Franchino, F Zucchini, F (2015) Voting in a Multi-Dimensional Space: A Conjoint Analysis Employing Valence and Ideology Attributes of Candidates. Political Science Research and Methods 3(2):221241.
Grofman, B (2005) Comparisons Among Electoral Systems: Distinguishing Between Localism and Candidate-Centered Politics. Electoral Studies 24(1):735740.
Hainmueller, J (2012) Entropy Balancing: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies. Political Analysis 20(1):2546.
Hainmueller, J, Hopkins, DJ Yamamoto, T (2014) Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multi-Dimensional Preferences Via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis 22(1):130.
Hainmueller, J, Hangartner, D Yamamoto, T (2015) Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments Against Real-World Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(8):23952400.
Hall, AB Snyder, JM Jr. (2015) How Much of the Incumbency Advantage is Due to Scare-Off?. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3):493514.
Hirano, S (2006) Electoral Institutions, Hometowns, and Favored Minorities: Evidence from Japan’s Electoral Reforms. World Politics 59(1):5182.
Horiuchi, Y, Smith, DM Yamamoto, T (2018) Measuring Voters’ Multidimensional Policy Preferences with Conjoint Analysis: Application to Japan’s 2014 Election. Political Analysis 26(2):190209.
Huddy, L Terkildsen, N (1993) Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37, 119147.
Iversen, T Rosenbluth, F (2010) Women, Work, and Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jacobson, GC (1989) Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-86. The American Political Science Review 83(3):773793.
Moser, RG Scheiner, E (2012) Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reed, SR, Scheiner, E Thies, MF (2012) The End of LDP Dominance and the Rise of Party-Oriented Politics in Japan. Journal of Japanese Studies 38(2):353376.
Rule, W Zimmerman, JF (eds) (1994) Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT and London: Greenwood Press.
Sanbonmatsu, K (2002) Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science 46(1):2034.
Scheiner, E (2006) Democracy Without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Shugart, MS (2001) Electoral “Efficiency” and the Move to Mixed-Member Systems. Electoral Studies 20(1):173193.
Shugart, MS, Valdini, ME Suominen, K (2005) Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators Under Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science 49(2):437449.
Smith, DM (2018) Dynasties and Democracy: The Inherited Incumbency Advantage in Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tavits, M (2010) Effect of Local Ties on Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behaviour the Case of Estonia. Party Politics 16(2):215235.
Thames, FC Williams, MS (2010) Incentives for Personal Votes and Women’s Representation in Legislatures. Comparative Political Studies 43(12):15751600.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Horiuchi et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Horiuchi et al. supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed