Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Media with reputational concerns: yes men or watchdogs?

  • Greg Chih-Hsin Sheen (a1)

Abstract

During the political process, the electorate needs to determine the competence of the government by both observing its policy decisions and acquiring information from the media. However, media reports are often criticized for not being independent and truthful. This paper discusses whether the public can determine the quality of a government from media reports. In other words, are media outlets more likely to act as watchdogs or just as “yes men” to the government? This paper argues that, because of reputational concerns, the media usually avoid criticizing the government. The media only report truthfully when the expected competence of the government is sufficiently low and the probability for the voter to learn from other information sources is sufficiently high. Otherwise, media outlets—especially low-quality outlets—will pander to the government in their reporting. Policy bias or media capture is not required for the yes-man problem to prevail.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail: C.Sheen@lse.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Althaus, SL, Edy, JA, Entman, RM and Phalen, P (1996) Revising the indexing hypothesis: officials, media, and the Libya crisis. Political Communication 13, 407421.
Amaral, R and Guimarães, C (1994) Media monopoly in Brazil. Journal of Communication 44, 2638.
Anderson, SP and McLaren, J (2012) Media mergers and media bias with rational consumers. Journal of the European Economic Association 10, 831859.
Ashworth, S and Shotts, KW (2010) Does informative media commentary reduce Politicians' incentives to pander? Journal of Public Economics 94, 838847.
Baron, D (2006) Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics 90, 136.
Battaglini, M (2002) Multiple referrals and multidimensional cheap talk. Econometrica 70, 13791401.
Bennett, WL (1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40, 103127.
Besley, T (2005) Political selection. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 4360.
Besley, T (2007) Principled Agents?: The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Besley, T and Prat, A (2006) Handcuffs for the grabbing hand?: media capture and Government accountability. American Economic Review 96, 720736.
Boydstun, AE (2013) Making the News: Politics, the Media, and Agenda Setting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bruns, C and Himmler, O (2016) Mass media, instrumental information, and electoral accountability. Journal of Public Economics 134, 7584.
Caillaud, B and Tirole, J (2002) Parties as political intermediaries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 14531489.
Chiang, C-F and Knight, B (2011) Media bias and influence: evidence from newspaper endorsements. The Review of Economic Studies 78, 795820.
Crawford, VP and Sobel, J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50, 14311451.
Eraslan, H and Özertürk, S (2017) Information gatekeeping and media bias. Rice University Working Paper. Available at http://he6.web.rice.edu/Papers/media2017-12-05.pdf
Gehlbach, S and Sonin, K (2014) Government control of the media. Journal of Public Economics 118, 163171.
Gentzkow, M and Shapiro, JM (2006) Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy 114, 280316.
Gentzkow, M and Shapiro, JM (2010) What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica 78, 3571.
Hallin, DC (1986) The “Uncensored War”: The Media and Vietnam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kartik, N and Van Weelden, R (2019) Informative cheap talk in elections. The Review of Economic Studies 86, 755784.
Krishna, V and Morgan, J (2001) A model on expertise. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 747775.
Larcinese, V, Puglisi, R and Snyder, JM Jr. (2011) Partisan bias in economic news: evidence on the agenda-setting behavior of U.S. newspapers. Journal of Public Economics 95, 11781189.
Laver, M, Benoit, K and Garry, J (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review 97, 311331.
Morris, S (2001) Political correctness. Journal of Political Economy 109, 231265.
Norris, P (2014) Watchdog journalism. In Bovens, M, Goodin, RE and Schillemans, T (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 525544.
Ottaviani, M and Sørensen, PN (2006) Reputational cheap talk. RAND Journal of Economics 37, 155175.
Prendergast, C (1993) A theory of “yes men”. American Economic Review 83, 757770.
Shapiro, JM (2016) Special interests and the media: theory and an application to climate change. Journal of Public Economics 144, 91108.
Sunstein, CR (2017) #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wolton, S (2019) Are biased media bad for democracy? American Journal of Political Science 63, 548562.
Zaller, J and Chiu, D (1996) Government's little helper: U.S. Press coverage of foreign policy crises, 1945–1991. Political Communication 13, 385405.

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Sheen Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Sheen supplementary material
Sheen supplementary material

 Unknown (13 KB)
13 KB

Media with reputational concerns: yes men or watchdogs?

  • Greg Chih-Hsin Sheen (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed