Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Propaganda to persuade

  • Tinghua Yu (a1)

Abstract

I analyze a model in which an incumbent ruler designs a rule for propaganda disclosure that reveals information about her competence to her allies and opponents. A message that increases beliefs about the incumbent's competence is considered as propaganda. I show that for propaganda to be persuasive, it must be limited in frequency. I also demonstrate how various features of the environment affect the frequency of propaganda. Propaganda increases in frequency as the incumbent's allies become more dependent on her and as her opponents become weaker. Further, there is a non-monotonic relationship between the strength of the conflict of interest between both her allies and her opponents and the frequency of propaganda. As conflict increases, the frequency of propaganda decreases up to a threshold beyond which increased conflict is associated with more frequent propaganda.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: t.yu5@lse.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Adena, M, Enikolopov, R, Petrova, M, Santarosa, V and Zhuravskaya, E (2015) Radio and the rise of the nazis in prewar Germany. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130, 18851939.
Alonso, R and Câmara, O (2016) Persuading voters. American Economic Review 106, 35903605.
Besley, TJ and Kudamatsu, M (2007) Making autocracy work.
Cantoni, D, Chen, Y, Yang, DY, Yuchtman, N and Zhang, YJ (2017) Curriculum and ideology. Journal of Political Economy 125, 338392.
De Mesquita, BB, Smith, A, Morrow, JD and Siverson, RM (2005) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.
Egorov, G, Guriev, S and Sonin, K (2009) Why resource-poor dictators allow freer media: a theory and evidence from panel data. American Political Science Review 103, 645668.
Gandhi, J (2008) Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Geddes, B (1999) What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 2, 115144.
Gehlbach, S and Keefer, P (2012) Private investment and the institutionalization of collective action in autocracies: ruling parties and legislatures. The Journal of Politics 74, 621635.
Gehlbach, S and Sonin, K (2014) Government control of the media. Journal of Public Economics 118, 163171.
Gentzkow, M and Shapiro, JM (2006) Media bias and reputation. Journal of political Economy 114, 280316.
Gibbs, J (1999) Gorbachev's Glasnost: The Soviet Media in the First Phase of Perestroika, vol. 9, College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press.
Guriev, S and Treisman, D (2015) How modern dictators survive: an informational theory of the new authoritarianism.
Hollyer, JR, Rosendorff, BP and Vreeland, JR (2015) Transparency, protest, and autocratic instability. American Political Science Review 109, 764784.
Huang, H (2015) Propaganda as signaling. Comparative Politics 47, 419444.
i Miquel, GP (2007) The control of politicians in divided societies: the politics of fear. The Review of Economic Studies 74, 12591274.
Kamenica, E and Gentzkow, M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. The American Economic Review 101, 25902615.
King, G, Pan, J and Roberts, ME (2013) How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review 107, 326343.
Little, A (2017) Propaganda and credulity. Games and Economic Behavior 102, 224232.
Lorentzen, P (2014) China's strategic censorship. American Journal of Political Science 58, 402414.
Luo, Z and Rozenas, A (2016) Ruling the ruling coalition: information control and autocratic governance.
Mullainathan, S and Shleifer, A (2005) The market for news. American Economic Review 95, 10311053.
Myerson, RB (2008) The autocrat's credibility problem and foundations of the constitutional state. American Political Science Review 102, 125139.
Shadmehr, M and Bernhardt, D (2015) State censorship. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 7, 280307.
Svolik, MW (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Yanagizawa-Drott, D (2014) Propaganda and conflict: evidence from the Rwandan genocide. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, 19471994.

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Yu supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (217 KB)
217 KB

Propaganda to persuade

  • Tinghua Yu (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed