Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Regular Voters, Marginal Voters and the Electoral Effects of Turnout

  • Anthony Fowler
Abstract

How do marginal voters differ from regular voters? This article develops a method for comparing the partisan preferences of regular voters to those marginal voters whose turnout decisions are influenced by exogenous factors and applies it to two sources of variation in turnout in the United States—weather and election timing. In both cases, marginal voters are over 20 percentage points more supportive of the Democratic Party than regular voters—a significant divide. The findings suggest that the expansion or contraction of the electorate can have important consequences. Moreover, the findings suggest that election results do not always reflect the preferences of the citizenry, because the marginal citizens who may stay home have systematically different preferences than those who participate. Finally, the methods developed in the article may enable future researchers to compare regular and marginal voters on many different dimensions and in many different electoral settings.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

Anthony Fowler is an Assistant Professor in the Harris School of Public Policy Studies at the University of Chicago, 1155 East 60th St., Room 165, Chicago, IL 60637 (anthony.fowler@uchicago.edu). Thanks to Jim Alt, Steve Ansolabehere, Dan Carpenter, Gloria Chao, Ryan Enos, Bernard Fraga, Andy Hall, Eitan Hersh, Gabe Lenz, Michael Martinez and Jim Snyder for helpful comments.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Angrist, Joshua, and Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Hersh, Eitan. 2011. ‘Who Really Votes?’ In Facing the Challenge of Democracy: Explorations in the Analysis of Public Opinion and Political Participation, edited by Paul M. Sniderman and Benjamin Highton, 267291. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Anzia, Sarah. 2011. ‘Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups’. Journal of Politics 73(2):412427.
Anzia, Sarah. 2012. ‘The Election Timing Effect: Evidence from a Policy Intervention in Texas’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7(3):209248.
Berinsky, Adam. 2005. ‘The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States’. American Politics Research 33(4):471491.
Bernhagen, Patrick, and Marsh, Michael. 2007. ‘The Partisan Effects of Low Turnout: Analyzing Vote Absention as a Missing Data Problem’. Electoral Studies 26(3):548560.
Berry, Christopher R., and Gersen, Jacob E.. 2011. ‘Election Timing and Public Policy’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6(2):103135.
Citrin, Jack, Schickler, Eric, and Sides, John. 2003. ‘What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections’. American Journal of Political Science 47(1):7590.
DeNardo, James. 1980. ‘Turnout and the Vote: The Joke’s on the Democrats’. American Political Science Review 80:12911304.
Enos, Ryan, Fowler, Anthony, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2014. ‘Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the Electorate’. Journal of Politics 76(1):273288.
Erikson, Robert. 1995. ‘State Turnout and Presidential Voting: A Closer Look’. American Politics Quarterly 23:387396.
Fisher, Stephen D. 2007. ‘(Change in) Turnout and (Change in) the Left Share of the Vote’. Electoral Studies 26(3):598611.
Fowler, Anthony. 2013. ‘Electoral and Policy Consequences of Voter Turnout: Evidence from Compulsory Voting in Australia’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8(2):159182.
Fraga, Bernard, and Hersh, Eitan. 2011. ‘Voting Costs and Voter Turnout in Competitive Elections’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5(4):339356.
Gomez, Brad, Hansford, Thomas, and Krause, George. 2007. ‘The Republicans Should Pray for Rain: Weather, Turnout, and Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections’. Journal of Politics 69:649663.
Grofman, Bernard, Own, Guillermo, and Collet, Christian. 1999. ‘Rethinking the Partisan Effects of Higher Turnout: So What’s the Question?Public Choice 99:357376.
Hansford, Thomas, and Gomez, Brad. 2010. ‘Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout’. American Political Science Review 104(2):268288.
Highton, Benjamin, and Wolfinger, Raymond. 2001. ‘The Political Implications of Higher Turnout’. British Journal of Political Science 31:179223.
Hill, Seth. 2010. Changing Composition and Changing Allegiance in American Politics. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Herron, Michael. 1998. ‘The Presidential Election of 1988: Low Voter Turnout and the Defeat of Michael Dukakis’. Working Paper.
Knack, Stephen, and White, James. 1998. ‘Did States’ Motor Voter Programs Help the Democrats?American Politics Research 26(3):344365.
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. ‘Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma’. American Political Science Review 91(1):114.
Mackerras, Malcolm, and McAllister, Ian. 1999. ‘Compulsory Voting, Party Stability and Electoral Advantage in Australia’. Electoral Studies 18(2):217233.
Martinez, Michael, and Gill, Jeff. 2005. ‘The Effects of Turnout on Partisan Outcomes in U.S. Presidential Elections 1960–2000’. Journal of Politics 67(4):12481274.
Martinez, Michael, and Hill, David. 2007. ‘Was the Joke on the Democrats Again? Turnout and Partisan Choice in the 2004 U.S. Election’. American Review of Politics 28:8195.
McAllister, Ian, and Mughan, Anthony. 1986. ‘Differential Party Advantage in British General Elections, 1964–83’. Electoral Studies 5(2):143152.
McDonald, Michael, and Popkin, Samuel. 2001. ‘The Myth of the Vanishing Voter’. American Political Science Review 95(4):963974.
McFadden, Daniel. 1974. ‘Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior’. In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, 105142. New York: Academic Press.
Nagel, Jack H. 1988. ‘Voter Turnout in New Zealand General Elections, 1928–1988’. Political Science 40:1638.
Nagel, Jack H., and McNulty, John E.. 1996. ‘Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections’. American Political Science Review 90(4):780793.
Pacek, Alexander, and Radcliff, Benjamin. 1995. ‘Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Centre Parties: A Cross-National Analysis’. British Journal of Political Science 25(1):137143.
Pettersen, Per Arnt, and Rose, Lawrence E.. 2007. ‘The Dog that Didn’t Bark: Would Increased Electoral Turnout Make a Difference?Electoral Studies 26(3):574588.
Radcliff, Benjamin. 1994. ‘Turnout and the Democratic Vote’. American Politics Quarterly 9:259276.
Rogers, Todd, and Aida, Masahiko. 2013. ‘Vote Self-Prediction Hardly Predicts Who Will Vote, and Is (Misleadingly) Unbiased’. American Politics Research 42(3):503528.
Rubenson, Daniel, Blais, Andre, Fournier, Patrick, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil. 2007. ‘Does Low Turnout Matter? Evidence from the 2000 Canadian Federal Election’. Electoral Studies 26(3):589597.
Sled, Sarah. 2008. It’s In the Mail: The Effect of Vote By Mail Balloting on Voter Turnout and Policy Outcomes in U.S. Elections. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Stein, Robert. 1998. ‘Early Voting’. Public Opinion Quarterly 62(1):5769.
van der Eijk, Cees, and van Egmond, Marcel. 2007. ‘Political Effects of Low Turnout in National and European Elections’. Electoral Studies 26(3):561573.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wolfinger, Raymond, and Rosenstone, Steven. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed