Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A Law on Paper Only: Electoral Rules, Parties, and the Persistent Underrepresentation of Women in Brazilian Legislatures

  • Kristin Wylie (a1) and Pedro dos Santos (a2)
Abstract

This article advances a party-centric analysis of gender quotas in Brazil. We examine how parties mediate electoral rules, finding that neither the implementation of the Lei de Cotas (Quota Law) in 1995 nor its 2009 mini-reform was sufficient to induce significant change in party strategies for the nomination and election of women. Moreover, we find that while the open-list proportional representation electoral system is an important part of the explanation for the quota's failure to enhance women's representation, an analysis of how those electoral rules interact with decentralized party politics and women's absence from subnational party leadership structures yields superior explanatory power for understanding quota (non)compliance. We marshal extensive evidence on interparty variation in candidacies to Brazil's Chamber of Deputies and state legislative assemblies and interviews with candidates, party leaders, bureaucrats, and activists throughout Brazil to show how electoral rules and party dynamics interact to undermine the gender quota, resulting in a limited increase in the number of female candidates and stagnation in the number of women elected. We conclude that reform efforts must target not only electoral rules but also the subnational party structures that mediate these rules if they are to enhance women's political representation.

This article advances a party-centric analysis of gender quotas in Brazil. We examine how parties mediate electoral rules, finding that neither the implementation of the Lei de Cotas (Quota Law) in 1995 nor its 2009 mini-reform was sufficient to induce significant change in party strategies for the nomination and election of women. Moreover, we find that while the open-list proportional representation electoral system is an important part of the explanation for the quota's failure to enhance women's representation, an analysis of how those electoral rules interact with decentralized party politics and women's absence from subnational party leadership structures yields superior explanatory power for understanding quota (non)compliance. We marshal extensive evidence on interparty variation in candidacies to Brazil's Chamber of Deputies and state legislative assemblies and interviews with candidates, party leaders, bureaucrats, and activists throughout Brazil to show how electoral rules and party dynamics interact to undermine the gender quota, resulting in a limited increase in the number of female candidates and stagnation in the number of women elected. We conclude that reform efforts must target not only electoral rules but also the subnational party structures that mediate these rules if they are to enhance women's political representation.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Joan Acker . 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4 (2): 139–58.

Joan Acker . 1992. “From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology 21 (5): 565–69.

Clara Araújo . 2010. “The Limits of Women's Quotas in Brazil.” IDS Bulletin 41 (5): 1724.

Elin Bjarnegård . 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Maria do Socorro Sousa Braga . 2008. “Organizações Partidárias E Seleção de Candidatos No Estado de São Paulo.” Opinião Pública 14 (2): 454–85.

John M. Carey , and Matthew Soberg Shugart . 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39.

Louise Chappell . 2006. “Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered.” Politics & Gender 2 (2): 223–35.

Susan Franceschet , Mona Lena Krook , and Jennifer M. Piscopo , eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press.

Susan Franceschet , and Jennifer Piscopo . 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393425.

Mala Htun , and Mark Jones . 2002. “Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women's Leadership in Latin America.” In Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, eds. Nikki Craske and Maxine Molyneux . Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 3256.

Sally J. Kenney 1996. “New Research on Gendered Political Institutions.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (2): 445–66.

Meryl Kenny . 2013. Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mona Lena Krook . 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mona Lena Krook , and Fiona Mackay , eds. 2011. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Scott Mainwaring . 1991. “Politicians, Parties, and Electoral Systems: Brazil in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics 24 (1): 2143.

Richard E. Matland 1998. “Women's Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (1): 109–25.

Luis Felipe Miguel , and Cristina Monteiro de Queiroz . 2006. “Regional Differences and Women's Relative Success in Municipal Elections in Brazil.” Revista Estudos Feministas 14 (2): 363–85.

Timothy J. Power , and Cesar Zucco Jr. 2009. “Estimating Ideology of Brazilian Legislative Parties, 1990–2005: A Research Communication.” Latin American Research Review 44 (1): 218–46.

Patricia Rangel . 2009. “Sex and the City: Reflections on Women's Parliamentary Representation and the 2008 Municipal Elections.” Sociedade e Cultura 12 (1): 6977.

Rob Salmond . 2006. “Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (2): 175204.

David Samuels . 2000. “Ambition and Competition: Explaining Legislative Turnover in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (3): 481–97.

David Samuels . 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gregory D. Schmidt 2009. “The Election of Women in List PR Systems: Testing the Conventional Wisdom.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 190203.

Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 528.

Matthew Streb , Barbara Burrell , Brian Frederick , and Michael Genovese . 2008. “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1): 7689.

Frank C. Thames , and Margaret S. Williams . 2010. “Incentives for Personal Votes and Women's Representation in Legislatures.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 15751600.

Aili Mari Tripp , and Alice Kang . 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 338–61.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Wylie and dos Santos supplementary material
Abstract

 Word (14 KB)
14 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 97 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 307 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.