Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-gsnzm Total loading time: 0.305 Render date: 2022-10-04T07:39:23.450Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Politics and the Role of the Electoral Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2019

Luciana de Oliveira Ramos
Affiliation:
São Paulo Law School of Fundação Getulio Vargas
Virgílio Afonso da Silva
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo

Abstract

Like many other countries, Brazil has adopted gender quotas in elections for legislatures at all levels of the federation. However, Brazilian gender quotas have been ineffective at increasing women's participation in politics. Authors usually point to reasons related to the electoral system and party structure. This article analyzes a variable that is rarely considered: the role of the Electoral Court. We argue that the quality and intensity of the control exercised by an electoral court, when called upon to decide on the enforcement of the gender quota law, can influence the efficacy of this policy. We show that, in general, the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court tends to foster the participation of women in politics. However, based on two divides—between easy and difficult cases and between cases with low and high impact—we argue that in the realm of gender quotas, this court takes a rather restrained stance in those cases considered both difficult and with high impact.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Early drafts of this article were presented and discussed at a seminar of the research cluster Constitution, Politics & Institutions (University of São Paulo, Brazil); at the seminar Resisting Women's Political Leadership: Theories, Data, Solutions (Rutgers University); at the research workshop of the FGV Direito São Paulo (Getulio Vargas Foundation, Brazil); and at the XIII Congreso Iberoamericano de Derecho Constitucional (UNAM, Mexico). We would like to thank the organizers for having invited us and all the participants for their valuable comments, as well as friends and colleagues that read the drafts in different occasions, especially Mona Lena Krook, Marta Rodriguez Machado, Vitor Marchetti, Rafael Mafei, Jennifer Piscopo, Diogo Rais, Ligia Pinto Sica, Adriane Sanctis, Guilherme Klafke, Livia Gil Guimarães, Isadora Almeida, Carolina Marinho, and Artur Péricles Monteiro.

References

REFERENCES

Alvarez, Sonia E. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Araújo, Clara, and Alves, José Eustáquio Diniz. 2007. “Impactos de Indicadores Sociais e do Sistema Eleitoral Sobre as Chances das Mulheres nas Eleições e suas Interações com as Cotas” [Impacts of social indicators and electoral system on women's chances in elections and their interactions with gender quotas]. Dados 50 (3): 535–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archenti, Nélida. 2014. “El Proceso Hacia la Paridad en América Latina: Argentina y Costa Rica, Experiencias Comparadas” [The process toward parity in Latin America: Argentina and Costa Rica, comparative experiences]. Revista Digital de Derecho Electoral 17: 304–32.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2006. “The Pros and Cons of Gender Quota Laws: What Happens When You Kick Men Out and Let Women In?Politics & Gender 2 (1): 102–9.Google Scholar
Bohn, Simone Rodrigues da Silva, Fleischer, David, and Whitaker, Francisco. 2002. “A Fiscalização das Eleições” [Elections oversight]. In Caminhos da Transparência [Pathways to transparency], ed. Speck, Bruno Wilhelm. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 335–54.Google Scholar
Cadah, Lucas. 2014. “A Estrutura da Justiça Eleitoral Brasileira” [The structure of Brazilian Electoral Justice]. Cadernos Adenauer 15 (1): 2744.Google Scholar
Caminotti, Mariana, and Freidenberg, Flavia Daniela. 2016. “Federalismo electoral, fortaleza de las cuotas de género y representación política de las mujeres en los ámbitos subnacionales en Argentina y México” [Electoral federalism, strength of gender quotas, and political representation of women in subnational assemblies in Argentina and Mexico].” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 61 (228): 121–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dantas, Humberto, Oliveira, Samuel A., and Sousa, Marcelo. 2014. “Formação Acadêmica e Direito Eleitoral” [Academic training and electoral law]. Cadernos Adenauer 15 (1): 4562.Google Scholar
Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2006. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Lander 1990–2000.” Party Politics 12 (2): 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, David M. 1996. Comparing Electoral Systems. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M., eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Górecki, Maciej A., and Kukołowicz, Paula. 2014. “Gender Quotas, Candidate Background and the Election of Women: A Paradox of Gender Quotas in Open-List Proportional Representation Systems.” Electoral Studies 36: 6580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Tricia. 2003. “Electoral Gender Quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 22 (1): 5278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Tricia. 2017. “Making Gender Quota Mechanics Work: A Paired Comparison of Brazil and Peru.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 19 (3): 357–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2002. “Puzzles of Women's Rights in Brazil.” Social Research 69 (3): 733–51.Google Scholar
Jalalzai, Farida, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. “Beyond Hillary and Benazir: Women's Political Leadership Worldwide.” International Political Science Review 31 (1): 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2004. “Quota Legislation and the Election of Women: Learning from the Costa Rican Experience.” Journal of Politics 66 (4): 1203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006a. “Gender Quotas, Norms, and Politics.” Politics & Gender 2 (1): 110–18.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006b. “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide.” Politics & Gender 2 (3): 303–27.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Childs, Sarah, eds. 2010. Women, Gender, and Politics: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice E. 2002. “Can Parties Police Themselves? Electoral Governance and Democratization.” International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique 23 (1): 2946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, Vitor. 2008. “Governança Eleitoral: O Modelo Brasileiro de Justiça Eleitoral” [Electoral governance: The Brazilian model of electoral justice]. Dados 51 (4): 865–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, Vitor. 2012. “Electoral Governance in Brazil.” Brazilian Political Science Review 6 (1): 113–33.Google Scholar
Miguel, Luis F. 2008. “Political Representation and Gender in Brazil: Quotas for Women and Their Impact.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 27 (2): 197214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozaffar, Shaheen, and Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Comparative Study of Electoral Governance—Introduction.” International Political Science Review 23 (1): 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2015. “States as Gender Equality Activists: The Evolution of Quota Laws in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 57 (3): 2749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2016. “Democracy as Gender Balance: The Shift from Quotas to Parity in Latin America.” Politics, Groups and Identities 4 (2): 214–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Gregory D. 2009. “The Election of Women in List PR Systems: Testing the Conventional Wisdom.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 190203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Verge, Tània. 2012. “Institutionalising Gender Equality in Spain: From Party Quotas to Electoral Gender Quotas.” West European Politics 35 (2): 395414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Kristin N. 2018. Party Institutionalization and Women's Representation in Democratic Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Kristin N., and dos Santos, Pedro. 2016. “A Law on Paper Only: Electoral Rules, Parties, and the Persistent Underrepresentation of Women in Brazilian Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 12 (3): 415–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora Chavarria, Eugenia María. 2009. “Derechos Políticos de La Mujer en Costa Rica: 1986–2006” [Political rights of women in Costa Rica: 1986–2006].” Revista de Derecho Electoral 7: 144.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Politics and the Role of the Electoral Court
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Politics and the Role of the Electoral Court
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Politics and the Role of the Electoral Court
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *