Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-pvfbt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-03T05:41:21.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Missing Fingerprints: U.S. Women Legislators and International Development Aid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2022

Katelyn E. Stauffer Open the ORCID record for Katelyn E. Stauffer [Opens in a new window] ,
Yoshiharu Kobayashi Open the ORCID record for Yoshiharu Kobayashi [Opens in a new window] ,
Kelsey M. Martin-Morales Open the ORCID record for Kelsey M. Martin-Morales [Opens in a new window] ,
Riley Lankes ,
Tobias Heinrich Open the ORCID record for Tobias Heinrich [Opens in a new window]  and
Catherine R. Goodwin
Katelyn E. Stauffer*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
Yoshiharu Kobayashi
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Kelsey M. Martin-Morales
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
Riley Lankes
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Tobias Heinrich
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
Catherine R. Goodwin
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: kstauffer@sc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is optimism that the growing number of women in political office will reorient the focus of international politics toward more social and humanitarian issues. One basis for this optimism is the argument that women legislators hold distinct foreign policy preferences and act on them to affect changes in policy. However, we know little about gender differences in the behavior of individual legislators on these issues. This study investigates the behavior of individual legislators of the United States, one of the most important actors in international politics, in the context of development aid. Analyzing a diverse set of legislative behaviors in the U.S. Congress, we find no evidence that women legislators behave any differently than men with regard to these issues. Beyond its contribution to our understanding of the making and future of American foreign policy, this study contributes to broader debates about women’s representation and foreign policy.

Keywords

genderlegislative behaviorforeign policyforeign aidUnited States

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 585 - 610
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adler, E. Scott. 2003. “Congressional District Data File.” University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John D.. 2013. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, James, and Vesterlund, Lise. 2001. “Which Is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1): 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angevine, Sara. 2017. “Representing All Women: An Analysis of Congress, Foreign Policy, and the Boundaries of Women’s Surrogate Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (1): 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arel-Bundock, Vincent, Atkinson, James, and Potter, Rachel Augustine. 2015. “The Limits of Foreign Aid Diplomacy: How Bureaucratic Design Shapes Aid Distribution.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (3): 544–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 2014. “Numerical and Policy Representation on the International Stage: Women Foreign Policy Leaders in Western Industrialised Systems.” International Political Science Review 35 (4): 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 2018. Women as Foreign Policy Leaders: National Security and Gender Politics in Superpower America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020. “A Feminine Advantage? Delineating the Effects of Feminine Trait and Feminine Issue Messages on Evaluations of Female Candidates.” Politics & Gender 16 (3): 660–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauhr, Monika, Charron, Nicholas, and Nasiritousi, Naghmeh. 2013. “Does Corruption Cause Aid Fatigue? Public Opinion and the Aid-Corruption Paradox.” International Studies Quarterly 57 (3): 568–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, William, and Jeong, Gyung-Ho. 2020. “Gender and Foreign Policy: Are Female Members of Congress More Dovish than Their Male Colleagues?” Political Research Quarterly 73 (1): 126–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Timm, Fortunato, David, and O’Brien, Diana Z.. 2021. “Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination.” American Political Science Review 115 (1): 307–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisbee, James. 2019. “Barp: Improving Mister P Using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.” American Political Science Review 113 (4): 1060–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuning, Marijke. 2001. “Women’s Representation and Development Assistance: A Cross-national Study.” Women & Politics 23 (3): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysk, Alison, and Mehta, Aashish. 2014. “Do Rights at Home Boost Rights Abroad? Sexual Equality and Humanitarian Foreign Policy.” Journal of Peace Research 51 (1): 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary. 2000. “Gendered Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 37 (1): 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary, and Boyer, Mark A.. 2001. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (4): 503–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, Devin, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2015. “Dynamic Estimation of Latent Opinion Using a Hierarchical Group-Level IRT Model.” Political Analysis 23 (2): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, Devin, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2016. “The Dynamics of State Policy Liberalism, 1936–2014.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 899–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen. 2006. “Substantive Representation of Women and the Impact of Descriptive Representation—Case: The Belgian Lower House 1900–1979.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (2): 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah and Lena Krook, Mona. 2008. “Critical Mass Theory and Women’s Representation.” Political Studies. 56: 725–736.Google Scholar
Chong, Alberto, and Gradstein, Mark. 2008. “What Determines Foreign Aid? The Donors’ Perspective.” Journal of Development Economics 87 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, and Zetterberg, Pär. 2018. “Quota Shocks: Electoral Gender Quotas and Government Spending Priorities Worldwide.” Journal of Politics 80 (3): 916–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2004. “When Tokens Matter.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (1): 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Bryce J., Hayes, Matthew, and O’Brien, Diana Z.. 2019. “Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech on Women.” American Political Science Review 113 (4): 941–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Simone, and Wright, Joseph. 2014. “Foreign Aid Allocation Tactics and Democratic Change in Africa.” Journal of Politics 77 (1): 216–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, Axel, Gehring, Kai, and Klasen, Stephan. 2015. “Gesture Politics or Real Commitment? Gender Inequality and the Allocation of Aid.” World Development 70: 464–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufwenberg, Martin, and Muren, Astri. 2006. “Generosity, Anonymity, Gender.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61 (1): 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Karau, Steven J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109 (3): 573–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckel, Catherine C., and Grossman, Philip J.. 1998. “Are Women Less Selfish than Men? Evidence from Dictator Experiments.” Economic Journal 108 (448): 726–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard C. 2016. “Gender Difference in American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force, 1982–2013.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (1): 138–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Christoph. 2011. “Dictator Games: A Meta Study.” Experimental Economics 14 (4): 583–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H. 2006a. “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks.” Political Analysis 14 (4): 456–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H. 2006b. “Legislative Cosponsorship Networks in the US House and Senate.” Social Networks 28 (4): 454–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393–425.Google Scholar
Frankovic, Kathleen A. 1977. “Sex and Voting in the US House of Representatives 1961–1975.” American Politics Quarterly 5 (3): 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, Brian. 2009. “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Congress and the Presidency 36 (1): 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, Brian. 2015. “A Longitudinal Test of the Gender Turnover Model among US House and Senate Members.” Social Science Journal 52 (2): 102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Andreas, Dreher, Axel, and Nunnenkamp, Peter. 2014. “Determinants of Donor Generosity: A Survey of the Aid Budget Literature.” World Development 56: 172–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Andreas, and Richert, Katharina. 2018. “Development Minister Characteristics and Aid Giving.” European Journal of Political Economy 53: 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M., and Miller, Steven V.. 2012. “Comparing the Foreign Aid Policies of Presidents Bush and Obama.” Social Science Quarterly 93 (5): 1202–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Dee. 2019. “Entering the Men’s Domain? Gender and Portfolio Allocation in European Governments.” European Journal of Political Research 58 (2): 631–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Markus P., and Moss, Todd J.. 2005. “Compassionate Conservatives or Conservative Compassionates? US Political Parties and Bilateral Foreign Assistance to Africa.” Journal of Development Studies 41 (7): 1288–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens. 2012. “Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Tobias, and Kobayashi, Yoshiharu. 2022. “Evaluating Explanations for Selectivity in Foreign Aid.” Kyklos 75 (1): 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Tobias, Kobayashi, Yoshiharu, and Bryant, Kristin A.. 2016. “Public Opinion and Foreign Aid Cuts in Economic Crises.” World Development 77: 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Tobias, Kobayashi, Yoshiharu, and Lawson, Edward Jr. 2021. “Populism and Foreign Aid.” European Journal of International Relations 27 (4): 1042–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Daniel L., Hicks, Joan Hamory, and Maldonado, Beatriz. 2016. “Women as Policy Makers and Donors: Female Legislators and Foreign Aid.” European Journal of Political Economy 41: 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., and Rosenau, James N.. 1981. “The Foreign Policy Beliefs of Women in Leadership Positions.” Journal of Politics 43 (2): 326–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honaker, James, and King, Gary. 2010. “What to Do about Missing Values in Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 561–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imamverdiyeva, Ulkar, Pinto, Pablo M., and Shea, Patrick E.. 2021. “A Re-examination of Gender, Descriptive Representation, and Trade Policy.” http://www.pablopinto.com/wp-content/uploads/womentrade_040821.pdf (accessed August 21, 2022).Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2000. “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Mendelberg, Tali, and Shaker, Lee. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 533–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1995. “Alternative Views of Crime: Legislative Policymaking in Gendered Terms.” Journal of Politics 57 (3): 696–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleemann, Linda, Nunnenkamp, Peter, and Thiele, Rainer. 2016. “Gender Inequality, Female Leadership, and Aid Allocation: A Panel Analysis of Aid for Education.” Journal of International Development 28 (3): 376–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. 1997. “Candidate Gender and Women’s Psychological Engagement in Politics.” American Politics Research 25 (1): 118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Michael T., and Fulton, Sarah A.. 2011. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies.” Journal of Politics 73 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizotte, Mary-Kate, Eichenberg, Richard C., and Stoll, Richard J.. 2020. “Citizen Support for the Pursuit of Gender Equality in US Foreign Policy.” Journal of Human Rights 19 (3): 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowande, Kenneth. 2018. “Who Polices the Administrative State?” American Political Science Review 112 (4): 874–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowande, Kenneth, Ritchie, Melinda, and Lauterbach, Erinn. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (3): 644–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Kelan, and Breuning, Marijke. 2014. “Gender and Generosity: Does Women’s Representation Affect Development Cooperation?” Politics, Groups, and Identities 2 (3): 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundsgaarde, Erik, Breunig, Christian, and Prakash, Aseem. 2007. “Trade versus Aid: Donor Generosity in an Era of Globalization.” Policy Sciences 40 (2): 157–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttmer, Erzo F. P., and Singhal, Monica. 2011. “Culture, Context, and the Taste for Redistribution.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3 (1): 157–79.Google Scholar
Mavisakalyan, Astghik, and Tarverdi, Yashar. 2019. “Gender and Climate Change: Do Female Parliamentarians Make Difference?” European Journal of Political Economy 56: 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlen, Nancy E., and Sarkees, Meredith Reid. 1993. Women in Foreign Policy: The Insiders. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mills, Russell W., and Kalaf-Hughes, Nicole. 2015. “The Evolution of Distributive Benefits: The Rise of Letter-Marking in the United States Congress.” Journal of Economics and Politics 22 (1): Article 4.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., and Tingley, Dustin. 2015. Sailing the Water’s Edge: The Domestic Politics of American Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jacob M., and Olivella, Santiago. 2018. “Tree-Based Models for Political Science Data.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 729–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric, and Plümper, Thomas. 2017. Robustness Tests for Quantitative Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okundaye, Gabriela, and Breuning, Marijke. 2021. “Is the Expansion of Women’s Access to Political Leadership Rewarded? Evidence from the Allocation of US Foreign Aid.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 42 (3): 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Tracy L. 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, and Knack, Stephen. 2012. “Individual and Country-Level Factors Affecting Support for Foreign Aid.” International Political Science Review 33 (2): 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011. “Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M., and Paskeviciute, Aida. 2003. “Women’s Access to Politics and Peaceful States.” Journal of Peace Research 40 (3): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Melinda N., and You, Hye Young. 2019. “Legislators as Lobbyists.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, Patrick, and Christian, Charlotte. 2017. “The Impact of Women Legislators on Humanitarian Military Interventions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (10): 2043–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2012. “Why Family Is a Foreign Policy Issue, Too.” Foreign Policy, no. 197: 73.Google Scholar
Smith, Karen E. 2020. “Missing in Analysis: Women in Foreign Policy-Making.” Foreign Policy Analysis 16 (1): 130–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffer, Katelyn E., Kobayashi, Yoshiharu, Martin-Morales, Kelsey M., Lankes, Riley, Heinrich, Tobias, and Goodwin, Catherine R.. n.d. “Does It Pay or Hurt Electorally to Promote International Development? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Working paper. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LPxa2vb0xyOuSPGnSaGxUE1SW4HX9jcN/view?usp=sharing.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2016. “Pursuing Women’s Interests in Partisan Times: Explaining Gender Differences in Legislative Activity on Health, Education, and Women’s Health Issues.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 37 (3): 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L., and Larson, Carin. 2005. “Women in Congress: Do They Act as Advocates for Women’s Issues?” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, 2nd ed., eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 110–28Google Scholar
Togeby, Lise. 1994. “The Gender Gap in Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Peace Research 31 (4): 375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Belle, Douglas A. 2004. Media, Bureaucracies, and Foreign Aid: A Comparative Analysis of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France and Japan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinkenburg, Claartje, Van Engen, Marloes, Eagly, Alice, and Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary. 2011. “An Exploration of Stereotypical Beliefs about Leadership Styles: Is Transformational Leadership a Route to Women’s Promotion?” Leadership Quarterly 22 (1): 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E. 2016. “Women’s Issues and Their Fates in the United States Congress.” Political Science Research and Methods 6 (4): 679–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1985. “Are Women More Liberal than Men in the US Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (1): 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Kristen P. 2017. “Feminism in Foreign Policy.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, ed. Thies, Cameron G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. “Explaining Women’s Rights Realignment: Convention Delegates, 1972–1992.” Political Behavior 24 (3): 237–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Mi Yung, and Moon, Chungshik. 2019. “Gender Equality in Politics at Home and Promotion of Gender Equality in Politics Abroad: The Role of Bilateral Official Development Assistance.” International Political Science Review 40 (2): 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Qingyuan, and Percival, Daniel. 2017. “Entropy Balancing Is Doubly Robust.” Journal of Causal Inference 5 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziaja, Sebastian. 2020. “More Donors, More Democracy.” Journal of Politics 82 (2): 433–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Stauffer et al. supplementary material

Stauffer et al. supplementary material

Download Stauffer et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 265.1 KB