Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-s84wp Total loading time: 0.245 Render date: 2022-07-05T06:22:45.302Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Petroleum Patriarchy? A Response to Ross

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2009

Pippa Norris
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Extract

The notion of a “resource curse” has been most commonly applied in explaining why many countries apparently blessed with abundant reserves of nonrenewable mineral resources, such as Nigerian oil, Democratic Republic of Congo gold, or Sierra Leone diamonds, in fact, are commonly blighted with less transparency and probity, economic stability, economic diversification, social equality, and investment in human capital. In these conditions, the heightened danger of state capture and rent seeking by ruling elites generate poorer prospects for the transition from autocracy and the consolidation of stable democracies (Auty 1993; Boix 2003; Dunning 2008; Jensen and Wantchekon 2004; Ross 2001). Lootable mineral resources, in particular, are thought to make a country particularly vulnerable to civil war, insurgency, and rebellion (Collier and Sambanis 2005; Humphreys 2005; Ross 2004, 2006; Snyder 2006).

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auty, Richard M. 1993. Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Sambanis, Nicholas, eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, ed. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2008. Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2009. Freedom in the World. http://www.freedomhouse.org (accessed June 1, 2009)Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan. 2005. “Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution—Uncovering the Mechanisms.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (4): 508–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International IDEA. 2008. The Arab Quota Report: Selected Case Studies. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torbin, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2008. “Work and Power: The Connection Between Female Labor Force Participation and Female Political Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, N., and Wantchekon, L.. 2004. “Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 37: 816–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2007. “Opening the Door: Women Leaders and Constitution-Building in Iraq and Afghanistan.” In Women Who Lead, ed. Kellerman, Barbara. New York: Jossey Bass, 197226.Google Scholar
Rizzo, H., Abdel-Latif, A. H., and Meyer, K.. 2007. “The Relationship between Gender Equality and Democracy: A Comparison of Arab versus Non-Arab Muslim Societies”. Sociology—Journal of the British Sociological Association 41 (6): 1151–70.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael L. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53: 325–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael L. 2004. “How Do Natural Resources Influence Civil War? Evidence from Thirteen Cases.” International Organization 58 (1): 3567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael L. 2006. “A Closer Look at Oil, Diamonds, and Civil War.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 265300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael L. 2008. “Oil, Islam, and Women.” American Political Science Review 102 (February):107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2006. “Does Lootable Wealth Breed Disorder? A Political Economy of Extraction Framework.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (8): 943–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Petroleum Patriarchy? A Response to Ross
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Petroleum Patriarchy? A Response to Ross
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Petroleum Patriarchy? A Response to Ross
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *