Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-mqrwx Total loading time: 0.217 Render date: 2022-12-06T21:03:26.434Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Jennifer L. Lawless
Affiliation:
Brown University

Extract

When Hillary Clinton announced her presidential candidacy, questions about the role of gender in presidential politics immediately surfaced. Would gender stereotyping and sexism pervade the electoral environment? Would the media treat Clinton differently than her competitors in the Democratic primary field? Would Clinton's candidacy mobilize women of all types, simply by virtue of its historic nature? And when Clinton lost the Democratic nomination, new questions quickly arose. Was America just not ready to elect a female president? To what extent did Bill Clinton account for Senator Clinton's successes and failures? How would the 18 million women and men who cast their ballots for Clinton vote in the general election? With so many interesting unknowns, political scientists will likely spend the next several years examining Hillary Clinton's campaign and assessing the extent to which her sex affected her experiences and contributed to her primary loss.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braden, Maria. 1996. Women Politicians in the Media. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne G., Banwart, Mary Christine, Kaid, Lynda Lee, and Robertson, Terry A.. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan and Schreiber, Ronnee. 1997. “Media Coverage of Women in the 103rd Congress.” In Women, Media and Politics, ed. Norris, P.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chaney, C., and Sinclair, B.. 1994. “Women and the 1992 House Elections.” In The Year of the Woman, ed. Cook, E. A., Thomas, S., and Wilcox, C.. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Falk, Erika. 2008. Women for President: Media Bias in Eight Campaigns. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L. 2006. “Congressional Elections: Where Are We on the Road to Gender Parity?” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, ed. Carroll, S. and Fox, R.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations?Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004a. “Politics of Presence: Women in the House and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 8199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004b. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2008. “Why Are Women Still Not Running for Public Office?” Issues in Governance Studies 16. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Under-Representation: Re-Evaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary US Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Squire, Peverill, and Jewell, Malcolm E.. 2001. Who Runs for the Legislature? Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Niven, David. 2006. “Throwing Your Hat Out of the Ring: Negative Recruitment and the Gender Imbalance in State Legislative Candidacy.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 473–89.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997a. “Introduction: Women, Media and Politics.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris, P.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997b. “Women Leaders Worldwide: A Splash of Color in the Photo Op.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris, P.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2006. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 3057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1995. “The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (3): 599612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, Richard A., Newman, Jody, and Leighton, Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric R.A.N., and Fox, Richard L.. 2001. “A Research Note: The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1998. “Introduction: Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future.” In Women and Elective Office, ed. Thomas, S. and Wilcox, C.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Seth, and Steckenrider, Janie. 1997. “Gender Stereotypes and Decision Context in the Evaluation of Political Candidates.” Women and Politics 17 (4): 7192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolleson Rinehart, Sue. 1992. Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weir, Sara J. 1996. “Women as Governors: State Executive Leadership With a Feminist Face?” In Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders, 2d ed., ed. Duke, L.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
55
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *