Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-6tv95 Total loading time: 0.26 Render date: 2021-05-16T02:33:56.505Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Women's Transnational Activism, Norm Cascades, and Quota Adoption in The Developing World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Liam Swiss
Affiliation:
Memorial University
Kathleen M. Fallon
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University
Corresponding

Abstract

Electoral quotas are a key factor in increasing women's political representation in parliaments globally. Despite the strong effects of quotas, less attention has been paid to the factors that prompt countries to adopt electoral quotas across developing countries. This article employs event history modeling to analyze quota adoption in 134 developing countries from 1987 to 2012, focusing on quota type, transnational activism, and norm cascades. The article asks the following questions: (1) How might quota adoption differ according to quota type—nonparty versus party quotas? (2) How has the 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China (Beijing 95), contributed to quota diffusion? (3) Do global, regional, or neighboring country effects contribute more to quota adoption? Results provide new evidence of how quota adoption processes differ according to quota type, the central role played by participation in Beijing 95, and how increased global counts contribute to faster nonparty quota adoption while increased neighboring country counts lead to faster to party quota adoption.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Adams, Kimberly S., and Becker, Jenna. 2007. “Strengthening the Spine of Democracy: How Women Are Changing the Face of Sub-Saharan African Politics.” International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities, and Nations 7 (2): 121–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Paul D. 1984. Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Miriam J., and Swiss, Liam. 2014. “Peace Accords and the Adoption of Electoral Quotas for Women in the Developing World, 1989–2005.” Politics & Gender 10 (1): 3361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballington, Julie, ed. 2004. The Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Bauer, Gretchen. 2004. “‘The Hand That Stirs the Pot Can Also Run the Country’: Electing Women to Parliament in Namibia.” Journal of Modern African Studies 42 (4): 479509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Gretchen. 2012. “‘Let There Be a Balance’: Women in African Parliaments.” Political Studies Review 10 (3): 370–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckfield, Jason. 2003. “Inequality in the World Polity: The Structure of International Organization.” American Sociological Review 68 (3): 401–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckfield, Jason. 2008. “The Dual World Polity: Fragmentation and Integration in the Network of Intergovernmental Organizations.” Social Problems 55 (3): 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, and Rohwer, Gotz. 2002. Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine. 2011. “Beyond the Big Picture: Gender Influences on Disaggregated and Domain-Specific Measures of Social Spending, 1980–1999.” Politics & Gender 7 (1): 3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine, and Brooks, Clem. 2007. “Women's Political Representation and Welfare State Spending in 12 Capitalist Democracies.” Social Forces 85 (4): 1509–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David. 2009. Rich Democracies, Poor People: How Politics Explain Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Richard D. 1989. Knowledge Is Power: The Diffusion of Information in Early America, 1700–1865. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Sarah. S. 2011. “International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures.” International Organization 65 (1): 103–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament the Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Li-Ju. 2010. “Do Gender Quotas Influence Women's Representation and Policies?European Journal of Comparative Economics 7 (1): 1360.Google Scholar
Cleves, Mario A., Gould, William W., and Gutierrez, Roberto G.. 2002. An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Wade M. 2013. “Government Respect for Gendered Rights: The Effect of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on Women's Rights Outcomes, 1981–2004.” International Studies Quarterly 57 (2): 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Adriana. 2007. “Gender Quota Laws in Latin America: Innovation, Diffusion, and the End of a Wave.” Cena Internacional 9 (2): 95124.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenval, Lenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 2648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, Kathleen M., Swiss, Liam, and Viterna, Jocelyn. 2012. “Resolving the Democracy Paradox: How Democratization Affects Women's Legislative Representation in Developing Nations.” American Sociological Review 77 (3): 380408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2001. “Women in Politics in Post-Transitional Democracies: The Chilean Case.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 3 (2): 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2012. “Conceptualizing the Impact of Gender Quotas.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, eds. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, Yvonne. 2006. “Bringing Women In: Global Strategies for Gender Parity in Political Representation.” University of Maryland Law International Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class 6: 319–36.Google Scholar
Gray, Tricia. 2003. “Electoral Gender Quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 22 (1): 5278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassim, Shireen. 2006. Women's Organizations and Democracy in South Africa: Contesting Authority. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2004. “Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala N., and Jones, Mark P.. 2002. “Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women's Leadership in Latin America.” In Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, eds. Molyneux, Maxine and Craske, Nikki. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 3256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M. 2009. “Armed Conflict, International Linkages, and Women's Parliamentary Representation.” Social Problems 56 (1): 174204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., Krook, Mona Lena, and Paxton, Pamela. 2015. “Transnational Women's Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (2): 357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., and Tripp, Aili Mari. 2015. “Civil War and Trajectories of Change in Women's Political Representation in Africa, 1985–2010.” Social Forces 93 (4): 1513–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). 2005. “Electoral System Design Database.” http://www.idea.int/esd/index.cfm (accessed June 23, 2016).Google Scholar
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). 2012. “Quota Project: Global Database of Quotas for Women.” http://www.quotaproject.org/ (accessed June 23, 2016).Google Scholar
Kabeer, Naila. 2005. “Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment: A Critical Analysis of the Third Millennium Development Goal.” Gender & Development 13 (1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide.” Politics & Gender 2 (3): 303–27.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide: New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2014. “Electoral Gender Quotas: A Conceptual Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (9): 1268–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and O'Brien, Diana Z.. 2010. “The Politics of Group Representation: Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide.” Comparative Politics 42 (3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., and Gurr, T. R.. 2009. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2007.” University of Maryland, Centre for Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (accessed June 23, 2016)Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 1998. “Women's Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (1): 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 2005. “Enhancing Women's Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems.” In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, eds. Ballington, Julie and Karam, Azza. Stockholm: International IDEA, 93110.Google Scholar
Meier, Petra. 2004. “The Mutual Contagion Effect of Legal and Party Quotas: A Belgian Perspective.” Party Politics 10 (5): 583600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M., and Green, Jennifer L.. 2006. “The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review 71 (6): 898920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M., and Painter, Matthew A.. 2010. “Growth in Women's Political Representation: A Longitudinal Exploration of Democracy, Electoral System and Gender Quotas.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (1): 2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatti-Crocker, Adriana, ed. 2011. Diffusion of Gender Quotas in Latin America and Beyond: Advances and Setbacks in the Last Two Decades. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Sacchet, Teresa. 2008. “Beyond Numbers: The Impact of Gender Quotas in Latin America.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 10 (3): 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Eran. N.d. “Why Do They Legislate? A Cross-National Time-Series Analysis of Terrorism and Counterterrorist Legislation.” Social Problems. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Stinnett, Douglas M., Tir, Jaroslav, Diehl, Paul F., Schafer, Philip, and Gochman, Charles. 2002. “The Correlates of War (COW) Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.0.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 19 (2): 5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockemer, Daniel. 2014. “Women's Descriptive Representation in Developed and Developing Countries.” International Political Science Review 36 (4): 393408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David, and Meyer, John W.. 1993. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” Theory and Society 22 (4): 487–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiss, Liam, Fallon, Kathleen M., and Burgos, Giovani. 2012. “Does Critical Mass Matter? Women's Political Representation and Child Health in Developing Countries.” Social Forces 91 (2): 531–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thames, Frank C., and Williams, Margaret S.. 2013. Contagious Representation: Women's Political Representation in Democracies around the World. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2012. “Norms and Social Hierarchies: Understanding International Policy Diffusion ‘From Below.’International Organization 66 (2): 179209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari, and Kang, Alice. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 338–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 1996. Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women, 1995. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Viterna, Jocelyn, and Fallon, Kathleen M.. 2008. “Democratization, Women's Movements, and Gender-Equitable States: A Framework for Comparison.” American Sociological Review 73 (4): 668–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wejnert, Barbara. 2002. “Integrating Diffusion Models: A Conceptual Framework.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 276306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wejnert, Barbara. 2005. “Diffusion, Development and Democracy, 1800–1999.” American Sociological Review 70 (1): 5381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2014. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google ScholarPubMed

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Women's Transnational Activism, Norm Cascades, and Quota Adoption in The Developing World
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Women's Transnational Activism, Norm Cascades, and Quota Adoption in The Developing World
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Women's Transnational Activism, Norm Cascades, and Quota Adoption in The Developing World
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *