Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered “Logic of Appropriateness”

  • Louise Chappell (a1)
Abstract

Why develop a comparative politics of gender? As the critical perspectives in this section demonstrate, there are many answers to this question. I would like to focus here on two reasons: first, for gaining a deeper understanding of the operations of political institutions, and second, for explaining the relationship between these institutions and social actors, including those pursuing a gender equality agenda. To be specific, this essay argues not just for a comparative politics of gender but for a comparative politics of gender and institutions. The discussion focuses on the possibility of using neo-institutionalist theory, especially in relation to its normative and dynamic understanding of institutions, to gain a deeper understanding of the way that gender shapes political institutions and also, through interaction with social actors, including feminists, the way gender norms can be disrupted to open new spaces for these actors.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Acker, Joan. 1992. “From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology21 (5): 56569.

Beckwith, Karen. 2000. “Beyond Compare? Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Political Research37 (4): 3168.

Beckwith, Karen. 2005. “A Common Language of Gender?Politics & Gender 1 (March): 12837.

Childs, Sarah. 2001. “In Her Own Words: New Labour Women and the Substantive Representation of Women.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations3 (2): 17190.

Friedman, Elisabeth Jay. 2003. “Gendering the Agenda: The Impact of the Transnational Women's Rights Movement at the UN Conferences of the 1990s.” Women's Studies International Forum26 (4): 31331.

Gallagher, Anne. 1997. “Ending the Marginalisation: Strategies for Incorporating Women into the UN Human Rights System.” Human Rights Quarterly19 (2): 283332.

Lovenduski, Joni. 1998. “Gendering Research in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science1: 33356.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF

 PDF (211 KB)
211 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 206 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 893 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.