Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures

  • Kathleen A. Bratton (a1)
Abstract

Research on women and representation has argued that women who serve in “skewed” legislatures—that is, legislatures in which women make up less than 15% of the membership—avoid addressing women's interests and are marginalized by other legislators. I argue that women in such legislatures may actually be encouraged to develop legislative agendas that are distinct from those of their male colleagues, and that they may be as successful as their male counterparts. Analyzing data from three state legislatures in four years, I find that even in extremely skewed state legislatures, women are generally more active than men in sponsoring legislation that focuses on women's interests; indeed, in two of the three states, gender differences narrow as the legislature becomes more gender balanced. Second, I find that women are generally as successful as men in passing the legislation that they sponsor, and that in very homogeneous settings, they are sometimes more successful than men. Moreover, little evidence exists that they are less likely to be appointed to leadership positions. Finally, I find that increasing gender diversity within a legislature is accompanied by a greater overall focus on women's issues. I conclude that a “critical mass” is not necessary for substantive representation on the part of individual female state legislators, but that increased diversity may indeed bring about changes in policy outputs that reflect the interests of women.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 32748.

Bratton, Kathleen A. 2002. “The Effect of Legislative Diversity on Agenda Setting: Evidence from Six State Legislatures.” American Politics Research 30 (2): 11542.

Bratton, Kathleen A., and Kerry L. Haynie. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 65879.

Bratton, Kathleen A., and Leonard P. Ray. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 42837.

Broughton, Sharon, and Sonia Palmieri. 1999. “Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debate; The Case of Euthanasia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 2945.

Childs, Sarah. 2001. “‘Attitudinally Feminist’? The New Labour Women MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Politics 21 (3): 17885.

Considine, Mark, and Iva Ellen Deutchman. 1996. “Instituting Gender: State Legislators in Australia and the United States.” Women and Politics 16 (4): 119.

Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (2): 27598.

Ellickson, Mark C. 1992. “Pathways to Legislative Success: A Path Analytic Study of the Missouri House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (2): 285302.

Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand's Women MPs.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 1929.

Herring, Mary. 1990. “Legislative Responsiveness to Black Constituents in Three Deep South States.” Journal of Politics 52 (3): 74058.

Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 50325.

Kanter, Rosabeth. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 96590.

Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 56076.

Kelly, Rita Mae, Michelle Saint-Germain, and Jody D. Horn. 1991. “Female Public Officials: A Different Voice?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 515 (1): 7787.

King, Gary. 1988. “Statistical Models for Political Science Event Counts: Bias in Conventional Procedures and Evidence for the Exponential Poisson Regression Model.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (3): 83863.

Moore, Michael K., and Sue Thomas. 1991. “Explaining Legislative Success in the U.S. Senate: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties.” Western Political Quarterly 44 (4): 95970.

Norris, Pippa. 1996. “Women Politicians: Transforming Westminster?Parliamentary Affairs 49 (1): 89102.

Reingold, Beth. 1992. “Concepts of Representation Among Female and Male State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (4): 50937.

Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 791809.

Studlar, Donley, and Ian McAllister. 2002. “Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women's Legislative Representation Since 1950.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 23353.

Thomas, Sue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” Journal of Politics 53 (4): 95876.

Vega, Arturo, and Juanita M. Firestone. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 21322.

Weissert, Carol S. 1991. “Issue Salience and State Legislative Effectiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (4): 50920.

Welch, Susan. 1985. “Are Women More Liberal Than Men in the U.S. Congress?Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (1): 12534.

Yoder, Janice D. 1991. “Rethinking Tokenism: Looking Beyond Numbers.” Gender and Society 5 (2): 17892.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 31
Total number of PDF views: 290 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1436 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.