Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Descriptive Representation and the Political Engagement of Women

  • Jennifer Wolak (a1)
Abstract

When women are represented on the campaign trail and in elected office, women in the electorate have been shown to report greater engagement in politics. However, most evidence of the effects of descriptive representation on women's empowerment is drawn from surveys from the 1980s and 1990s. I update these studies to consider how women candidates and officeholders affect the political knowledge, interest, and participation of other women in the electorate. Using responses from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study from 2006 to 2014, I find that both men and women are more politically knowledgeable when represented by women in Congress and in state government. Considering political engagement, I find little evidence that women are more politically interested or participatory when residing in places with more female officeholders or candidates. Women's political presence as candidates and officeholders does not uniquely encourage other women to engage in political life.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65:1040–61.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Carrillo, Nancy. 2007. “More Is Better: The Influence of Collective Female Descriptive Representation on External Efficacy.” Politics & Gender 3:79101.
Bennett, Linda L.M., and Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1989. “Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions.” American Politics Research 17:105122.
Broockman, David E. 2014. “Do Female Politicians Empower Women to Vote or Run for Office? A Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Electoral Studies 34:190204.
Brooks, Deborah J. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Burns, Nancy, and Kinder, Donald. 2012. “Categorical Politics: Gender, Race, and Public Opinion.” In New Directions in Public Opinion, ed. Berinsky, Adam J.. New York: Routledge.
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–47.
Carroll, Susan. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Coleman, John J., and Manna, Paul F.. 2000. “Congressional Campaign Spending and the Quality of Democracy.” Journal of Politics 62:757–89.
Conway, M. Margaret. 2008. “The Gender Gap: A Comparison across Racial and Ethnic Groups.” In Voting the Gender Gap, ed. Whitaker, Lois Duke, 170–84. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dolan, Kathleen. 2006. “Symbolic Mobilization? The Impact of Candidate Sex in American Elections.” American Politics Research 34:687704.
Dolan, Kathleen. 2011. “Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 73:97107.
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter?: Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dolan, Kathleen, and Lynch, Timothy. 2015. “Making the Connection? Attitudes about Women in Politics and Voting for Women Candidates.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3:111–32.
Dolan, Kathleen, and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2009. “Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender Balance in Government.” American Politics Research 37:409–28.
Fox, Richard. 2000. “Gender and Congressional Elections.” In Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process, ed. Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue and Josephson, Jyl. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2014. “Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” American Political Science Review 108:499519.
Franz, Michael M., Freedman, Paul B., Goldstein, Kenneth M. and Ridout, Travis N.. 2008. Campaign Advertising and American Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2014. “How the Gender of U.S. Senators Influences People's Understanding and Engagement in Politics.” Journal of Politics 76:1017–31.
Gimpel, James G., Kaufmann, Karen M., and Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna. 2007. “Battleground States versus Blackout States: The Behavioral Implications of Modern Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 69:786–97.
Hansen, Susan B. 1997. “Talking about Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 73103.
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2016. Multidimensional Democracy: A Supply and Demand Theory of Representation in American Legislatures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 133–65.
Hayes, Danny, and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2016. Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
High-Pippert, Angela, and Comer, John. 1998. “Female Empowerment: The Influence of Women Representing Women.” Women and Politics 19:5366.
Huang, Francis L. 2016. “Alternatives to Multilevel Modeling for the Analysis of Clustered Data.” Journal of Experimental Education 84:175–96.
Huddy, Leonie, and Capelos, Theresa. 2002. “The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Voters’ Assessment of Women Candidates.” In Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues: Developments in Political Psychology, ed. Ottati, Victor. New York: Kluwer Academic.
Jennings, M. Kent. 1983. “Gender Roles and Inequalities in Political Participation: Results from an Eight-Nation Study.” Western Political Quarterly 36 (3): 364–85.
Jerit, Jennifer, and Barabas, Jason. 2017. “Revisiting the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Political Behavior 39:817–38.
Jones, Philip Edward. 2014. “Does the Descriptive Representation of Gender Influence Accountability for Substantive Representation?Politics & Gender 10 (2): 175–99.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1994. “The Distorted Mirror: Press Coverage of Women Candidates for Statewide Office.” Journal of Politics 56:154–73.
Koch, Jeffrey. 1997. “Candidate Gender and Women's Psychological Engagement in Politics.” American Politics Quarterly 25 (1): 118–33.
Kinder, Donald R., and Allison, Dale-Riddle. 2012. The End of Race? Obama, 2008, and Racial Politics in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 57:8199.
Lupia, Arthur. 2015. Uninformed: Why People Seem to Know so Little about Politics and What We Can Do About It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2006. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Clarendon Press.
Prior, Markus. 2010. “You've Either Got It or You Don't? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle.” Journal of Politics 72:747–66.
Reingold, Beth, and Harrell, Jessica. 2010. “The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women's Political Engagement: Does Party Matter?Political Research Quarterly 63:280–94.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.
Sapiro, Virginia, and Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1997. “The Variable Gender Basis of Electoral Politics: Gender and Context in the 1992 Election.” British Journal of Political Science 27:497523.
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46:218–37.
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–72.
Welch, Susan. 1977. “Women as Political Animals? A Test of Some Explanations for Male-Female Political Participation Differences.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (4): 711–30.
Wolbrecht, Christina, and Campbell, David E.. 2017. “Role Models Revisited: Youth, Novelty, and the Impact of Female Candidates.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5:418–34.
Wolak, Jennifer. 2006. “The Consequences of Presidential Battleground Strategies for Citizen Engagement.” Political Research Quarterly 59:353–61.
Wolak, Jennifer. 2015. “Candidate Gender and the Political Engagement of Women and Men.” American Politics Research 43:872–96.
Wolak, Jennifer, and McDevitt, Michael. 2011. “The Roots of the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge in Adolescence.” Political Behavior 33 (3): 505–33.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Wolak supplementary material
Wolak supplementary material 1

 Word (231 KB)
231 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed