Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Gender and Legislative Preferences: Evidence from the Argentine Provinces

  • Tiffany D. Barnes (a1)
Extract

Women are underrepresented in most of the world's legislatures. While the scarcity of female representation is problematic for multiple reasons, one of the central concerns of advocates and scholars rests on the assumption that women have different legislative preferences than their male counterparts. If this is the case, then it implies that where women do not occupy an equitable proportion of the legislature, their interests are not well represented.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alemán, Eduardo, Calvo, Ernesto, Jones, Mark P., and Kapland, Noah. 2009. “Comparing Cosponsorship and Roll Call Ideal Points.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 87116.
Balla, Steven J., and Christine Nemacheck, L.. 2000. “Position-Taking, Legislative Signaling, and Non-Expert Extremism: Cosponsorship of Managed Care Legislation in the 105th House of Representatives.” Congress and the Presidency 27 (2): 163–88.
Barnello, Michele A. 1999. “Gender and Roll Call Voting in the New York State Assembly.” Women and Politics 20 (4): 7794.
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Jones, Mark. P.. 2011. “Women in Executives: Latin America” In Women in Executives: A Global Overview, eds. Bauer, Gretchen and Tremblay, Manon. New York: Routledge.
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 658–79.
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House: Campaigns for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Campbell, James. 1982. “Cosponsoring Legislation in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7 (3): 415–22.
Carey, John. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Chhibber, Pradeep, and Kollman, Ken. 1998. “Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 329–42.
Clark, Janet. 1998. “Women at the National Level: An Update on Roll-call Voting Behavior.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.
Clinton, Joshua D., Jackman, Simon D., and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data: A Unified Approach.” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 355–70.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crisp, Brian, Kanthak, Kristin, and Leijonhufvud, Jenny. 2004. “The Reputations Legislators Build: With Whom Should Representatives Collaborate?American Political Science Review 98 (4): 703–16.
De Luca, Miguel, Jones, Mark P., and Inés Tula, María. 2002. “Back Rooms or Ballot Boxes? Candidate Nomination in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (4): 413–36.
De Riz, Liliana. 1996. “Argentina: Democracy in Turmoil.” In Constructing Democratic Governance: South America in the 1990s, eds. Jorge Domínguez, I. and Lowenthal, Abraham F.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Desposato, Scott. 2004. “The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 259–85.
Fowler, James H. 2006. “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks.” Political Analysis 14 (4): 456–87.
Franceschet, Susan. 2011. “Gender Policy and State Architecture in Latin America.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 273–79.
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393425.
Frankovich, Kathleen A. 1977. “Sex and Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1961–1975.” American Politics Quarterly 5 (3): 315–31.
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, Edward L., and Calvo, Ernesto. 2000. “Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: The Territorial Dimension of Economic Reform in Argentina.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (5): 3255.
Highton, Benjamin, and Rocca, Michael. 2005. “Beyond the Roll-call Arena: The Determinants of Position Taking in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (2): 303–16.
Hogan, Robert E. 2008. “Sex and the Statehouse: The Effects of Gender on Legislative Roll-Call Voting.” Social Science Quarterly 89 (4): 956–67.
Jones, Mark P. 2008. “The Recruitment and Selection of Legislative Candidates in Argentina.” In Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, eds. Peter Siavelis, M. and Morgenstern, Scott. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Jones, Mark P., and Hwang, Wonjae. 2005a. “Party Government in Presidential Democracies: Extending Cartel Theory Beyond the U.S. Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 267–83.
Jones, Mark P., and Hwang, Wonjae. 2005b. “Provincial Party Bosses: Keystone of the Argentine Congress.” In The Politics of Institutional Weaknesses: Argentine Democracy, eds. Levitsky, Steven and Victoria Murillo, María. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Kessler, Daniel, and Krehbiel, Keih. 1996. “Dynamics of Cosponsorship.” The American Political Science Review 90 (3): 555–66.
Koger, Gregory. 2003. “Position-Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (2): 225–46.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 906–23.
Leader, Shelah G. 1977. “The Policy Impact of Elected Women Officials.” In The Impact of the Electoral Process, eds. Maisel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Londregan, John. 2000. “Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points.” Political Analysis 8 (1): 3556.
McCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole, T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 673–88.
Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Manzetti, Luigi. 1993. Institutions, Parties, and Coalitions in Argentine Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Martin, Andrew, and Quinn, Kevin. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10 (2): 134–53.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Norton, Noelle H. 1997. “Analyzing Roll Call Voting Tools for Content: Are Women's Issues Excluded from Legislative Research?Women and Politics 17 (4): 4769.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2011. “Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates.” Parliamentary Affairs 11 (3): 125.
Pitkin, Hannah. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkley: University of California Press.
Poggione, Sarah. 2004. “Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators' Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 305–14.
Poole, Keith. 2000. “Non-parametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data.” Political Analysis 8 (3): 211–37.
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 228–78.
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (1): 529.
Reingold, Beth. 1992. “Concepts of Representation among Female and Male State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (4): 509–37.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. Political Power and Women's Representation in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Corbetta, Renato. 2004. “Gender Turnover and Roll Call Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 215–29.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (1): 2760.
Sulkin, Tracy, and Swigger, Nathaniel. 2008. “Is There Truth in Advertising? Campaign Ad Images as Signals about Legislative Behavior.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 232–44.
Swers, Michele. L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills Than Their Male Colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48.
Swers, Michele. L.. 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Talbert, Jeffery C., and Potoski, Matthew. 2002. “Setting the Legislative Agenda: The Dimensional Structure of Bill Cosponsoring and Floor Voting.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 864–91.
Tatalovitch, Raymond, and Schier, David. 1993. “The Persistence of Ideological Cleavage in Voting on Abortion Legislation in the House of Representatives, 1973–1988.” American Politics Research 21 (1): 125–39.
Thomas, Sue. 1989. “Voting Patterns in the California Assembly: The Role of Gender.” Women and Politics 9 (4): 4353.
Thomas, Sue. 1997. “Why Gender Matters: The Perceptions of Women Officeholders.” Women and Politics 17 (1): 2753.
Vega, Arturo, and Firestone, Juanita M.. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 213–22.
Welch, Susan. 1985. “Are Women More Liberal Than Men in the U.S. Congress?Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (1): 125–34.
Wilson, Rick K., and Young, Cheryl D.. 1997. “Cosponsorship in the United States Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (1): 2443.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 51 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 428 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.